What Differentiates Dropping Out from Remaining in a Brief Intervention for Problematic and Dependent Methamphetamine Users?

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of psychoactive drugs Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1080/02791072.2025.2464792
Magdalena Maria Rowicka
{"title":"What Differentiates Dropping Out from Remaining in a Brief Intervention for Problematic and Dependent Methamphetamine Users?","authors":"Magdalena Maria Rowicka","doi":"10.1080/02791072.2025.2464792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Amphetamine-type stimulants (including methamphetamine) are the second most frequently used illicit substances, after cannabis worldwide. The treatment dropout rate is higher among stimulant users than in the case of any other substance. Younger age, greater severity of the substance use disorder, lower motivation to change, and greater mental health problems are among the predictors of treatment dropout. Research showed that a brief intervention with cognitive-behavioral strategies and motivational interviewing addresses the most paramount issues. This paper investigates the differences between the individuals who dropped out and those who remained in the intervention. Twenty-one participants dropped out from the intervention, and 32 remained in the intervention. The analyzed variables included illicit substance use, severity of methamphetamine dependence, alcohol use (with distinction between spirits, wine and beer), motivation to change (readiness for change questionnaire), depressive and generalized anxiety symptoms, life satisfaction and self-efficacy. The results showed no differences between the two investigated groups except for beer consumed 30 days before the intervention. (the drop-out group consumed statistically more beer). The results showed that there is a need for further investigation since none of the substance use or person-specific characteristics differentiated dropping out from remaining in the intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":16902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychoactive drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychoactive drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2025.2464792","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Amphetamine-type stimulants (including methamphetamine) are the second most frequently used illicit substances, after cannabis worldwide. The treatment dropout rate is higher among stimulant users than in the case of any other substance. Younger age, greater severity of the substance use disorder, lower motivation to change, and greater mental health problems are among the predictors of treatment dropout. Research showed that a brief intervention with cognitive-behavioral strategies and motivational interviewing addresses the most paramount issues. This paper investigates the differences between the individuals who dropped out and those who remained in the intervention. Twenty-one participants dropped out from the intervention, and 32 remained in the intervention. The analyzed variables included illicit substance use, severity of methamphetamine dependence, alcohol use (with distinction between spirits, wine and beer), motivation to change (readiness for change questionnaire), depressive and generalized anxiety symptoms, life satisfaction and self-efficacy. The results showed no differences between the two investigated groups except for beer consumed 30 days before the intervention. (the drop-out group consumed statistically more beer). The results showed that there is a need for further investigation since none of the substance use or person-specific characteristics differentiated dropping out from remaining in the intervention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对有问题和依赖的甲基苯丙胺使用者来说,退出和留在短暂干预中有什么区别?
安非他明类兴奋剂(包括甲基苯丙胺)是全世界仅次于大麻的第二大最常使用的非法物质。兴奋剂使用者的治疗退出率高于其他任何药物使用者。年龄越小,物质使用障碍的严重程度越高,改变的动机越低,心理健康问题越严重,这些都是退出治疗的预测因素。研究表明,用认知行为策略和动机性访谈进行简短的干预可以解决最重要的问题。本文调查了退出干预的个体与继续干预的个体之间的差异。21名参与者退出了干预,32名仍在干预中。分析的变量包括非法物质使用、甲基苯丙胺依赖的严重程度、酒精使用(区分烈性酒、葡萄酒和啤酒)、改变动机(改变准备问卷)、抑郁和广发焦虑症状、生活满意度和自我效能。结果显示,除了干预前30天喝的啤酒不同外,两组调查对象之间没有差异。(从统计数据来看,辍学组喝的啤酒更多)。结果表明,由于没有任何物质使用或个人特征区分退出和留在干预中,因此需要进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
62
期刊最新文献
Akuamma Seed (Picralima nitida) Use in the U.S.: Findings from a Web-Based Survey. Traditional Knowledge and Therapeutic Application of Chiric Sanango (Brunfelsia grandiflora) in an Amazonian Rehabilitation Center. The Exploration of Cannabis Beverage Substitution for Alcohol: A Novel Harm Reduction Strategy. Social Learning Theory and Gateway Hypothesis as a Causal Pathway Linking Rule-Breaking Peer Association to Marijuana Use via Nicotine Vaping. Associations of Couples' Psychedelic Use with Shared Reality and Relational Well-Being.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1