Suicide-Risk Identification Across Developmental and Behavioral Pediatric Practices: A DBPNet Study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Academic Pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1016/j.acap.2025.102793
Kate E Wallis, Sarah N Wozniak-Kelly, Jaclyn Cacia, Katherine K Wu, Cy Nadler
{"title":"Suicide-Risk Identification Across Developmental and Behavioral Pediatric Practices: A DBPNet Study.","authors":"Kate E Wallis, Sarah N Wozniak-Kelly, Jaclyn Cacia, Katherine K Wu, Cy Nadler","doi":"10.1016/j.acap.2025.102793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Identification of suicide risk among individuals with autism and other intellectual/developmental disabilities (IDD) is increasingly required by developmental-behavioral pediatric (DBP), psychology and psychiatry practices that frequently serve these populations. Improved understanding of current practice for risk identification is needed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify variations in practices, facilitators of and barriers to universal suicide screening of children and adolescents with IDDs in pediatric developmental and behavioral health settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Centers from the Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics Research Network (DBPNet) were invited to describe suicide-screening practices in their developmental-behavioral pediatrics, psychology, and/or psychiatry clinics. A representative per site/specialty was asked to complete surveys (summarized with descriptive statistics) and semi-structured interviews (summarized using thematic analysis) to explore sites' current practices, and barriers/facilitators to screening.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants included 34 survey respondents and 21 interviewees.Surveys revealed variation in suicide screening practices across sites; 44.1% of respondents reported that their practice conducts universal screening, but the screening processes varied widely. Interviews identified some facilitators to screening youth with IDD, such as standardizing procedures, training, and having staff available to respond to positive screens. Barriers to universal screening include factors at the patient, family, provider, and system levels. Insufficient mental health care systems, as well as a lack of IDD-specific supports, are significant challenges.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite Joint Commission requirements and specific expertise in behavioral health, sites serving patients with IDD vary widely in how suicide screening is implemented and how positive screens are addressed. Findings offer opportunities to standardize procedures to increase suicide risk identification and response.</p>","PeriodicalId":50930,"journal":{"name":"Academic Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"102793"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2025.102793","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Identification of suicide risk among individuals with autism and other intellectual/developmental disabilities (IDD) is increasingly required by developmental-behavioral pediatric (DBP), psychology and psychiatry practices that frequently serve these populations. Improved understanding of current practice for risk identification is needed.

Objective: To identify variations in practices, facilitators of and barriers to universal suicide screening of children and adolescents with IDDs in pediatric developmental and behavioral health settings.

Methods: Centers from the Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics Research Network (DBPNet) were invited to describe suicide-screening practices in their developmental-behavioral pediatrics, psychology, and/or psychiatry clinics. A representative per site/specialty was asked to complete surveys (summarized with descriptive statistics) and semi-structured interviews (summarized using thematic analysis) to explore sites' current practices, and barriers/facilitators to screening.

Results: Participants included 34 survey respondents and 21 interviewees.Surveys revealed variation in suicide screening practices across sites; 44.1% of respondents reported that their practice conducts universal screening, but the screening processes varied widely. Interviews identified some facilitators to screening youth with IDD, such as standardizing procedures, training, and having staff available to respond to positive screens. Barriers to universal screening include factors at the patient, family, provider, and system levels. Insufficient mental health care systems, as well as a lack of IDD-specific supports, are significant challenges.

Conclusions: Despite Joint Commission requirements and specific expertise in behavioral health, sites serving patients with IDD vary widely in how suicide screening is implemented and how positive screens are addressed. Findings offer opportunities to standardize procedures to increase suicide risk identification and response.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Pediatrics
Academic Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.90%
发文量
300
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Academic Pediatrics, the official journal of the Academic Pediatric Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to strengthen the research and educational base of academic general pediatrics. The journal provides leadership in pediatric education, research, patient care and advocacy. Content areas include pediatric education, emergency medicine, injury, abuse, behavioral pediatrics, holistic medicine, child health services and health policy,and the environment. The journal provides an active forum for the presentation of pediatric educational research in diverse settings, involving medical students, residents, fellows, and practicing professionals. The journal also emphasizes important research relating to the quality of child health care, health care policy, and the organization of child health services. It also includes systematic reviews of primary care interventions and important methodologic papers to aid research in child health and education.
期刊最新文献
Association of Food Insecurity with Mental Health Outcomes in Parents and Children during the COVID-19 Pandemic. A Year in (Re)View from the Association of Pediatric Program Directors: 40th Anniversary Edition. Teaching Pediatrics Residents a Communication Framework for Delivering Difficult News: A randomized Controlled Trial of Practice Methods. Cost of Intentional Drug Overdose and Other Self-Harm Among Youth in the U.S., 2021. Serious Neurologic Events with Seasonal Influenza in Young Children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1