Molecular assessment of splicing variants in a cohort of patients with inborn errors of immunity: methodological approach and interpretation remarks.

IF 7 2区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Frontiers in Immunology Pub Date : 2025-01-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2024.1499415
Laura Miguel Berenguel, Carla Gianelli, Elisabet Matas Pérez, Teresa Del Rosal, Ana Méndez Echevarría, Ángel Robles Marhuenda, Marta Feito Rodríguez, Maria Teresa Caballero Molina, Lorena Magallares García, Brenda Sánchez Garrido, Samantha Hita Díaz, Luis Allende Martínez, Pilar Nozal Aranda, Carmen Cámara Hijón, Eduardo López Granados, Rebeca Rodríguez Pena, María Bravo García-Morato
{"title":"Molecular assessment of splicing variants in a cohort of patients with inborn errors of immunity: methodological approach and interpretation remarks.","authors":"Laura Miguel Berenguel, Carla Gianelli, Elisabet Matas Pérez, Teresa Del Rosal, Ana Méndez Echevarría, Ángel Robles Marhuenda, Marta Feito Rodríguez, Maria Teresa Caballero Molina, Lorena Magallares García, Brenda Sánchez Garrido, Samantha Hita Díaz, Luis Allende Martínez, Pilar Nozal Aranda, Carmen Cámara Hijón, Eduardo López Granados, Rebeca Rodríguez Pena, María Bravo García-Morato","doi":"10.3389/fimmu.2024.1499415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Splicing is the molecular mechanism to produce mature messenger RNA (mRNA) before its translation into protein. It is estimated that 50% of disease-causing mutations disrupt splicing, mostly of them affecting canonical positions. However, variants occurring in coding regions or deep-intronic variants can also affect splicing. In these cases, interpretation of the results may be challenging and molecular validation is required.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study includes 23 patients with splicing variants out of a cohort of 187 patients diagnosed with inborn errors of immunity (IEI). Clinical features and immunophenotypes are shown. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the molecular assay employed for pathogenicity validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We detected 23 patients of 20 pedigrees with splicing variants in IEI genes, which constitutes the 12.3% of our cohort. In total, 21 splicing variants were analyzed, 10 of which had previously been reported in the literature and 11 novel ones. Among the 23 patients, 16 showed variants at canonical splice sites. Molecular validation was required only in the cases of genes of uncertain significance (GUS), high homology pseudogenes or incompatible clinical phenotype. Seven patients showed variants outside canonical positions. All of them needed molecular validation, with the exception of two patients, whose variants had previously been well characterized in the medical literature.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows the proportion of splicing variants in a cohort of IEI patients, providing their clinical phenotypic characteristics and the methodology used to validate the splicing defects. Based on the results, an algorithm is proposed to clarify when a splicing variant should be validated by complementary methodology and when, by contrast, it can be directly considered disease causing.</p>","PeriodicalId":12622,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Immunology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1499415"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11814461/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1499415","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Splicing is the molecular mechanism to produce mature messenger RNA (mRNA) before its translation into protein. It is estimated that 50% of disease-causing mutations disrupt splicing, mostly of them affecting canonical positions. However, variants occurring in coding regions or deep-intronic variants can also affect splicing. In these cases, interpretation of the results may be challenging and molecular validation is required.

Methods: The study includes 23 patients with splicing variants out of a cohort of 187 patients diagnosed with inborn errors of immunity (IEI). Clinical features and immunophenotypes are shown. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the molecular assay employed for pathogenicity validation.

Results: We detected 23 patients of 20 pedigrees with splicing variants in IEI genes, which constitutes the 12.3% of our cohort. In total, 21 splicing variants were analyzed, 10 of which had previously been reported in the literature and 11 novel ones. Among the 23 patients, 16 showed variants at canonical splice sites. Molecular validation was required only in the cases of genes of uncertain significance (GUS), high homology pseudogenes or incompatible clinical phenotype. Seven patients showed variants outside canonical positions. All of them needed molecular validation, with the exception of two patients, whose variants had previously been well characterized in the medical literature.

Conclusion: This study shows the proportion of splicing variants in a cohort of IEI patients, providing their clinical phenotypic characteristics and the methodology used to validate the splicing defects. Based on the results, an algorithm is proposed to clarify when a splicing variant should be validated by complementary methodology and when, by contrast, it can be directly considered disease causing.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一组先天性免疫缺陷患者剪接变异的分子评估:方法学方法和解释注释。
背景:剪接是信使RNA (mRNA)在转化为蛋白质之前产生成熟的分子机制。据估计,50%的致病突变会破坏剪接,其中大多数会影响典型位点。然而,发生在编码区域的变异或深内含子变异也会影响剪接。在这些情况下,对结果的解释可能具有挑战性,需要进行分子验证。方法:从187例诊断为先天性免疫缺陷(IEI)的患者中选取23例剪接变异体患者作为研究对象。显示临床特征和免疫表型。逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)是用于致病性验证的分子检测方法。结果:我们在20个家系中检测到23例IEI基因剪接变异,占我们队列的12.3%。共分析了21个剪接变异体,其中10个为文献报道,11个为新发现。在23例患者中,16例在典型剪接位点显示变异。只有在不确定意义基因(GUS)、高同源性假基因或不相容临床表型的情况下,才需要进行分子验证。7例患者在规范位置外出现变异。所有这些人都需要分子验证,除了两个病人,他们的变异已经在医学文献中得到了很好的描述。结论:本研究显示了IEI患者队列中剪接变异的比例,提供了他们的临床表型特征和用于验证剪接缺陷的方法。在此基础上,提出了一种算法来澄清何时应该用互补方法验证剪接变体,以及何时可以直接认为它是致病的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
11.00%
发文量
7153
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Immunology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across basic, translational and clinical immunology. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. Frontiers in Immunology is the official Journal of the International Union of Immunological Societies (IUIS). Encompassing the entire field of Immunology, this journal welcomes papers that investigate basic mechanisms of immune system development and function, with a particular emphasis given to the description of the clinical and immunological phenotype of human immune disorders, and on the definition of their molecular basis.
期刊最新文献
Integrative multi-omics profiling reveals coordinated immunometabolic reprogramming and host-microbiome interactions in acute pancreatitis. Proteasome inhibition induces a BRCAness-like state and sensitises HR-proficient ovarian cancer models to PARP inhibitors. PANoptosis in diabetic retinopathy: immunological insights into mechanisms and translational therapies. Neonatal CD19+B220lo cells sense microbiota via TLR2/4 activation driving proliferation and differentiation. Neural regulation of tumor progression: implications for hepatocellular carcinoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1