Sara El-Sayed Abd El-Ghani, Lina Ayman Mahmoud Mohamed, Mohamed Roshdi El-Masry, Hala M Abdelhamid, Mohamed Fateen, Marwa Salah Mohamed
{"title":"CD8+CD25+ Tregs as a predictor of glucocorticoid sensitivity in patients with immune thrombocytopenia.","authors":"Sara El-Sayed Abd El-Ghani, Lina Ayman Mahmoud Mohamed, Mohamed Roshdi El-Masry, Hala M Abdelhamid, Mohamed Fateen, Marwa Salah Mohamed","doi":"10.1080/17474086.2025.2467386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>ITP is an immune-mediated disorder showing increased platelet destruction and reduced platelet production. Glucocorticoids are the first-line treatment, but 10-20% of patients are insensitive to them. We should avoid the irrational use of steroids for treating ITP. No markers exist to predict treatment responses in ITP. Recently, a few studies showed abnormal ratio and function of Tregs in ITP patients and that the levels of Tregs change after glucocorticoid treatment. We aimed to study the value of CD8+ CD25+ Tregs in predicting glucocorticoid sensitivity in newly diagnosed ITP patients.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This cohort (longitudinal) study included 60 ITP patients. The baseline platelet counts and levels of CD8+ CD25+ Tregs were measured at diagnosis. The response to steroids was evaluated after 2 weeks of treatment, then after 3 months and 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ROC curve was plotted, and the <i>p</i> value was not significant; therefore, the optimal critical value, specificity and sensitivity could not be determined.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study couldn't confirm the value of CD8+CD25+ Tregs in predicting glucocorticoid sensitivity in ITP, but there was a significant positive correlation between the CD8+CD25+ Tregs percentage and the steroids' response after 2 weeks. Therefore, further studies are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":12325,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Hematology","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17474086.2025.2467386","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: ITP is an immune-mediated disorder showing increased platelet destruction and reduced platelet production. Glucocorticoids are the first-line treatment, but 10-20% of patients are insensitive to them. We should avoid the irrational use of steroids for treating ITP. No markers exist to predict treatment responses in ITP. Recently, a few studies showed abnormal ratio and function of Tregs in ITP patients and that the levels of Tregs change after glucocorticoid treatment. We aimed to study the value of CD8+ CD25+ Tregs in predicting glucocorticoid sensitivity in newly diagnosed ITP patients.
Research design and methods: This cohort (longitudinal) study included 60 ITP patients. The baseline platelet counts and levels of CD8+ CD25+ Tregs were measured at diagnosis. The response to steroids was evaluated after 2 weeks of treatment, then after 3 months and 6 months.
Results: The ROC curve was plotted, and the p value was not significant; therefore, the optimal critical value, specificity and sensitivity could not be determined.
Conclusions: This study couldn't confirm the value of CD8+CD25+ Tregs in predicting glucocorticoid sensitivity in ITP, but there was a significant positive correlation between the CD8+CD25+ Tregs percentage and the steroids' response after 2 weeks. Therefore, further studies are recommended.
期刊介绍:
Advanced molecular research techniques have transformed hematology in recent years. With improved understanding of hematologic diseases, we now have the opportunity to research and evaluate new biological therapies, new drugs and drug combinations, new treatment schedules and novel approaches including stem cell transplantation. We can also expect proteomics, molecular genetics and biomarker research to facilitate new diagnostic approaches and the identification of appropriate therapies. Further advances in our knowledge regarding the formation and function of blood cells and blood-forming tissues should ensue, and it will be a major challenge for hematologists to adopt these new paradigms and develop integrated strategies to define the best possible patient care. Expert Review of Hematology (1747-4086) puts these advances in context and explores how they will translate directly into clinical practice.