Exploring the Challenges Student Pharmacists Confront when Learning to Detect Medication-Related Problems in Electronic Health Records: Implications for Instructional Design.
Russ H Palmer, Daniel Chastain, Christopher M Bland, Beth B Phillips
{"title":"Exploring the Challenges Student Pharmacists Confront when Learning to Detect Medication-Related Problems in Electronic Health Records: Implications for Instructional Design.","authors":"Russ H Palmer, Daniel Chastain, Christopher M Bland, Beth B Phillips","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to explore the challenges pharmacy students face when learning to detect medication-related problems (MRPs) in electronic health records (EHRs) during simulated patient work-ups and offer implications for instructional design in pharmacy education METHODS: A qualitative research design was employed to analyze responses from 120 third-year pharmacy students enrolled in a required course. The students completed open-ended surveys at the end of the semester, describing the difficulties they encountered while working on patient cases in a simulated EHR. Inductive thematic analysis was used to identify recurring themes related to the students' challenges.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis revealed three macro-categories of challenges: (1) Work-up Process, including rushing through tasks and overlooking information; (2) Interpreting Cues, such as failing to understand the relevance of data and information overload; and (3) Perceived Ambiguity, including difficulty defining MRPs and conflicting information in the EHR. A total of ten specific themes were discovered within these macro-categories, providing a comprehensive view of the challenges students confronted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Learners experienced significant challenges in detecting MRPs. These challenges were primarily rooted in managing the work-up process, interpreting clinical cues, and handling ambiguous information. The findings suggest a need for more structured scaffolding, repeated case-based practice focused on key cues, and new strategies for modeling how to address ambiguity in clinical settings. These modifications may enhance students' clinical reasoning and problem-detection abilities, improving their preparedness for real-world pharmacy practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":" ","pages":"101371"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101371","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to explore the challenges pharmacy students face when learning to detect medication-related problems (MRPs) in electronic health records (EHRs) during simulated patient work-ups and offer implications for instructional design in pharmacy education METHODS: A qualitative research design was employed to analyze responses from 120 third-year pharmacy students enrolled in a required course. The students completed open-ended surveys at the end of the semester, describing the difficulties they encountered while working on patient cases in a simulated EHR. Inductive thematic analysis was used to identify recurring themes related to the students' challenges.
Results: The analysis revealed three macro-categories of challenges: (1) Work-up Process, including rushing through tasks and overlooking information; (2) Interpreting Cues, such as failing to understand the relevance of data and information overload; and (3) Perceived Ambiguity, including difficulty defining MRPs and conflicting information in the EHR. A total of ten specific themes were discovered within these macro-categories, providing a comprehensive view of the challenges students confronted.
Conclusion: Learners experienced significant challenges in detecting MRPs. These challenges were primarily rooted in managing the work-up process, interpreting clinical cues, and handling ambiguous information. The findings suggest a need for more structured scaffolding, repeated case-based practice focused on key cues, and new strategies for modeling how to address ambiguity in clinical settings. These modifications may enhance students' clinical reasoning and problem-detection abilities, improving their preparedness for real-world pharmacy practice.
期刊介绍:
The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors.
After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.