Return to sport tests: Do they reduce risk of re-rupture after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?

David Figueroa Poblete, Waldo Gonzalez Duque, Daniela Landea Caroca, Camila Tapia Castillo, Daniela Erskine Ventura
{"title":"Return to sport tests: Do they reduce risk of re-rupture after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?","authors":"David Figueroa Poblete, Waldo Gonzalez Duque, Daniela Landea Caroca, Camila Tapia Castillo, Daniela Erskine Ventura","doi":"10.1016/j.jisako.2025.100399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is one of the most common knee injuries. Despite the effectiveness of reconstruction, re-rupture rates of up to 15% have been reported. Static and dynamic test of strength and movement control have been used to determine when return to sports (RTS) is appropriate.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether successfully passing return to sport (RTS) tests reduces the re-rupture rate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study. Patients who underwent ACL reconstruction (ACLR) from June 2018 to May 2023, and who performed RTS tests after rehabilitation, were analyzed. Patients who, in addition to ACLR, underwent extra-articular tenodesis, osteotomy, or multiligament injuries were excluded. RTS tests included: Repeat Sprint Ability (RSA), Dynamic Valgus, Proagility, Unilateral Counter Movement Jump (CMJ), Isokinetic, Triple Hop Test, and Functional Movement Screen (FMS). All statistical analyses were performed with STATA version 18.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>95 patients underwent RTS tests after ACLR, with a follow-up time of 27.8 months. 71.6% of patients were men with a mean age of 25.15 ± 10.7 years. The overall re-rupture rate was 13.68% (13 patients). When comparing patients who passed and did not pass the RTS tests, there were no differences by sex (p=0.06) or age (p=0.11). The only statistically significant difference between the groups was the mean risk score (passed: 11.5 ± 0.7 vs. not passed: 15.5 ± 2.1; p<0.001). Patients with re-rupture were more likely to be from the non-passed group (passed: 0% v/s not passed: 18.1%; p= 0.03), with a statistical power of 0.70.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our records show that passing RTS test after an ACLR could guarantee the absence of re-rupture in the medium term.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":36847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"100399"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisako.2025.100399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is one of the most common knee injuries. Despite the effectiveness of reconstruction, re-rupture rates of up to 15% have been reported. Static and dynamic test of strength and movement control have been used to determine when return to sports (RTS) is appropriate.

Objective: To determine whether successfully passing return to sport (RTS) tests reduces the re-rupture rate.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study. Patients who underwent ACL reconstruction (ACLR) from June 2018 to May 2023, and who performed RTS tests after rehabilitation, were analyzed. Patients who, in addition to ACLR, underwent extra-articular tenodesis, osteotomy, or multiligament injuries were excluded. RTS tests included: Repeat Sprint Ability (RSA), Dynamic Valgus, Proagility, Unilateral Counter Movement Jump (CMJ), Isokinetic, Triple Hop Test, and Functional Movement Screen (FMS). All statistical analyses were performed with STATA version 18.0.

Results: 95 patients underwent RTS tests after ACLR, with a follow-up time of 27.8 months. 71.6% of patients were men with a mean age of 25.15 ± 10.7 years. The overall re-rupture rate was 13.68% (13 patients). When comparing patients who passed and did not pass the RTS tests, there were no differences by sex (p=0.06) or age (p=0.11). The only statistically significant difference between the groups was the mean risk score (passed: 11.5 ± 0.7 vs. not passed: 15.5 ± 2.1; p<0.001). Patients with re-rupture were more likely to be from the non-passed group (passed: 0% v/s not passed: 18.1%; p= 0.03), with a statistical power of 0.70.

Conclusion: Our records show that passing RTS test after an ACLR could guarantee the absence of re-rupture in the medium term.

Level of evidence: Level IV.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
61
审稿时长
108 days
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of Peri-Articular and Peri-Hamstring Injections for Postoperative Pain Management in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Autograft: A Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial. American Academy of Orthopedic Surgery OrthoInfo provides more readable information regarding rotator cuff injury than ChatGPT. Return to sport tests: Do they reduce risk of re-rupture after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Associations Between Hip Cartilage Lesions and Morphologic Parameters of Bony Structures in a Cohort of Asian Patients with Labral Tears Measured Using a Computed Tomography-Based Software System. Beyond the Stitch: Optimizing meniscal repairs and managing failures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1