Validation of an Environmental Exposure Chamber for Assessment of Allergy to Grass Pollen.

I García-Gutiérrez, C Solórzano-Zepeda, V Sánchez-García, E Ramírez-Mateo, D Antolín-Amérigo, Y Zheng, A Rioja Carrera, I León Hernando, M E Hernando Pérez, B De la Hoz Caballer
{"title":"Validation of an Environmental Exposure Chamber for Assessment of Allergy to Grass Pollen.","authors":"I García-Gutiérrez, C Solórzano-Zepeda, V Sánchez-García, E Ramírez-Mateo, D Antolín-Amérigo, Y Zheng, A Rioja Carrera, I León Hernando, M E Hernando Pérez, B De la Hoz Caballer","doi":"10.18176/jiaci.1036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An environmental exposure chamber (EEC) is a health facility that enables allergic symptoms to be induced in a controlled manner in persons sensitized to a dispersed allergen. We performed a study at our institution to technically and clinically validate an EEC in patients allergic to grass pollen.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a new EEC inside a clean room (ISO-8 class) measuring 15.6 m². During the technical validation, the patient's exposure conditions were simulated by ensuring homogeneous distribution of the allergen with a particle disperser and monitoring both particle and pollen grain concentrations. Temperature, pressure, and humidity were also registered. A total of 31 volunteers were exposed to Phleum pratense pollen in the EEC. Of these, 25 were allergic (cases), with symptoms of rhinoconjunctivitis with or without asthma, and 6 were not (controls). One control and 2 cases were exposed twice to check reproducibility, generating a total of 34 challenges. The test was stopped once the positivity criterion was reached or the patient completed 90 minutes in the EEC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both the stability of particle concentrations and approximation to the pollen sample concentration were guaranteed. All challenges with controls were negative. Among the cases, 15% of challenges were negative and 85% were positive. No severe or late reactions were observed. Volunteers exposed twice to the same pollen had the same result in both challenges.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our EEC proved to be a specific, safe, and reproducible tool for the diagnosis of grass pollen allergy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50173,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology","volume":" ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18176/jiaci.1036","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: An environmental exposure chamber (EEC) is a health facility that enables allergic symptoms to be induced in a controlled manner in persons sensitized to a dispersed allergen. We performed a study at our institution to technically and clinically validate an EEC in patients allergic to grass pollen.

Methods: We developed a new EEC inside a clean room (ISO-8 class) measuring 15.6 m². During the technical validation, the patient's exposure conditions were simulated by ensuring homogeneous distribution of the allergen with a particle disperser and monitoring both particle and pollen grain concentrations. Temperature, pressure, and humidity were also registered. A total of 31 volunteers were exposed to Phleum pratense pollen in the EEC. Of these, 25 were allergic (cases), with symptoms of rhinoconjunctivitis with or without asthma, and 6 were not (controls). One control and 2 cases were exposed twice to check reproducibility, generating a total of 34 challenges. The test was stopped once the positivity criterion was reached or the patient completed 90 minutes in the EEC.

Results: Both the stability of particle concentrations and approximation to the pollen sample concentration were guaranteed. All challenges with controls were negative. Among the cases, 15% of challenges were negative and 85% were positive. No severe or late reactions were observed. Volunteers exposed twice to the same pollen had the same result in both challenges.

Conclusion: Our EEC proved to be a specific, safe, and reproducible tool for the diagnosis of grass pollen allergy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
9.70%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology (J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol) provides an attractive and very active forum for basic and clinical research in allergology and clinical immunology.Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology publishes original works, reviews, short communications and opinions.
期刊最新文献
Factors Affecting the Safety and Effectiveness of Venom Immunotherapy. LAD2 Mast Cell Activation Test Associates With the Reaction Severity and Diagnoses BAT Nonresponders in Hymenoptera Venom Allergy. Sunflower (Helianthus annuus) Seed Allergy. How Far Are We From Achieving Delabeling of False Penicillin/ß-Lactam Allergy Alerts? A Population Problem. Nonmandatory Labeled Legumes Are an Emergent Safety Concern: An Illustrative Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1