Digital PCR quantification of hematopoietic chimerism by insertion/deletion: A personalized selection for different chimerism status.

Dai-Yang Li, Pei-Li Xiao, Ye-Mo Li, Lin An, Ning-Juan Wang, Zhi-Yang Yuan, Ke-Ming Du, Zhong-Zheng Zheng
{"title":"Digital PCR quantification of hematopoietic chimerism by insertion/deletion: A personalized selection for different chimerism status.","authors":"Dai-Yang Li, Pei-Li Xiao, Ye-Mo Li, Lin An, Ning-Juan Wang, Zhi-Yang Yuan, Ke-Ming Du, Zhong-Zheng Zheng","doi":"10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical decision-making after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is partially based on hematopoietic chimerism analysis. Short tandem repeat (STR), the current gold standard for quantitative chimerism analysis, has limited sensitivity. Digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) combines precise quantification and high reproducibility with excellent sensitivity (usually ≤ 0.1%) in a wide measurement range. However, the reported dPCR-based chimerism detection methods were developed in non-Chinese cohorts and may not be applicable in a Chinese population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To achieve higher sensitivity and accuracy, we first screened out 14 insertions/deletions (indel) loci with high individual recognition rates in Asian populations based on the literature and NCBI. Then, we established a dPCR detection system for routine chimerism assessment (\"dPCR-chimerism system\") in the Chinese transplant population. We compared the consistencies between STR and dPCR in patient samples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The newly established dPCR-chimerism system has a high coverage (12 pairs of autosomes), a sensitivity of 0.01%, and an excellent linearity of 0.016%-50%. For dual-donor samples, there was a strong correlation between STR and dPCR chimerism detection values (R2 = 0.9974). The R2 of the dPCR results was higher than STR when the theoretical chimerism rate of the single recipient was ≤ 5%. Clinical verification in 44 HSCT patients suggested a close correlation between STR and dPCR on most occasions, (mean difference, 0.68%) and differences between the two techniques in some cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our new system has great repeatability and sensitivity, especially in detecting micro-chimerism and in dual donor samples. It is expected to show good applicability in Chinese transplant patients. Selecting dPCR/STR testing according to each individual's chimerism status facilitates sensitive and accurate analysis, effective early treatment interventions, and relapse monitoring in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":94115,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical decision-making after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is partially based on hematopoietic chimerism analysis. Short tandem repeat (STR), the current gold standard for quantitative chimerism analysis, has limited sensitivity. Digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) combines precise quantification and high reproducibility with excellent sensitivity (usually ≤ 0.1%) in a wide measurement range. However, the reported dPCR-based chimerism detection methods were developed in non-Chinese cohorts and may not be applicable in a Chinese population.

Methods: To achieve higher sensitivity and accuracy, we first screened out 14 insertions/deletions (indel) loci with high individual recognition rates in Asian populations based on the literature and NCBI. Then, we established a dPCR detection system for routine chimerism assessment ("dPCR-chimerism system") in the Chinese transplant population. We compared the consistencies between STR and dPCR in patient samples.

Results: The newly established dPCR-chimerism system has a high coverage (12 pairs of autosomes), a sensitivity of 0.01%, and an excellent linearity of 0.016%-50%. For dual-donor samples, there was a strong correlation between STR and dPCR chimerism detection values (R2 = 0.9974). The R2 of the dPCR results was higher than STR when the theoretical chimerism rate of the single recipient was ≤ 5%. Clinical verification in 44 HSCT patients suggested a close correlation between STR and dPCR on most occasions, (mean difference, 0.68%) and differences between the two techniques in some cases.

Conclusion: Our new system has great repeatability and sensitivity, especially in detecting micro-chimerism and in dual donor samples. It is expected to show good applicability in Chinese transplant patients. Selecting dPCR/STR testing according to each individual's chimerism status facilitates sensitive and accurate analysis, effective early treatment interventions, and relapse monitoring in clinical settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Air pollution causes abnormal alanine aminotransferase levels in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Digital PCR quantification of hematopoietic chimerism by insertion/deletion: A personalized selection for different chimerism status. Multimodal analgesia with thoracic paravertebral block decrease pain and side effects in mastectomy patients. Three decades of pediatric intoxication trends in Taiwan: A retrospective cohort analysis (1985-2020). Work-related factors of low back pain among Indonesian manufacturing workers in Taiwan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1