Comparison of viscoelastic coagulation parameters, blood loss and surgical time between asymptomatic heartworm antigen-positive and negative dogs presented for elective gonadectomy.
B K Newmans, J M Fudge, R Clarkin-Breslin, D C Silverstein, G G Verocai
{"title":"Comparison of viscoelastic coagulation parameters, blood loss and surgical time between asymptomatic heartworm antigen-positive and negative dogs presented for elective gonadectomy.","authors":"B K Newmans, J M Fudge, R Clarkin-Breslin, D C Silverstein, G G Verocai","doi":"10.1111/jsap.13834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary objective of this study was to evaluate viscoelastic profiles in heartworm antigen-positive versus antigen-negative dogs using a point-of-care viscoelastic device. A secondary objective was to compare intraoperative bleeding and surgical duration between these same groups.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Dogs presented for elective surgical gonadectomy were screened for the presence of heartworm antigen using a commercial antigen detection test. Viscoelastic testing was performed in equal numbers of asymptomatic heartworm antigen-positive and -negative dogs. Viscoelastic data recorded included Clot Time, Clot Formation Time, α-angle, Maximum Clot Formation, Amplitude at 10 minutes (A10), Amplitude at 20 minutes (A20), Lysis Index at 30 minutes (LI30) and Lysis Index at 45 minutes (LI45). Other data included intraoperative blood loss via the gravimetric technique and surgical time (incision to closure).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 60 dogs (30 heartworm antigen-negative and 30 heartworm antigen-positive) were enrolled in the study. There were no significant differences between Clot Time, Clot Formation Time, α-angle, LI30 and LI45 between heartworm antigen-positive and -negative dogs; however, Maximum Clot Formation, A10 and A20 were higher in heartworm antigen-positive dogs. All viscoelastic results were within previously published normal reference ranges. No significant differences in surgical gonadectomy duration or intraoperative blood loss were observed between groups for male or female dogs.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Apparently healthy heartworm antigen-positive dogs were relatively hypercoagulable as defined by viscoelastic testing compared to heartworm antigen-negative dogs. There was no apparent additional risk of bleeding in dogs with subclinical heartworm infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":17062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Small Animal Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Small Animal Practice","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsap.13834","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate viscoelastic profiles in heartworm antigen-positive versus antigen-negative dogs using a point-of-care viscoelastic device. A secondary objective was to compare intraoperative bleeding and surgical duration between these same groups.
Materials and methods: Dogs presented for elective surgical gonadectomy were screened for the presence of heartworm antigen using a commercial antigen detection test. Viscoelastic testing was performed in equal numbers of asymptomatic heartworm antigen-positive and -negative dogs. Viscoelastic data recorded included Clot Time, Clot Formation Time, α-angle, Maximum Clot Formation, Amplitude at 10 minutes (A10), Amplitude at 20 minutes (A20), Lysis Index at 30 minutes (LI30) and Lysis Index at 45 minutes (LI45). Other data included intraoperative blood loss via the gravimetric technique and surgical time (incision to closure).
Results: A total of 60 dogs (30 heartworm antigen-negative and 30 heartworm antigen-positive) were enrolled in the study. There were no significant differences between Clot Time, Clot Formation Time, α-angle, LI30 and LI45 between heartworm antigen-positive and -negative dogs; however, Maximum Clot Formation, A10 and A20 were higher in heartworm antigen-positive dogs. All viscoelastic results were within previously published normal reference ranges. No significant differences in surgical gonadectomy duration or intraoperative blood loss were observed between groups for male or female dogs.
Clinical significance: Apparently healthy heartworm antigen-positive dogs were relatively hypercoagulable as defined by viscoelastic testing compared to heartworm antigen-negative dogs. There was no apparent additional risk of bleeding in dogs with subclinical heartworm infection.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Small Animal Practice (JSAP) is a monthly peer-reviewed publication integrating clinical research papers and case reports from international sources, covering all aspects of medicine and surgery relating to dogs, cats and other small animals. These papers facilitate the dissemination and implementation of new ideas and techniques relating to clinical veterinary practice, with the ultimate aim of promoting best practice. JSAP publishes high quality original articles, as well as other scientific and educational information. New developments are placed in perspective, encompassing new concepts and peer commentary. The target audience is veterinarians primarily engaged in the practise of small animal medicine and surgery.
In addition to original articles, JSAP will publish invited editorials (relating to a manuscript in the same issue or a topic of current interest), review articles, which provide in-depth discussion of important clinical issues, and other scientific and educational information from around the world.
The final decision on publication of a manuscript rests with the Editorial Board and ultimately with the Editor. All papers, regardless of type, represent the opinion of the authors and not necessarily that of the Editor, the Association or the Publisher.
The Journal of Small Animal Practice is published on behalf of the British Small Animal Veterinary Association and is also the official scientific journal of the World Small Animal Veterinary Association