Predicting individual long-term prognosis of spatial neglect based on acute stroke patient data.

IF 4.5 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Brain communications Pub Date : 2025-01-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/braincomms/fcaf047
Lisa Röhrig, Daniel Wiesen, Dongyun Li, Christopher Rorden, Hans-Otto Karnath
{"title":"Predicting individual long-term prognosis of spatial neglect based on acute stroke patient data.","authors":"Lisa Röhrig, Daniel Wiesen, Dongyun Li, Christopher Rorden, Hans-Otto Karnath","doi":"10.1093/braincomms/fcaf047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>One of the most pressing questions after a stroke is whether an individual patient will recover in the long term. Previous studies demonstrated that spatial neglect-a common cognitive deficit after right hemispheric stroke-is a strong predictor for poor performance on a wide range of everyday tasks and for resistance to rehabilitation. The possibility of predicting long-term prognosis of spatial neglect is therefore of great relevance. The aim of the present study was to test the prognostic value of different imaging and non-imaging features from right hemispheric stroke patients: individual demographics (age, sex), initial neglect severity and acute lesion information (size, location). Patients' behaviour was tested twice in the acute and the chronic phases of stroke and prediction models were built using machine learning-based algorithms with repeated nested cross-validation and feature selection. Model performances indicate that demographic information seemed less beneficial. The best variable combination comprised individual neglect severity in the acute phase of stroke, together with lesion location and size. The latter were based on individual lesion overlaps with a previously proposed chronic neglect region of interest that covers anterior parts of the superior and middle temporal gyri and the basal ganglia. These variables achieved a remarkably high level of accuracy by explaining 66% of the total variance of neglect patients, making them promising features in the prediction of individual outcome prognosis. An online tool is provided with which our algorithm can be used for individual outcome predictions (https://niivue.github.io/niivue-neglect/).</p>","PeriodicalId":93915,"journal":{"name":"Brain communications","volume":"7 1","pages":"fcaf047"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11814933/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcaf047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the most pressing questions after a stroke is whether an individual patient will recover in the long term. Previous studies demonstrated that spatial neglect-a common cognitive deficit after right hemispheric stroke-is a strong predictor for poor performance on a wide range of everyday tasks and for resistance to rehabilitation. The possibility of predicting long-term prognosis of spatial neglect is therefore of great relevance. The aim of the present study was to test the prognostic value of different imaging and non-imaging features from right hemispheric stroke patients: individual demographics (age, sex), initial neglect severity and acute lesion information (size, location). Patients' behaviour was tested twice in the acute and the chronic phases of stroke and prediction models were built using machine learning-based algorithms with repeated nested cross-validation and feature selection. Model performances indicate that demographic information seemed less beneficial. The best variable combination comprised individual neglect severity in the acute phase of stroke, together with lesion location and size. The latter were based on individual lesion overlaps with a previously proposed chronic neglect region of interest that covers anterior parts of the superior and middle temporal gyri and the basal ganglia. These variables achieved a remarkably high level of accuracy by explaining 66% of the total variance of neglect patients, making them promising features in the prediction of individual outcome prognosis. An online tool is provided with which our algorithm can be used for individual outcome predictions (https://niivue.github.io/niivue-neglect/).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于急性脑卒中患者数据预测空间忽视的个体长期预后。
中风后最紧迫的问题之一是病人能否长期康复。先前的研究表明,空间忽视——右半球中风后常见的认知缺陷——是一个强有力的预测因素,预示着患者在广泛的日常任务中表现不佳,以及对康复有抵抗力。因此,预测空间忽视的长期预后的可能性具有重要意义。本研究的目的是测试右半脑卒中患者不同影像学和非影像学特征的预后价值:个体人口统计学(年龄、性别)、初始忽视严重程度和急性病变信息(大小、位置)。在急性期和慢性期对患者的行为进行了两次测试,并使用基于机器学习的算法建立了预测模型,该算法具有重复嵌套交叉验证和特征选择。模型性能表明,人口统计信息似乎不太有用。最佳变量组合包括脑卒中急性期个体忽视严重程度、病变部位和大小。后者是基于个体病变与先前提出的慢性忽视感兴趣区域重叠,该区域覆盖颞上回和中颞回的前部以及基底神经节。这些变量通过解释被忽视患者总方差的66%,达到了非常高的准确性,使它们成为预测个体结局预后的有希望的特征。提供了一个在线工具,我们的算法可以用于个人结果预测(https://niivue.github.io/niivue-neglect/)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Tau-PET imaging and blood biomarkers reveal early tauopathy in special operations forces exposed to repetitive blast. Linking movement-related beta oscillations to cortical excitability, structural damage, and fatigue in multiple sclerosis. Motor neuron disease can present as a paraneoplastic neurologic syndrome with various phenotypes. Examining neuroimaging biomarkers, plasma biomarkers and cognitive functions in patients with recovered COVID-19 infection: a multicentre study using 7T MRI. Ventricular enlargement is associated with early Alzheimer's disease pathophysiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1