Analysis on the Impact of U.S. FDA's Narrow Therapeutic Index Bioequivalence Criteria on Generic Drug Applications.

IF 5 3区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY AAPS Journal Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1208/s12248-025-01020-1
Krista Anim Anno, Mirette Mina, Zhen Zhang, Lei Zhang, Wenlei Jiang
{"title":"Analysis on the Impact of U.S. FDA's Narrow Therapeutic Index Bioequivalence Criteria on Generic Drug Applications.","authors":"Krista Anim Anno, Mirette Mina, Zhen Zhang, Lei Zhang, Wenlei Jiang","doi":"10.1208/s12248-025-01020-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since 2012, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has developed classification criteria of narrow therapeutic index (NTI) drug products and tightened bioequivalence (BE) standards for these products by recommending a fully replicated, two-sequence, two-treatment, four-period crossover study design where BE is based on passing both scaled average BE criterion and within-subject variability comparison criterion, as well as the average BE criterion of 80.00%-125.00%. Currently, the BE study design and criteria for NTI drugs are somewhat different across regulatory agencies. The objective of this study is to survey pharmacokinetic BE data of abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs) of NTI drugs submitted to the FDA with initial submission dates between January 1, 2013 and October 1, 2022 to identify the impact of FDA's current BE approach on generic NTI approval. Thirty-three NTI drug products from 100 ANDAs were identified with 93 ANDAs included in analysis. Eighty-seven ANDAs had four-way crossover studies, with 69 and 106 fed and fasting BE studies, respectively. For all NTI drugs, the range of average S<sub>WR</sub> for C<sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>t</sub>, and AUC<sub>inf</sub> was between 0.05 and 0.27. Of the 20 studies that failed BE, 90%, 5%, and 5% failed reference scaled criteria only, variability comparison criteria only, and both, respectively. Further communication of this work with global regulatory agencies and the scientific community will help better understand current FDA NTI BE criteria and review experiences. These efforts will support the development of harmonized BE criteria for NTI drugs, in turn improving patient access to generic NTI drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50934,"journal":{"name":"AAPS Journal","volume":"27 1","pages":"42"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAPS Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-025-01020-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since 2012, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has developed classification criteria of narrow therapeutic index (NTI) drug products and tightened bioequivalence (BE) standards for these products by recommending a fully replicated, two-sequence, two-treatment, four-period crossover study design where BE is based on passing both scaled average BE criterion and within-subject variability comparison criterion, as well as the average BE criterion of 80.00%-125.00%. Currently, the BE study design and criteria for NTI drugs are somewhat different across regulatory agencies. The objective of this study is to survey pharmacokinetic BE data of abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs) of NTI drugs submitted to the FDA with initial submission dates between January 1, 2013 and October 1, 2022 to identify the impact of FDA's current BE approach on generic NTI approval. Thirty-three NTI drug products from 100 ANDAs were identified with 93 ANDAs included in analysis. Eighty-seven ANDAs had four-way crossover studies, with 69 and 106 fed and fasting BE studies, respectively. For all NTI drugs, the range of average SWR for Cmax, AUCt, and AUCinf was between 0.05 and 0.27. Of the 20 studies that failed BE, 90%, 5%, and 5% failed reference scaled criteria only, variability comparison criteria only, and both, respectively. Further communication of this work with global regulatory agencies and the scientific community will help better understand current FDA NTI BE criteria and review experiences. These efforts will support the development of harmonized BE criteria for NTI drugs, in turn improving patient access to generic NTI drugs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自 2012 年以来,美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)制定了窄治疗指数(NTI)药物产品的分类标准,并收紧了这些产品的生物等效性(BE)标准,建议采用完全重复、两序、两疗程、四疗程的交叉研究设计,BE 基于通过比例平均 BE 标准和受试者内变异性比较标准,以及 80.00%-125.00% 的平均 BE 标准。目前,各监管机构对 NTI 药物的 BE 研究设计和标准存在一定差异。本研究旨在调查首次提交日期在 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 10 月 1 日之间、提交给 FDA 的 NTI 药物简略新药申请(ANDA)的药代动力学 BE 数据,以确定 FDA 现行 BE 方法对 NTI 仿制药审批的影响。从 100 份 ANDA 中确定了 33 种 NTI 药物产品,其中 93 份 ANDA 纳入了分析。87项ANDA进行了四向交叉研究,分别有69项和106项进食和空腹BE研究。所有 NTI 药物的 Cmax、AUCt 和 AUCinf 的平均 SWR 范围介于 0.05 和 0.27 之间。在 20 项未通过 BE 的研究中,分别有 90%、5% 和 5%的研究仅未通过参考比例标准、仅未通过变异性比较标准或两者均未通过。与全球监管机构和科学界进一步交流这项工作将有助于更好地了解当前的 FDA NTI BE 标准和审查经验。这些努力将有助于制定统一的 NTI 药物 BE 标准,进而改善患者获得非专利 NTI 药物的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AAPS Journal
AAPS Journal 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.40%
发文量
109
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The AAPS Journal, an official journal of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS), publishes novel and significant findings in the various areas of pharmaceutical sciences impacting human and veterinary therapeutics, including: · Drug Design and Discovery · Pharmaceutical Biotechnology · Biopharmaceutics, Formulation, and Drug Delivery · Metabolism and Transport · Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacometrics · Translational Research · Clinical Evaluations and Therapeutic Outcomes · Regulatory Science We invite submissions under the following article types: · Original Research Articles · Reviews and Mini-reviews · White Papers, Commentaries, and Editorials · Meeting Reports · Brief/Technical Reports and Rapid Communications · Regulatory Notes · Tutorials · Protocols in the Pharmaceutical Sciences In addition, The AAPS Journal publishes themes, organized by guest editors, which are focused on particular areas of current interest to our field.
期刊最新文献
Stability of Anti-Drug Antibodies Against Antibody Therapeutics. Analysis on the Impact of U.S. FDA's Narrow Therapeutic Index Bioequivalence Criteria on Generic Drug Applications. Application of a Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Approach to Predict Tenofovir Pharmacokinetics During Pregnancy. Correction: Assessing Immunogenicity in Drug Reviews and Prescribing Information in Japan. Pharmaceutical Sciences: Insights and Observations from Academic Chairs and Vice Chairs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1