Comparative study of two common methods for the determination of total mercury in soil.

IF 2.9 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Royal Society Open Science Pub Date : 2025-02-12 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1098/rsos.240757
Pinzhu Qin, Ziyu Cai, Cuilan Wei, Ying Guan, Bowen Li, Jiali Huang, Xiamin Cheng
{"title":"Comparative study of two common methods for the determination of total mercury in soil.","authors":"Pinzhu Qin, Ziyu Cai, Cuilan Wei, Ying Guan, Bowen Li, Jiali Huang, Xiamin Cheng","doi":"10.1098/rsos.240757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cold atomic absorption spectrophotometry and atomic fluorescence methods were employed to ascertain the total mercury concentration in soil samples. A systematic comparison and analysis were conducted on the operational procedures, precision and detection limits of these methodologies. The standard curve for total mercury determination in soil using the atomic fluorescence method is <i>y</i> = 851.98<i>x</i>+16.771 (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.9996, 0-2.5 µg l<sup>-1</sup>), with a detection limit of 0.0006 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>. This method demonstrates superior precision and accuracy not only for samples with high and medium concentrations but also for those with low concentrations. For the cold atomic absorption spectrophotometry method, the standard curve for total mercury determination is <i>y</i> = 0.0547<i>x</i> + 0.0047 (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.9998, 0-15 µg l<sup>-1</sup>). For high-concentration samples, the curve is <i>y</i> = 0.0007<i>x</i> - 0.0003 (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.9998, 0-600 µg l<sup>-1</sup>). The detection limit for this method is 0.06 μg kg<sup>-1</sup>, indicating better sensitivity and accuracy compared with the atomic fluorescence method. While the precision for low-concentration (0.017 ± 0.003 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>) samples is moderate, it is higher for medium (0.030 ± 0.003 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>) and high-concentration (0.590 ± 0.05 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>) samples. Overall, there is no significant difference between the two detection methods. However, the cold atomic absorption spectrophotometry method has the advantage of not requiring pre-treatment, making it more convenient and environment friendly.</p>","PeriodicalId":21525,"journal":{"name":"Royal Society Open Science","volume":"12 2","pages":"240757"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11813565/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Royal Society Open Science","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.240757","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cold atomic absorption spectrophotometry and atomic fluorescence methods were employed to ascertain the total mercury concentration in soil samples. A systematic comparison and analysis were conducted on the operational procedures, precision and detection limits of these methodologies. The standard curve for total mercury determination in soil using the atomic fluorescence method is y = 851.98x+16.771 (R 2 = 0.9996, 0-2.5 µg l-1), with a detection limit of 0.0006 mg kg-1. This method demonstrates superior precision and accuracy not only for samples with high and medium concentrations but also for those with low concentrations. For the cold atomic absorption spectrophotometry method, the standard curve for total mercury determination is y = 0.0547x + 0.0047 (R 2 = 0.9998, 0-15 µg l-1). For high-concentration samples, the curve is y = 0.0007x - 0.0003 (R 2 = 0.9998, 0-600 µg l-1). The detection limit for this method is 0.06 μg kg-1, indicating better sensitivity and accuracy compared with the atomic fluorescence method. While the precision for low-concentration (0.017 ± 0.003 mg kg-1) samples is moderate, it is higher for medium (0.030 ± 0.003 mg kg-1) and high-concentration (0.590 ± 0.05 mg kg-1) samples. Overall, there is no significant difference between the two detection methods. However, the cold atomic absorption spectrophotometry method has the advantage of not requiring pre-treatment, making it more convenient and environment friendly.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土壤中总汞两种常用测定方法的比较研究。
采用冷原子吸收分光光度法和原子荧光法测定土壤样品中总汞浓度。对这些方法的操作程序、精密度和检出限进行了系统的比较和分析。原子荧光法测定土壤中总汞的标准曲线为y = 851.98x+16.771 (r2 = 0.9996, 0 ~ 2.5µg -1),检出限为0.0006 mg kg-1。该方法不仅对高、中浓度样品,而且对低浓度样品也具有较高的精密度和准确性。冷原子吸收分光光度法测定总汞的标准曲线为y = 0.0547x + 0.0047 (r2 = 0.9998, 0 ~ 15µg l-1)。对于高浓度样品,曲线为y = 0.0007x - 0.0003 (r2 = 0.9998, 0-600µg l-1)。该方法的检出限为0.06 μ kg-1,与原子荧光法相比具有更高的灵敏度和准确性。低浓度(0.017±0.003 mg kg-1)样品的精密度一般,中浓度(0.030±0.003 mg kg-1)和高浓度(0.590±0.05 mg kg-1)样品的精密度较高。总体而言,两种检测方法之间没有显著差异。而冷原子吸收分光光度法具有不需要预处理的优点,更加方便、环保。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Royal Society Open Science
Royal Society Open Science Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
508
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Royal Society Open Science is a new open journal publishing high-quality original research across the entire range of science on the basis of objective peer-review. The journal covers the entire range of science and mathematics and will allow the Society to publish all the high-quality work it receives without the usual restrictions on scope, length or impact.
期刊最新文献
Desert lizards modulate nutritional responses to match seasonal biological needs. A dynamical measure of algorithmically infused visibility. Chicks of cavity-nesting birds do not 'exercise' prior to fledging. A total evidence approach justifies taxonomic splitting of the endangered Pecos gambusia into three species. Do scarcity-related cues affect the sustained attentional performance of the poor and the rich differently?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1