In Suspected Fetal Growth Restriction, sFlt-1/PlGF and PlGF May Have Value in Risk Stratification for Preterm Birth and Birthweight < 3rd Centile: A Blinded Cohort Study

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1111/ajo.70003
Ruth C. E. Hughes, Pippa Kyle, Ian Phillips, Chris M. Florkowski, Joanna Gullam
{"title":"In Suspected Fetal Growth Restriction, sFlt-1/PlGF and PlGF May Have Value in Risk Stratification for Preterm Birth and Birthweight < 3rd Centile: A Blinded Cohort Study","authors":"Ruth C. E. Hughes,&nbsp;Pippa Kyle,&nbsp;Ian Phillips,&nbsp;Chris M. Florkowski,&nbsp;Joanna Gullam","doi":"10.1111/ajo.70003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We investigated the value of measuring sFlt-1/PlGF in people with suspected fetal growth restriction (sFGR) without signs of preeclampsia at recruitment. Angiogenic biomarkers were considered positive when sFlt-1/PlGF &gt; 38 or PlGF &lt; 100 pg/mL. Clinicians were blinded to the sFlt-1/PlGF results. In sFGR presenting &lt; 32 weeks, but not ≥ 32–37 weeks, positive angiogenic biomarkers vs. NZ FGR criteria had increased risk of preterm birth RR 5.32 [2.04–13.88] vs. 2.19 [0.89–5.37], respectively, and birthweight &lt; 3rd centile RR 2.11 [1.24–3.58] vs. 1.83 [0.92–3.63], respectively. Larger studies are needed to establish whether routine testing of angiogenic biomarkers in sFGR is recommended for risk stratification.</p>","PeriodicalId":55429,"journal":{"name":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","volume":"65 5","pages":"703-708"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12723085/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajo.70003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigated the value of measuring sFlt-1/PlGF in people with suspected fetal growth restriction (sFGR) without signs of preeclampsia at recruitment. Angiogenic biomarkers were considered positive when sFlt-1/PlGF > 38 or PlGF < 100 pg/mL. Clinicians were blinded to the sFlt-1/PlGF results. In sFGR presenting < 32 weeks, but not ≥ 32–37 weeks, positive angiogenic biomarkers vs. NZ FGR criteria had increased risk of preterm birth RR 5.32 [2.04–13.88] vs. 2.19 [0.89–5.37], respectively, and birthweight < 3rd centile RR 2.11 [1.24–3.58] vs. 1.83 [0.92–3.63], respectively. Larger studies are needed to establish whether routine testing of angiogenic biomarkers in sFGR is recommended for risk stratification.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在疑似胎儿生长受限的情况下,sFlt-1/PlGF和PlGF可能在早产和出生体重< 3百分位的风险分层中有价值:一项盲法队列研究。
我们研究了在招募时没有先兆子痫迹象的疑似胎儿生长受限(sFGR)患者中测量sFlt-1/PlGF的价值。当sFlt-1/PlGF bbb38或PlGF时,血管生成生物标志物被认为是阳性的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
165
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (ANZJOG) is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG) and the RANZCOG Research foundation. ANZJOG aims to provide a medium for the publication of original contributions to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of obstetrics and gynaecology and related disciplines. Articles are peer reviewed by clinicians or researchers expert in the field of the submitted work. From time to time the journal will also publish printed abstracts from the RANZCOG Annual Scientific Meeting and meetings of relevant special interest groups, where the accepted abstracts have undergone the journals peer review acceptance process.
期刊最新文献
A New Era in Abortion Care in Western Australia—A Review of Women Accessing Abortion Care in a Tertiary Centre Following Legislative Change Research on Preterm Birth Prevention: The Participant Experience The Effect of COVID-19 During Pregnancy on Obstetric and Neonatal Outcomes: A Retrospective Case–Control Study Identifying Priority Outcomes for Mothers and Babies in Pregnancies With Preterm Pre-Labour Rupture of Membranes for Future Clinical Trials Comparing Sperm Selection Tools to Improve DNA Integrity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1