{"title":"Differences in experiences of patients with advanced cancer in Japan from 3 to 6 years after diagnosis.","authors":"Yuichi Ichinose, Tsutomu Toida, Tomone Watanabe, Takafumi Wakita, Takahiro Higashi","doi":"10.1007/s11764-025-01761-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Coping with cancer presents significant challenges, especially for those with advanced-stage and long-term survival. However, research on advanced-stage cancer experiences in Japan remains limited. This study analyzed how patient experiences with advanced-stage cancer/long-term survival varied across different diagnosis periods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined two groups of patients with advanced cancer diagnosed in 2013 and 2016 using data from the Patient Experience Survey, a nationwide survey of cancer patients in Japan in 2019. Weighted analysis was used to estimate the distribution of patient experiences in the representative population. We compared the experiences of patients diagnosed with advanced-stage disease in 2016 (newer diagnosis group) and 2013 (earlier diagnosis group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 1584 participants in the newer diagnosis group and 412 in the earlier diagnosis group, with response rates of 30.8% and 43.0% respectively (P < 0.01). The earlier group had more proxy responses (38.0% vs. 43.2%). Survey response distribution was similar across groups; however, earlier diagnosis patients reported worse access to treatment information, lower satisfaction, and less positive post-treatment experiences than did newer patients. However, when considering respondent type, patient responses were consistent across years, whereas proxy responses were more negative.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Differences in survey timing and response types significantly impact the reported patient experiences. Policymakers should consider these factors when designing cancer control strategies to support patients and families.</p><p><strong>Implications for cancer survivors: </strong>Policymakers should use these findings to enhance cancer control strategies, addressing the distress of patients and families affected by advanced and long-term cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":15284,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Survivorship","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Survivorship","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-025-01761-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Coping with cancer presents significant challenges, especially for those with advanced-stage and long-term survival. However, research on advanced-stage cancer experiences in Japan remains limited. This study analyzed how patient experiences with advanced-stage cancer/long-term survival varied across different diagnosis periods.
Methods: We examined two groups of patients with advanced cancer diagnosed in 2013 and 2016 using data from the Patient Experience Survey, a nationwide survey of cancer patients in Japan in 2019. Weighted analysis was used to estimate the distribution of patient experiences in the representative population. We compared the experiences of patients diagnosed with advanced-stage disease in 2016 (newer diagnosis group) and 2013 (earlier diagnosis group).
Results: We analyzed 1584 participants in the newer diagnosis group and 412 in the earlier diagnosis group, with response rates of 30.8% and 43.0% respectively (P < 0.01). The earlier group had more proxy responses (38.0% vs. 43.2%). Survey response distribution was similar across groups; however, earlier diagnosis patients reported worse access to treatment information, lower satisfaction, and less positive post-treatment experiences than did newer patients. However, when considering respondent type, patient responses were consistent across years, whereas proxy responses were more negative.
Conclusions: Differences in survey timing and response types significantly impact the reported patient experiences. Policymakers should consider these factors when designing cancer control strategies to support patients and families.
Implications for cancer survivors: Policymakers should use these findings to enhance cancer control strategies, addressing the distress of patients and families affected by advanced and long-term cancer.
期刊介绍:
Cancer survivorship is a worldwide concern. The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to provide a global forum for new knowledge related to cancer survivorship. The journal publishes peer-reviewed papers relevant to improving the understanding, prevention, and management of the multiple areas related to cancer survivorship that can affect quality of care, access to care, longevity, and quality of life. It is a forum for research on humans (both laboratory and clinical), clinical studies, systematic and meta-analytic literature reviews, policy studies, and in rare situations case studies as long as they provide a new observation that should be followed up on to improve outcomes related to cancer survivors. Published articles represent a broad range of fields including oncology, primary care, physical medicine and rehabilitation, many other medical and nursing specialties, nursing, health services research, physical and occupational therapy, public health, behavioral medicine, psychology, social work, evidence-based policy, health economics, biobehavioral mechanisms, and qualitative analyses. The journal focuses exclusively on adult cancer survivors, young adult cancer survivors, and childhood cancer survivors who are young adults. Submissions must target those diagnosed with and treated for cancer.