Exploring the Challenges Student Pharmacists Confront when Learning to Detect Medication-Related Problems in Electronic Health Records: Implications for Instructional Design.

IF 3.8 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101371
Russ H Palmer, Daniel Chastain, Christopher M Bland, Beth B Phillips
{"title":"Exploring the Challenges Student Pharmacists Confront when Learning to Detect Medication-Related Problems in Electronic Health Records: Implications for Instructional Design.","authors":"Russ H Palmer, Daniel Chastain, Christopher M Bland, Beth B Phillips","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to explore the challenges pharmacy students face when learning to detect medication-related problems (MRPs) in electronic health records (EHRs) during simulated patient work-ups and offer implications for instructional design in pharmacy education METHODS: A qualitative research design was employed to analyze responses from 120 third-year pharmacy students enrolled in a required course. The students completed open-ended surveys at the end of the semester, describing the difficulties they encountered while working on patient cases in a simulated EHR. Inductive thematic analysis was used to identify recurring themes related to the students' challenges.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis revealed three macro-categories of challenges: (1) Work-up Process, including rushing through tasks and overlooking information; (2) Interpreting Cues, such as failing to understand the relevance of data and information overload; and (3) Perceived Ambiguity, including difficulty defining MRPs and conflicting information in the EHR. A total of ten specific themes were discovered within these macro-categories, providing a comprehensive view of the challenges students confronted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Learners experienced significant challenges in detecting MRPs. These challenges were primarily rooted in managing the work-up process, interpreting clinical cues, and handling ambiguous information. The findings suggest a need for more structured scaffolding, repeated case-based practice focused on key cues, and new strategies for modeling how to address ambiguity in clinical settings. These modifications may enhance students' clinical reasoning and problem-detection abilities, improving their preparedness for real-world pharmacy practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":" ","pages":"101371"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101371","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to explore the challenges pharmacy students face when learning to detect medication-related problems (MRPs) in electronic health records (EHRs) during simulated patient work-ups and offer implications for instructional design in pharmacy education METHODS: A qualitative research design was employed to analyze responses from 120 third-year pharmacy students enrolled in a required course. The students completed open-ended surveys at the end of the semester, describing the difficulties they encountered while working on patient cases in a simulated EHR. Inductive thematic analysis was used to identify recurring themes related to the students' challenges.

Results: The analysis revealed three macro-categories of challenges: (1) Work-up Process, including rushing through tasks and overlooking information; (2) Interpreting Cues, such as failing to understand the relevance of data and information overload; and (3) Perceived Ambiguity, including difficulty defining MRPs and conflicting information in the EHR. A total of ten specific themes were discovered within these macro-categories, providing a comprehensive view of the challenges students confronted.

Conclusion: Learners experienced significant challenges in detecting MRPs. These challenges were primarily rooted in managing the work-up process, interpreting clinical cues, and handling ambiguous information. The findings suggest a need for more structured scaffolding, repeated case-based practice focused on key cues, and new strategies for modeling how to address ambiguity in clinical settings. These modifications may enhance students' clinical reasoning and problem-detection abilities, improving their preparedness for real-world pharmacy practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors. After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.
期刊最新文献
A Scoping Review of Planetary Health Education in Pharmacy Curricula. Comparing Analytic and Mixed-Approach Rubrics for Academic Poster Quality. Threshold concepts as a framework for understanding the internal work in professional identity formation. Exploring the Challenges Student Pharmacists Confront when Learning to Detect Medication-Related Problems in Electronic Health Records: Implications for Instructional Design. Fixed, Systematically Formed versus Continuously Changing Random Team Assignments and Outcomes in a Therapeutics Course.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1