Barriers and facilitators to caring for patients living with dementia in the emergency department: a qualitative study.

IF 2.4 CJEM Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1007/s43678-025-00862-0
Dana Jelinski, Krista Reich, Eddy Lang, Jayna Holroyd-Leduc, Zahra Goodarzi
{"title":"Barriers and facilitators to caring for patients living with dementia in the emergency department: a qualitative study.","authors":"Dana Jelinski, Krista Reich, Eddy Lang, Jayna Holroyd-Leduc, Zahra Goodarzi","doi":"10.1007/s43678-025-00862-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patients living with dementia are complex and visit the emergency department (ED) more frequently than other populations. There is a knowledge gap regarding challenges in care delivery for these patients from the perspective of interdisciplinary healthcare providers. The aim of this study was to identify the barriers and facilitators to caring for people living with dementia in the ED as perceived by healthcare providers to gain a deeper understanding of current care gaps and inform best care practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with healthcare providers to understand their experiences in caring for people living with dementia in the ED. Healthcare providers currently employed within in a Calgary zone ED and with experience in caring for people living with dementia in the ED were eligible for participation. The Framework Method based on the Theoretical Domains Framework and the Behavior Change Wheel was used in the analysis to inform change interventions by addressing key factors that influence behavior.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11 providers participated. Key facilitators to care included collaborative team approaches; collateral information from care partners, EMS, and care homes; geriatric medicine staff; addressing non-medical needs; and person-centered care. Key barriers to care included the ED environment encompassing challenges with lack of resources, staff, and time constraints; deteriorating cognition and behavioral challenges; and a lack of dementia-specific guidance and training.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights key issues in emergency care delivery at the system, unit, provider, and patient levels for people living with dementia through the analysis of healthcare provider experiences. Environmental context and resources, skills, and social/professional role and identity were key domains correlating to the major barriers and facilitators in these findings. Key opportunities for change are identified through which targeted interventions and policies may address dementia-related care gaps within the ED context.</p>","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJEM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-025-00862-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Patients living with dementia are complex and visit the emergency department (ED) more frequently than other populations. There is a knowledge gap regarding challenges in care delivery for these patients from the perspective of interdisciplinary healthcare providers. The aim of this study was to identify the barriers and facilitators to caring for people living with dementia in the ED as perceived by healthcare providers to gain a deeper understanding of current care gaps and inform best care practices.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with healthcare providers to understand their experiences in caring for people living with dementia in the ED. Healthcare providers currently employed within in a Calgary zone ED and with experience in caring for people living with dementia in the ED were eligible for participation. The Framework Method based on the Theoretical Domains Framework and the Behavior Change Wheel was used in the analysis to inform change interventions by addressing key factors that influence behavior.

Results: A total of 11 providers participated. Key facilitators to care included collaborative team approaches; collateral information from care partners, EMS, and care homes; geriatric medicine staff; addressing non-medical needs; and person-centered care. Key barriers to care included the ED environment encompassing challenges with lack of resources, staff, and time constraints; deteriorating cognition and behavioral challenges; and a lack of dementia-specific guidance and training.

Conclusion: This study highlights key issues in emergency care delivery at the system, unit, provider, and patient levels for people living with dementia through the analysis of healthcare provider experiences. Environmental context and resources, skills, and social/professional role and identity were key domains correlating to the major barriers and facilitators in these findings. Key opportunities for change are identified through which targeted interventions and policies may address dementia-related care gaps within the ED context.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Keeping the door open: virtual coverage of rural emergency departments-what works and what doesn't. Physician perspectives on providing virtual emergency department care for equity-deserving populations. Thousands of critical interruptions. Dr. Jill McEwen-in memoriam : July 20, 1957-November 1, 2024. Healthcare leadership in the specialty of prehospital and transport medicine: inspiring excellence and innovation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1