Nomogram Diagnostic Utility in Prostate Cancer Staging: An Excellent Diagnostic Tool for Prostate Cancer Staging.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Archivos Espanoles De Urologia Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20257801.13
Zhaoyin Wang, Xianyou Wang, Zhenhua Yang, Yizhai Ye, Aizhu Sheng
{"title":"Nomogram Diagnostic Utility in Prostate Cancer Staging: An Excellent Diagnostic Tool for Prostate Cancer Staging.","authors":"Zhaoyin Wang, Xianyou Wang, Zhenhua Yang, Yizhai Ye, Aizhu Sheng","doi":"10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20257801.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/purpose: </strong>Prostate cancer is a prevalent malignancy with high incidence and mortality rates. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) at 3.0Tesla (3.0T) offers high-resolution imaging to visualise tumour characteristics. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic and staging utility of 3.0T mpMRI in prostate cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, patients suspected of having prostate cancer and admitted to our hospital between March 2022 to March 2024 underwent 3.0T mpMRI and prostate biopsy. Patients were staged in accordance with TNM classification (Groups I-II and III-IV). The diagnostic accuracy of mpMRI was assessed using Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Version 2.1 scores, tumour characteristics, signal intensities, radiomic features and biomarker levels. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), multivariate logistic regression and joint model analyses were employed to identify factors influencing cancer progression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Amongst the 110 patients, 74 were in Groups I-II, and 36 in Groups III-IV. The diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity of mpMRI exceeded 90%. Significant differences were observed in Gleason scores, tumour size, location, volume, signal intensities, PI-RADS scores, radiomic features and biomarker levels (<i>p</i> < 0.05). LASSO regression analysis identified nine key variables, and logistic regression analysis revealed that Gleason scores, tumour size, PI-RADS score, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were significantly associated with prostate cancer staging (<i>p</i> < 0.05). A predictive model was developed based on the five variables, and the receiver operating characteristic of 0.976 demonstrated excellent discriminatory power for the model. The calibration curve closely aligns with the diagonal line, indicating excellent calibration. Decision curve analysis shows net benefits across various threshold probabilities, highlighting its potential for informing clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study developed a predictive model for prostate cancer staging using multiparametric MRI, radiomic features and clinical data, showing strong potential for early diagnosis and prognostic evaluation. Future advancements in imaging technology and machine learning techniques may further enhance its clinical impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":48852,"journal":{"name":"Archivos Espanoles De Urologia","volume":"78 1","pages":"100-108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos Espanoles De Urologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20257801.13","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/purpose: Prostate cancer is a prevalent malignancy with high incidence and mortality rates. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) at 3.0Tesla (3.0T) offers high-resolution imaging to visualise tumour characteristics. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic and staging utility of 3.0T mpMRI in prostate cancer.

Methods: In this retrospective study, patients suspected of having prostate cancer and admitted to our hospital between March 2022 to March 2024 underwent 3.0T mpMRI and prostate biopsy. Patients were staged in accordance with TNM classification (Groups I-II and III-IV). The diagnostic accuracy of mpMRI was assessed using Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Version 2.1 scores, tumour characteristics, signal intensities, radiomic features and biomarker levels. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), multivariate logistic regression and joint model analyses were employed to identify factors influencing cancer progression.

Results: Amongst the 110 patients, 74 were in Groups I-II, and 36 in Groups III-IV. The diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity of mpMRI exceeded 90%. Significant differences were observed in Gleason scores, tumour size, location, volume, signal intensities, PI-RADS scores, radiomic features and biomarker levels (p < 0.05). LASSO regression analysis identified nine key variables, and logistic regression analysis revealed that Gleason scores, tumour size, PI-RADS score, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were significantly associated with prostate cancer staging (p < 0.05). A predictive model was developed based on the five variables, and the receiver operating characteristic of 0.976 demonstrated excellent discriminatory power for the model. The calibration curve closely aligns with the diagonal line, indicating excellent calibration. Decision curve analysis shows net benefits across various threshold probabilities, highlighting its potential for informing clinical decision-making.

Conclusions: This study developed a predictive model for prostate cancer staging using multiparametric MRI, radiomic features and clinical data, showing strong potential for early diagnosis and prognostic evaluation. Future advancements in imaging technology and machine learning techniques may further enhance its clinical impact.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前列腺癌分期的Nomogram诊断工具:前列腺癌分期的优秀诊断工具。
背景/目的:前列腺癌是一种发病率高、死亡率高的常见恶性肿瘤。3.0特斯拉(3.0T)的多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)提供高分辨率成像以显示肿瘤特征。本研究旨在评估3.0T mpMRI在前列腺癌诊断和分期中的应用。方法:回顾性研究2022年3月至2024年3月间我院收治的疑似前列腺癌患者,行3.0T mpMRI及前列腺活检检查。根据TNM分期分为I-II组和III-IV组。采用前列腺成像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS) 2.1版评分、肿瘤特征、信号强度、放射学特征和生物标志物水平评估mpMRI的诊断准确性。采用最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)、多元逻辑回归和联合模型分析来确定影响癌症进展的因素。结果:110例患者中,I-II组74例,III-IV组36例。mpMRI的诊断正确率和灵敏度均超过90%。两组在Gleason评分、肿瘤大小、位置、体积、信号强度、PI-RADS评分、放射学特征和生物标志物水平上差异均有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。LASSO回归分析确定了9个关键变量,logistic回归分析显示Gleason评分、肿瘤大小、PI-RADS评分、表观扩散系数(ADC)值和前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平与前列腺癌分期有显著相关性(p < 0.05)。基于这5个变量建立了预测模型,受试者工作特征值为0.976,表明该模型具有良好的判别能力。校准曲线与对角线紧密对齐,表明校准效果良好。决策曲线分析显示了各种阈值概率的净收益,突出了其为临床决策提供信息的潜力。结论:本研究建立了一种基于多参数MRI、放射学特征和临床数据的前列腺癌分期预测模型,在早期诊断和预后评估方面具有很强的潜力。未来成像技术和机器学习技术的进步可能会进一步增强其临床影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archivos Espanoles De Urologia
Archivos Espanoles De Urologia UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Archivos Españoles de Urología published since 1944, is an international peer review, susbscription Journal on Urology with original and review articles on different subjets in Urology: oncology, endourology, laparoscopic, andrology, lithiasis, pediatrics , urodynamics,... Case Report are also admitted.
期刊最新文献
Two-Port Laparoscopic Palomo Varicocelectomy with Indocyanine Green-Assisted Lymphatic Preservation: A Technical Note. Who is Next? Impact of Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index and De Ritis Ratio for Predicting 90-Day Survival after Salvage Cystectomy in Advanced Bladder Cancer. Predictive Model Integrating Imaging and Inflammatory Biomarkers for Preoperative Urinary Tract Infection in Patients with Ureteral Calculi and Metabolic Syndrome. Aetiological Description of Urinary Tract Infections in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Construction of a Clinical Prediction Model: A Retrospective Study. The Naples Prognostic Score Predicts the Biochemical Recurrence of Patients Treated with Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1