Tracking Cognitive Trajectories in Mild Cognitive Impairment Using a Machine Learning Technique of Subtype and Stage Inference.

Dementia and neurocognitive disorders Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-07 DOI:10.12779/dnd.2025.24.1.44
Hui Jin Ryu, Kyoung Ja Kwon, Yeonsil Moon
{"title":"Tracking Cognitive Trajectories in Mild Cognitive Impairment Using a Machine Learning Technique of Subtype and Stage Inference.","authors":"Hui Jin Ryu, Kyoung Ja Kwon, Yeonsil Moon","doi":"10.12779/dnd.2025.24.1.44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Recognizing cognitive decline patterns in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is crucial for early screening and preventive interventions. However, studies on the trajectory of individual cognitive functions in MCI are limited. Thus, the purpose of this study was to identify subtypes and stages of cognitive decline in MCI using a machine learning method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 944 subjects consisting of those who were cognitively normal and those with MCI were enrolled. Fifteen neuropsychological tasks were used in the analysis. The optimal number of subtypes was determined based on the cross-validation information criterion. Fifteen stages of cognitive trajectory were estimated for each subtype.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The following three subtypes were identified: amnestic-verbal subtype, dysexecutive subtype, and amnestic-visual subtype. Of 723 (76.6%) subjects who had reached stage 1 at least, amnestic-verbal subtype accounted for the most (n=340, 47.0%), followed by dysexecutive subtype (n=253, 35.0%) and amnestic-visual subtype (n=130, 18%). The amnestic-verbal subtype had significantly more males (amnestic-verbal: 41.8%, dysexecutive: 31.2%, and amnestic-visual: 28.5%), younger subjects (amnestic-verbal: 72.01 years, dysexecutive: 74.43 years, and amnestic-visual: 75.06 years), higher educational years (amnestic-verbal: 11.06 years, dysexecutive: 9.53 years, and amnestic-visual: 9.79 years), lower Clinical Dementia Rating sum of boxes (amnestic-verbal: 1.40, dysexecutive: 1.61, and amnestic-visual: 1.71), and lower Korean-Instrumental Activities of Daily Living score (amnestic-verbal: 0.20, dysexecutive: 0.27, and amnestic-visual: 0.26).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Three types of MCIs were extracted using SuStaIn. Pathways of MCI deterioration could be different. The amnestic type could be bisected based on whether episodic verbal or visual memory is degraded first.</p>","PeriodicalId":72779,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and neurocognitive disorders","volume":"24 1","pages":"44-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11813553/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia and neurocognitive disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12779/dnd.2025.24.1.44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Recognizing cognitive decline patterns in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is crucial for early screening and preventive interventions. However, studies on the trajectory of individual cognitive functions in MCI are limited. Thus, the purpose of this study was to identify subtypes and stages of cognitive decline in MCI using a machine learning method.

Methods: A total of 944 subjects consisting of those who were cognitively normal and those with MCI were enrolled. Fifteen neuropsychological tasks were used in the analysis. The optimal number of subtypes was determined based on the cross-validation information criterion. Fifteen stages of cognitive trajectory were estimated for each subtype.

Results: The following three subtypes were identified: amnestic-verbal subtype, dysexecutive subtype, and amnestic-visual subtype. Of 723 (76.6%) subjects who had reached stage 1 at least, amnestic-verbal subtype accounted for the most (n=340, 47.0%), followed by dysexecutive subtype (n=253, 35.0%) and amnestic-visual subtype (n=130, 18%). The amnestic-verbal subtype had significantly more males (amnestic-verbal: 41.8%, dysexecutive: 31.2%, and amnestic-visual: 28.5%), younger subjects (amnestic-verbal: 72.01 years, dysexecutive: 74.43 years, and amnestic-visual: 75.06 years), higher educational years (amnestic-verbal: 11.06 years, dysexecutive: 9.53 years, and amnestic-visual: 9.79 years), lower Clinical Dementia Rating sum of boxes (amnestic-verbal: 1.40, dysexecutive: 1.61, and amnestic-visual: 1.71), and lower Korean-Instrumental Activities of Daily Living score (amnestic-verbal: 0.20, dysexecutive: 0.27, and amnestic-visual: 0.26).

Conclusions: Three types of MCIs were extracted using SuStaIn. Pathways of MCI deterioration could be different. The amnestic type could be bisected based on whether episodic verbal or visual memory is degraded first.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Case of Combined Corticobasal Degeneration and Alzheimer's Disease Pathology: Clinical Presentation, and Diagnosis. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Dementia: Recommendations for Cholinesterase Inhibitors and Memantine. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Dementia: Recommendations for the Pharmacological Treatment of Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms. Effects of Cognitive and Depressive Status on Empathy in Healthy Elderly, Amnestic MCI, and Dementia of the Alzheimer's Type. Tracking Cognitive Trajectories in Mild Cognitive Impairment Using a Machine Learning Technique of Subtype and Stage Inference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1