Adverse maternal outcomes after vaginal versus caesarean delivery in women with Crohn's disease and prior perianal surgery: a population-based study.

Xiaocen Zhang, Bente Mertz Nørgård, Olav Sivertsen Garvik, Jan Nielsen, Mette Louise Andersen, Sonia Friedman
{"title":"Adverse maternal outcomes after vaginal versus caesarean delivery in women with Crohn's disease and prior perianal surgery: a population-based study.","authors":"Xiaocen Zhang, Bente Mertz Nørgård, Olav Sivertsen Garvik, Jan Nielsen, Mette Louise Andersen, Sonia Friedman","doi":"10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaf028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>For pregnant women with perianal Crohn's disease (CD), major guidelines recommend delivery by caesarean section (c-section) for active disease, and that delivery mode be governed by obstetric indications for women with inactive disease. However, a significant gray zone exists between active versus inactive disease, such as for women who had a history of prior perianal surgery. We examined adverse maternal outcomes of vaginal delivery versus c-section in women with perianal CD and prior perianal surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the Danish national registries to collect information on singleton live births from 1997 through 2022 by mothers with CD and previous perianal surgery. Adverse postpartum maternal outcomes included new perianal or intestinal surgery within 12 months, hospital diagnosed infection or outpatient antibiotic prescription within 6 months, and major haemorrhage within 3 days. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were estimated in logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 704 deliveries by women with CD and prior perianal surgery, including 245 vaginal deliveries (34.8%) and 459 c-sections (65.2%). Women who delivered vaginally versus by c-section had less new perianal surgery (aOR 0.47, 95% CI, 0.24-0.93) and no significant differences in intestinal CD surgery (aOR 0.87, 95% CI, 0.43-1.75), hospital diagnosed infection (aOR 0.50, 95% CI, 0.18-1.38), outpatient antibiotic prescription (aOR 0.92, 95% CI, 0.65-1.28), or major hemorrhage (aOR 0.79, 95% CI, 0.39-1.59).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Vaginal delivery was not associated with increased important adverse maternal outcomes in mothers with CD and prior perianal surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":94074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Crohn's & colitis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Crohn's & colitis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaf028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: For pregnant women with perianal Crohn's disease (CD), major guidelines recommend delivery by caesarean section (c-section) for active disease, and that delivery mode be governed by obstetric indications for women with inactive disease. However, a significant gray zone exists between active versus inactive disease, such as for women who had a history of prior perianal surgery. We examined adverse maternal outcomes of vaginal delivery versus c-section in women with perianal CD and prior perianal surgeries.

Methods: We used the Danish national registries to collect information on singleton live births from 1997 through 2022 by mothers with CD and previous perianal surgery. Adverse postpartum maternal outcomes included new perianal or intestinal surgery within 12 months, hospital diagnosed infection or outpatient antibiotic prescription within 6 months, and major haemorrhage within 3 days. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were estimated in logistic regression models.

Results: There were 704 deliveries by women with CD and prior perianal surgery, including 245 vaginal deliveries (34.8%) and 459 c-sections (65.2%). Women who delivered vaginally versus by c-section had less new perianal surgery (aOR 0.47, 95% CI, 0.24-0.93) and no significant differences in intestinal CD surgery (aOR 0.87, 95% CI, 0.43-1.75), hospital diagnosed infection (aOR 0.50, 95% CI, 0.18-1.38), outpatient antibiotic prescription (aOR 0.92, 95% CI, 0.65-1.28), or major hemorrhage (aOR 0.79, 95% CI, 0.39-1.59).

Conclusions: Vaginal delivery was not associated with increased important adverse maternal outcomes in mothers with CD and prior perianal surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患有克罗恩病且既往肛周手术的妇女阴道分娩与剖宫产后的不良产妇结局:一项基于人群的研究
背景和目的:对于患有肛周克罗恩病(CD)的孕妇,主要指南建议活动性疾病患者采用剖腹产(c-section)分娩,而非活动性疾病患者的分娩方式应由产科指征决定。然而,活动性疾病与非活动性疾病之间存在显著的灰色地带,例如有肛周手术史的女性。我们研究了阴道分娩与剖腹产对肛周CD患者和既往肛周手术患者的不良结局。方法:我们使用丹麦国家登记处收集1997年至2022年患有乳糜泻和既往肛周手术的母亲的单胎活产信息。产后产妇不良结局包括12个月内新的肛周或肠道手术,6个月内医院诊断感染或门诊抗生素处方,3天内大出血。在逻辑回归模型中估计校正优势比(aOR)。结果:有过肛周手术的CD患者共分娩704例,其中阴道分娩245例(34.8%),剖腹产459例(65.2%)。阴道分娩与剖腹产相比,新肛周手术较少(aOR 0.47, 95% CI 0.24-0.93),肠CD手术(aOR 0.87, 95% CI 0.43-1.75)、医院诊断感染(aOR 0.50, 95% CI 0.18-1.38)、门诊抗生素处方(aOR 0.92, 95% CI 0.65-1.28)或大出血(aOR 0.79, 95% CI 0.39-1.59)方面无显著差异。结论:阴道分娩与患有乳糜泻和既往肛周手术的母亲的重要不良结局增加无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tunnel vision: rethinking local therapy for perianal fistulas in Crohn's disease. IOlBD evidence-based consensus on the use of artificial intelligence for assessment of endoscopic and histologic endpoints in clinical trials of inflammatory bowel disease. Patient knowledge and awareness on inflammatory bowel disease as it evolves as a global disease: a scoping review. Prior anti-tumor necrosis factor exposure and colectomy risk in acute severe ulcerative colitis: time-to-event and target-trial considerations in MOREUS (GETECCU). Anxiety and depression in newly diagnosed patients with inflammatory bowel disease (the IBSEN III study) compared with the general population in Norway.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1