Exploring the experiences of hemochromatosis (HHC) patients who undergo therapeutic venesection at a blood collection agency.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Transfusion Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1111/trf.18153
Rachel Thorpe, Barbara Masser, Carley N Gemelli, Elizabeth Knight, Carol Jos, Peter J Bentley, Jan Maddern, Justine O'Donovan, Athina Kakkos, Marijke Welvaert
{"title":"Exploring the experiences of hemochromatosis (HHC) patients who undergo therapeutic venesection at a blood collection agency.","authors":"Rachel Thorpe, Barbara Masser, Carley N Gemelli, Elizabeth Knight, Carol Jos, Peter J Bentley, Jan Maddern, Justine O'Donovan, Athina Kakkos, Marijke Welvaert","doi":"10.1111/trf.18153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with hereditary hemochromatosis (HHC) require therapeutic phlebotomy on an ongoing basis. Little is known about the facilitators and barriers they experience in donating at a blood collection agency (BCA), nor how these impact their willingness to engage in an ongoing relationship with a BCA. This study explored the experiences of HHC donors undergoing therapeutic phlebotomy at the Australian Red Cross Lifeblood (Lifeblood) in Australia.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>All HHC donors who had made at least one donation at Lifeblood in the last 2 years were invited to complete a survey. In this paper, we report the findings on enablers and barriers to donating at Lifeblood, donor and patient identity, communication, knowledge of blood use and of plasma, interest in donating plasma, and engagement in positive word of mouth about donating.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were obtained from 4350 therapeutic donors. Responders identified more enablers than barriers to donating at Lifeblood and 61.8% reported that Lifeblood used their blood. Responders were more likely to identify as donors than patients, and those with a stronger donor than patient identity were significantly more likely to report that their blood was used, had greater interest in donating plasma, and reported engaging in more positive word of mouth about donating.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Findings indicate that BCAs can do more to educate donors with HHC about how their blood is used to help others. Doing so may help to retain them as donors and can be beneficial for the blood supply, as well as for the donors themselves.</p>","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18153","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: People with hereditary hemochromatosis (HHC) require therapeutic phlebotomy on an ongoing basis. Little is known about the facilitators and barriers they experience in donating at a blood collection agency (BCA), nor how these impact their willingness to engage in an ongoing relationship with a BCA. This study explored the experiences of HHC donors undergoing therapeutic phlebotomy at the Australian Red Cross Lifeblood (Lifeblood) in Australia.

Study design and methods: All HHC donors who had made at least one donation at Lifeblood in the last 2 years were invited to complete a survey. In this paper, we report the findings on enablers and barriers to donating at Lifeblood, donor and patient identity, communication, knowledge of blood use and of plasma, interest in donating plasma, and engagement in positive word of mouth about donating.

Results: Data were obtained from 4350 therapeutic donors. Responders identified more enablers than barriers to donating at Lifeblood and 61.8% reported that Lifeblood used their blood. Responders were more likely to identify as donors than patients, and those with a stronger donor than patient identity were significantly more likely to report that their blood was used, had greater interest in donating plasma, and reported engaging in more positive word of mouth about donating.

Discussion: Findings indicate that BCAs can do more to educate donors with HHC about how their blood is used to help others. Doing so may help to retain them as donors and can be beneficial for the blood supply, as well as for the donors themselves.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transfusion
Transfusion 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
20.70%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: TRANSFUSION is the foremost publication in the world for new information regarding transfusion medicine. Written by and for members of AABB and other health-care workers, TRANSFUSION reports on the latest technical advances, discusses opposing viewpoints regarding controversial issues, and presents key conference proceedings. In addition to blood banking and transfusion medicine topics, TRANSFUSION presents submissions concerning patient blood management, tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular, and gene therapies.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the experiences of hemochromatosis (HHC) patients who undergo therapeutic venesection at a blood collection agency. Deglycerolization of manually glycerolized, frozen red cell concentrates using a closed system cell processor. Genetic background of anti-CD99 producers in Japan and analysis of hemolytic transfusion reactions due to anti-CD99. Misoprostol administration mimicking a febrile transfusion reaction. Low-titer group O whole blood implementation in a tertiary care hospital in Estonia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1