Can treatment expectations or treatment itself in patients with arthralgia suspicious for progression to rheumatoid arthritis improve illness perceptions?

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY Rheumatology Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1093/rheumatology/keaf095
Simonetta R G van Griethuysen, Quirine A Dumoulin, Elise van Mulligen, Annette H M van der Helm-van Mil
{"title":"Can treatment expectations or treatment itself in patients with arthralgia suspicious for progression to rheumatoid arthritis improve illness perceptions?","authors":"Simonetta R G van Griethuysen, Quirine A Dumoulin, Elise van Mulligen, Annette H M van der Helm-van Mil","doi":"10.1093/rheumatology/keaf095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Negative illness perceptions(IPs) are associated with poorer disease-outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis(RA). Unfortunately, IPs are generally stable in established RA. We hypothesized that IPs, especially in the cognitive domain, are modifiable in arthralgia-at-risk of RA. We aimed to study if receiving DMARD-treatment, or the offer of DMARD-treatment associates with more positive IPs in patients with clinically-suspect-arthralgia(CSA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The population studied were CSA-patients to which a wait-and-see approach was adopted without offering DMARD-treatment, or patients were offered DMARD-treatment via the TREAT EARLIER-trial and subsequently randomized to receive methotrexate or placebo. IP was assessed using the Brief-Illness-Perception-Questionnaire(BIPQ), covering cognitive, emotional and comprehensibility domains. The effect of DMARD-treatment on IPs over time was studied by comparing the 2-year-course of BIPQs of patients receiving methotrexate or placebo. The effect of offering DMARD-treatment was examined by comparing the BIPQs of CSA-patients in the trial with those undergoing a 'wait-and-see'-policy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total 375 CSA-patients were studied, of which 236 of the TREAT EARLIER-trial and 139 with a wait-and-see approach. Patients who received treatment showed sustained improvements in IPs over time compared with placebo in four cognitive domains: experience of physical complaints(p= 0.040), the illness' influence on life (p= 0.001), treatment-effectiveness(p= 0.041) and disease-duration (p= 0.045). Comparison at baseline showed that CSA-patients to whom treatment was offered had more confidence in treatment (p< 0.001) and tented to have a deeper understanding of their disease (p= 0.054).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both the prospect of and DMARD-treatment itself improved IPs in CSA, mainly in cognitive domains. These data suggest CSA as a suitable time period for influencing IPs', which may provide possibilities to improve disease outcomes in patients developing RA.</p>","PeriodicalId":21255,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keaf095","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Negative illness perceptions(IPs) are associated with poorer disease-outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis(RA). Unfortunately, IPs are generally stable in established RA. We hypothesized that IPs, especially in the cognitive domain, are modifiable in arthralgia-at-risk of RA. We aimed to study if receiving DMARD-treatment, or the offer of DMARD-treatment associates with more positive IPs in patients with clinically-suspect-arthralgia(CSA).

Methods: The population studied were CSA-patients to which a wait-and-see approach was adopted without offering DMARD-treatment, or patients were offered DMARD-treatment via the TREAT EARLIER-trial and subsequently randomized to receive methotrexate or placebo. IP was assessed using the Brief-Illness-Perception-Questionnaire(BIPQ), covering cognitive, emotional and comprehensibility domains. The effect of DMARD-treatment on IPs over time was studied by comparing the 2-year-course of BIPQs of patients receiving methotrexate or placebo. The effect of offering DMARD-treatment was examined by comparing the BIPQs of CSA-patients in the trial with those undergoing a 'wait-and-see'-policy.

Results: In total 375 CSA-patients were studied, of which 236 of the TREAT EARLIER-trial and 139 with a wait-and-see approach. Patients who received treatment showed sustained improvements in IPs over time compared with placebo in four cognitive domains: experience of physical complaints(p= 0.040), the illness' influence on life (p= 0.001), treatment-effectiveness(p= 0.041) and disease-duration (p= 0.045). Comparison at baseline showed that CSA-patients to whom treatment was offered had more confidence in treatment (p< 0.001) and tented to have a deeper understanding of their disease (p= 0.054).

Conclusion: Both the prospect of and DMARD-treatment itself improved IPs in CSA, mainly in cognitive domains. These data suggest CSA as a suitable time period for influencing IPs', which may provide possibilities to improve disease outcomes in patients developing RA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rheumatology
Rheumatology 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1091
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Rheumatology strives to support research and discovery by publishing the highest quality original scientific papers with a focus on basic, clinical and translational research. The journal’s subject areas cover a wide range of paediatric and adult rheumatological conditions from an international perspective. It is an official journal of the British Society for Rheumatology, published by Oxford University Press. Rheumatology publishes original articles, reviews, editorials, guidelines, concise reports, meta-analyses, original case reports, clinical vignettes, letters and matters arising from published material. The journal takes pride in serving the global rheumatology community, with a focus on high societal impact in the form of podcasts, videos and extended social media presence, and utilizing metrics such as Altmetric. Keep up to date by following the journal on Twitter @RheumJnl.
期刊最新文献
Treatment guidelines for idiopathic inflammatory myopathies in adults: a comparative review Prevalence and clinical significance of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in interstitial lung disease: A retrospective cohort study Abatacept and the risk of malignancy: a meta-analysis across disease indications Advancing treatment for idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: insights into immune modulation by JAK inhibition. Efficacy of upadacitinib in treating a paediatric case of refractory Takayasu arteritis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1