Specific and non-specific prognostic scores in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest caused by ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A comparative study

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1016/j.acvd.2024.12.011
Vincent Pham , Tahar Ghannam , Olivier Varenne , Alain Cariou , Florence Dumas , Donia Mafi , Fabien Picard
{"title":"Specific and non-specific prognostic scores in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest caused by ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A comparative study","authors":"Vincent Pham ,&nbsp;Tahar Ghannam ,&nbsp;Olivier Varenne ,&nbsp;Alain Cariou ,&nbsp;Florence Dumas ,&nbsp;Donia Mafi ,&nbsp;Fabien Picard","doi":"10.1016/j.acvd.2024.12.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients resuscitated after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) have a poor prognosis, with high death rates. Multiple scoring systems have been developed to predict survival in all-comers with OHCA. Acute coronary syndromes and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are the primary causes of OHCA. Recently, a specific prognostic score (Tran risk model) was developed for patients with STEMI-related OHCA.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To compare the accuracy of established non-STEMI-specific prognostic scores (OHCA, modified CAHP and NULL-PLEASE) with the Tran risk model in predicting in-hospital death among patients with STEMI-related OHCA.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was an observational single-centre study including 315 consecutive patients treated for STEMI-related OHCA. The OHCA score was calculated for 310 patients (98.4%), the NULL-PLEASE and modified CAHP (mCAHP) scores were calculated for 308 patients (97.8%) and the Tran risk model score was calculated for 306 patients (97.1%). A C-statistic analysis was performed to determine score performance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The area under the curve (AUC) for the Tran risk model was 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69–0.79). The AUCs for the OHCA, mCAHP and NULL-PLEASE scores were 0.74 (95% CI 0.69–0.80), 0.74 (95% CI 0.69–0.80) and 0.76 (95% CI 0.71–0.82), respectively. There was no significant difference in AUCs between the Tran risk model and the mCAHP score (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.95), the NULL-PLEASE score (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.42) or the OHCA score (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.93). Similarly, no significant difference was observed between the mCAHP, NULL-PLEASE and OHCA scores. Predictors of death were no-flow duration, diabetes, blood lactate, femoral access and age<!--> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->75 years.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The OHCA, NULL-PLEASE and mCAHP scores and the Tran risk model showed moderate to good performance in predicting in-hospital death in patients with STEMI-related OHCA. No differences in accuracy were found between non-STEMI-specific scores and the Tran risk model developed for patients with STEMI-related OHCA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55472,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases","volume":"118 3","pages":"Pages 161-169"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875213625000488","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Patients resuscitated after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) have a poor prognosis, with high death rates. Multiple scoring systems have been developed to predict survival in all-comers with OHCA. Acute coronary syndromes and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are the primary causes of OHCA. Recently, a specific prognostic score (Tran risk model) was developed for patients with STEMI-related OHCA.

Aim

To compare the accuracy of established non-STEMI-specific prognostic scores (OHCA, modified CAHP and NULL-PLEASE) with the Tran risk model in predicting in-hospital death among patients with STEMI-related OHCA.

Methods

This was an observational single-centre study including 315 consecutive patients treated for STEMI-related OHCA. The OHCA score was calculated for 310 patients (98.4%), the NULL-PLEASE and modified CAHP (mCAHP) scores were calculated for 308 patients (97.8%) and the Tran risk model score was calculated for 306 patients (97.1%). A C-statistic analysis was performed to determine score performance.

Results

The area under the curve (AUC) for the Tran risk model was 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69–0.79). The AUCs for the OHCA, mCAHP and NULL-PLEASE scores were 0.74 (95% CI 0.69–0.80), 0.74 (95% CI 0.69–0.80) and 0.76 (95% CI 0.71–0.82), respectively. There was no significant difference in AUCs between the Tran risk model and the mCAHP score (P = 0.95), the NULL-PLEASE score (P = 0.42) or the OHCA score (P = 0.93). Similarly, no significant difference was observed between the mCAHP, NULL-PLEASE and OHCA scores. Predictors of death were no-flow duration, diabetes, blood lactate, femoral access and age > 75 years.

Conclusions

The OHCA, NULL-PLEASE and mCAHP scores and the Tran risk model showed moderate to good performance in predicting in-hospital death in patients with STEMI-related OHCA. No differences in accuracy were found between non-STEMI-specific scores and the Tran risk model developed for patients with STEMI-related OHCA.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
st段抬高型心肌梗死引起院外心脏骤停患者特异性和非特异性预后评分的比较研究
背景:院外心脏骤停(OHCA)后复苏的患者预后差,死亡率高。已经开发了多种评分系统来预测所有OHCA患者的生存。急性冠状动脉综合征和st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)是OHCA的主要原因。最近,为stemi相关OHCA患者开发了一种特定的预后评分(Tran风险模型)。目的:比较已建立的非stemi特异性预后评分(OHCA、修正CAHP和NULL-PLEASE)与Tran风险模型预测stemi相关OHCA患者院内死亡的准确性。方法:这是一项观察性单中心研究,包括315例连续治疗stemi相关OHCA的患者。计算310例(98.4%)患者的OHCA评分,计算308例(97.8%)患者的NULL-PLEASE和改良CAHP (mCAHP)评分,计算306例(97.1%)患者的Tran风险模型评分。采用c统计分析来确定评分表现。结果:Tran风险模型的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.75(95%置信区间[CI] 0.69-0.79)。OHCA、mCAHP和NULL-PLEASE评分的auc分别为0.74 (95% CI 0.69-0.80)、0.74 (95% CI 0.69-0.80)和0.76 (95% CI 0.71-0.82)。Tran风险模型与mCAHP评分(P=0.95)、NULL-PLEASE评分(P=0.42)或OHCA评分(P=0.93)的auc无显著差异。同样,mCAHP、NULL-PLEASE和OHCA评分之间也没有显著差异。死亡预测因子为无血流持续时间、糖尿病、血乳酸、股动脉通路和年龄0 ~ 75岁。结论:OHCA、NULL-PLEASE和mCAHP评分以及Tran风险模型在预测stemi相关OHCA患者的院内死亡方面表现出中等到较好的效果。非stemi特异性评分与为stemi相关OHCA患者开发的Tran风险模型在准确性上没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases
Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
87
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes original peer-reviewed clinical and research articles, epidemiological studies, new methodological clinical approaches, review articles and editorials. Topics covered include coronary artery and valve diseases, interventional and pediatric cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, cardiomyopathy and heart failure, arrhythmias and stimulation, cardiovascular imaging, vascular medicine and hypertension, epidemiology and risk factors, and large multicenter studies. Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases also publishes abstracts of papers presented at the annual sessions of the Journées Européennes de la Société Française de Cardiologie and the guidelines edited by the French Society of Cardiology.
期刊最新文献
Experts' recommendations for the management of adult patients with cardiogenic shock. Comparing the use of coronary revascularization in France and the United States: Divergent trends. Electrocardiographic phenotypes of a representative subset of the French general population: ECGs at inclusion in the CONSTANCES cohort. Contents Editorial board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1