Improvement in Skin Fibrosis and Lung Function with Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Systemic Sclerosis.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1016/j.jtct.2025.02.005
Nancy Maltez, Mianbo Wang, Georges A Wells, Peter Tugwell, Murray Baron, Zora Marjanovic, Pauline Lansiaux, Dominique Farge, Marie Hudson
{"title":"Improvement in Skin Fibrosis and Lung Function with Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Systemic Sclerosis.","authors":"Nancy Maltez, Mianbo Wang, Georges A Wells, Peter Tugwell, Murray Baron, Zora Marjanovic, Pauline Lansiaux, Dominique Farge, Marie Hudson","doi":"10.1016/j.jtct.2025.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a severe, progressive disease with limited treatment options. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) has been shown to be an effective treatment for rapidly progressive SSc. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of AHSCT for SSc compared to real-world clinical care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SSc patients from France who underwent AHSCT were compared to patients from Canada who met criteria for AHSCT (as defined in the ASTIS trial) but received conventional care. The primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes included modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) and forced vital capacity (FVC). Overall survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Measures of mRSS and FVC were compared using linear regression models. Analyses were adjusted for baseline scores and incorporated stabilized inverse probability of treatment weights to account for confounding by indication. Propensity scores were estimated using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-one AHSCT patients and 85 conventional care patients were compared. AHSCT was associated with a suggestive, though not statistically significant trend towards improvement in overall survival (log-rank p=0.115; Figure 1). In follow-up, the mRSS was lower with AHSCT compared to conventional care: between group difference of 8.81; p≤0.0001 at 12 months and 11.28; p=0.011 at 60 months. There was no significant difference in FVC between groups at 12 months but at 24 months, AHSCT was associated with a higher FVC (between group difference of 10.53 (p=0.05)).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates with real-world long-term data that compared with conventional care, treatment with AHSCT may offer superior outcomes for SSc patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23283,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtct.2025.02.005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a severe, progressive disease with limited treatment options. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) has been shown to be an effective treatment for rapidly progressive SSc. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of AHSCT for SSc compared to real-world clinical care.

Methods: SSc patients from France who underwent AHSCT were compared to patients from Canada who met criteria for AHSCT (as defined in the ASTIS trial) but received conventional care. The primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes included modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) and forced vital capacity (FVC). Overall survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Measures of mRSS and FVC were compared using linear regression models. Analyses were adjusted for baseline scores and incorporated stabilized inverse probability of treatment weights to account for confounding by indication. Propensity scores were estimated using logistic regression.

Results: Forty-one AHSCT patients and 85 conventional care patients were compared. AHSCT was associated with a suggestive, though not statistically significant trend towards improvement in overall survival (log-rank p=0.115; Figure 1). In follow-up, the mRSS was lower with AHSCT compared to conventional care: between group difference of 8.81; p≤0.0001 at 12 months and 11.28; p=0.011 at 60 months. There was no significant difference in FVC between groups at 12 months but at 24 months, AHSCT was associated with a higher FVC (between group difference of 10.53 (p=0.05)).

Conclusion: This study demonstrates with real-world long-term data that compared with conventional care, treatment with AHSCT may offer superior outcomes for SSc patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
15.60%
发文量
1061
审稿时长
51 days
期刊最新文献
Umbilical cord blood reduced relapse but increased non-relapse mortality compared to matched unrelated donor transplantation in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia with active disease: A CIBMTR 2008-2017 analysis of donor source and residual disease. Younger Children with Non-Malignant Disease Have Increased Incidence of Mixed Myeloid Chimerism After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation with Busulfan-Based Conditioning. Improvement in Skin Fibrosis and Lung Function with Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Systemic Sclerosis. American Society of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Series: #8- Management and Prevention of Non-Aspergillus Molds in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Recipients. Longitudinal tear cytokine biomarkers: an analysis from the Close Assessment and Testing for Chronic Graft-vs.-Host disease (CATCH) protocol: Predictive tear cytokine biomarkers for ocular GVHD.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1