Cognition and obstructive sleep apnea in Parkinson's disease: randomized controlled trial of positive airway pressure.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine Sleep Pub Date : 2025-07-11 DOI:10.1093/sleep/zsaf038
Annie C Lajoie, Anne-Louise Lafontaine, R John Kimoff, Andrea Benedetti, Ann R Robinson, Marie Létourneau, Joelle Crane, Amanda Scanga, Francine Noel, Marta Kaminska
{"title":"Cognition and obstructive sleep apnea in Parkinson's disease: randomized controlled trial of positive airway pressure.","authors":"Annie C Lajoie, Anne-Louise Lafontaine, R John Kimoff, Andrea Benedetti, Ann R Robinson, Marie Létourneau, Joelle Crane, Amanda Scanga, Francine Noel, Marta Kaminska","doi":"10.1093/sleep/zsaf038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>This randomized controlled trial assessed the effects of positive airway pressure (PAP) treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) on cognition in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individuals with PD with Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) ≤ 27 and OSA were randomized to PAP or nasal dilator strips (placebo) for 6 months. The primary outcome was the change in MoCA from baseline to 6 months compared by t-test between groups by intention to treat (ITT). Sensitivity and per protocol (PP) analyses were performed, adjusting for potential confounders. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported and motor outcomes. Exploratory outcomes comprised detailed neurocognitive tests.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We randomized 94 participants (31% female) with a mean age of 67.3 (standard deviation 10.5) years, body mass index of 28.1 (4.7) kg/m2, and MoCA of 22.7 (3.5). The change in MoCA in the PAP group (n = 48) was 0.60, 95% CI [-0.08, 1.29] and in the control group (n = 46) -0.39, 95% CI [-1.21, 0.43]; between-group difference 1.00, 95% CI [-0.06, 2.05] (ITT). Adjusted ITT analyses showed improved MoCA by 1.44, 95% CI [0.09, 2.79], in treated versus control groups. In PP analyses, the adjusted between-group difference was 1.43, 95% CI [0.054, 2.81] between PAP (n = 33) versus control (n = 41) groups. Nonmotor symptoms, depression and sleep quality scores, and performance on certain executive and psychomotor tasks improved with PAP. PP analyses also showed significant improvement in motor function in PAP compared to control groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evaluation for OSA in PD patients with reduced cognition should be considered as OSA treatment may improve cognitive function, and possibly patient-reported and motor outcomes.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial information: </strong>Registered as \"Cognition and Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Parkinson's Disease, Effect of Positive Airway Pressure Therapy (COPE-PAP)\" at ClinicalTrials.gov. ID: NCT02209363. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02209363?term=kaminska&rank=4.</p>","PeriodicalId":22018,"journal":{"name":"Sleep","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12246369/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsaf038","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objectives: This randomized controlled trial assessed the effects of positive airway pressure (PAP) treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) on cognition in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD).

Methods: Individuals with PD with Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) ≤ 27 and OSA were randomized to PAP or nasal dilator strips (placebo) for 6 months. The primary outcome was the change in MoCA from baseline to 6 months compared by t-test between groups by intention to treat (ITT). Sensitivity and per protocol (PP) analyses were performed, adjusting for potential confounders. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported and motor outcomes. Exploratory outcomes comprised detailed neurocognitive tests.

Findings: We randomized 94 participants (31% female) with a mean age of 67.3 (standard deviation 10.5) years, body mass index of 28.1 (4.7) kg/m2, and MoCA of 22.7 (3.5). The change in MoCA in the PAP group (n = 48) was 0.60, 95% CI [-0.08, 1.29] and in the control group (n = 46) -0.39, 95% CI [-1.21, 0.43]; between-group difference 1.00, 95% CI [-0.06, 2.05] (ITT). Adjusted ITT analyses showed improved MoCA by 1.44, 95% CI [0.09, 2.79], in treated versus control groups. In PP analyses, the adjusted between-group difference was 1.43, 95% CI [0.054, 2.81] between PAP (n = 33) versus control (n = 41) groups. Nonmotor symptoms, depression and sleep quality scores, and performance on certain executive and psychomotor tasks improved with PAP. PP analyses also showed significant improvement in motor function in PAP compared to control groups.

Conclusions: Evaluation for OSA in PD patients with reduced cognition should be considered as OSA treatment may improve cognitive function, and possibly patient-reported and motor outcomes.

Clinical trial information: Registered as "Cognition and Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Parkinson's Disease, Effect of Positive Airway Pressure Therapy (COPE-PAP)" at ClinicalTrials.gov. ID: NCT02209363. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02209363?term=kaminska&rank=4.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
帕金森病的认知和阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停:气道正压随机对照试验(COPE-PAP试验)
研究目的:本随机对照试验评估气道正压通气(PAP)治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)对帕金森病(PD)患者认知能力的影响。方法:蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA) < 27和OSA的PD患者随机接受PAP或鼻扩张片(安慰剂)治疗6个月。主要结局是MoCA从基线到6个月的变化,通过t检验比较各组间治疗意向(ITT)。进行敏感性和每个方案(PP)分析,调整潜在的混杂因素。次要结局包括患者报告和运动结局。探索性结果包括详细的神经认知测试。结果:94名参与者(31%为女性),平均年龄67.3岁(SD 10.5),体重指数28.1 (4.7)kg/m2, MoCA 22.7(3.5)。PAP组(n=48) MoCA变化为0.60,95%CI[-0.08, 1.29],对照组(n=46) MoCA变化为-0.39,95%CI [-1.21, 0.43];组间差异1.00,95%CI [-0.06, 2.05] (ITT)。调整后的ITT分析显示,治疗组与对照组相比,MoCA改善了1.44,95%CI[0.09, 2.79]。在PP分析中,PAP组(n=33)与对照组(n=41)的校正组间差异为1.43,95%CI[0.054, 2.81]。非运动症状、抑郁和睡眠质量评分,以及某些执行和精神运动任务的表现,都在PAP治疗后得到改善。PP分析还显示,与对照组相比,PAP患者的运动功能有显著改善。结论:认知能力下降的PD患者应考虑对OSA的评估,因为OSA治疗可能改善认知功能,并可能改善患者报告的和运动预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sleep
Sleep Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
10.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: SLEEP® publishes findings from studies conducted at any level of analysis, including: Genes Molecules Cells Physiology Neural systems and circuits Behavior and cognition Self-report SLEEP® publishes articles that use a wide variety of scientific approaches and address a broad range of topics. These may include, but are not limited to: Basic and neuroscience studies of sleep and circadian mechanisms In vitro and animal models of sleep, circadian rhythms, and human disorders Pre-clinical human investigations, including the measurement and manipulation of sleep and circadian rhythms Studies in clinical or population samples. These may address factors influencing sleep and circadian rhythms (e.g., development and aging, and social and environmental influences) and relationships between sleep, circadian rhythms, health, and disease Clinical trials, epidemiology studies, implementation, and dissemination research.
期刊最新文献
Pragmatic support or ENDS effect? Interpreting sleep outcomes in a smoking-cessation trial. Using Neural Networks to Complement Oximetry in Infant Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Working on Baby Steps. Subjective sleep disruption, coping, and anxiety and related symptoms in the perinatal period: Findings from a longitudinal study. Hypothalamic volume reduction in adult patients with Narcolepsy type 1. Multicenter evaluation of the Waveband System for automated sleep assessment in patients with insomnia symptoms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1