A deep-learning model for predicting tyrosine kinase inhibitor response from histology in gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY The Journal of Pathology Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1002/path.6399
Xue Kong, Jun Shi, Dongdong Sun, Lanqing Cheng, Can Wu, Zhiguo Jiang, Yushan Zheng, Wei Wang, Haibo Wu
{"title":"A deep-learning model for predicting tyrosine kinase inhibitor response from histology in gastrointestinal stromal tumor.","authors":"Xue Kong, Jun Shi, Dongdong Sun, Lanqing Cheng, Can Wu, Zhiguo Jiang, Yushan Zheng, Wei Wang, Haibo Wu","doi":"10.1002/path.6399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over 90% of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) harbor mutations in KIT or PDGFRA that can predict response to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapies, as recommended by NCCN (National Comprehensive Cancer Network) guidelines. However, gene sequencing for mutation testing is expensive and time-consuming and is susceptible to a variety of preanalytical factors. To overcome the challenges associated with genetic screening by sequencing, in the current study we developed an artificial intelligence-based deep-learning (DL) model that uses convolutional neural networks (CNN) to analyze digitized hematoxylin and eosin staining in tumor histological sections to predict potential response to imatinib or avapritinib treatment in GIST patients. Assessment with an independent testing set showed that our DL  model could predict imatinib sensitivity with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.902 in case-wise analysis and 0.807 in slide-wise analysis. Case-level AUCs for predicting imatinib-dose-adjustment cases, avapritinib-sensitive cases, and wildtype GISTs were 0.920, 0.958, and 0.776, respectively, while slide-level AUCs for these respective groups were 0.714, 0.922, and 0.886, respectively. Our model showed comparable or better prediction of actual response to TKI than sequencing-based screening (accuracy 0.9286 versus 0.8929; DL model versus sequencing), while predictions of nonresponse to imatinib/avapritinib showed markedly higher accuracy than sequencing (0.7143 versus 0.4286). These results demonstrate the potential of a DL model to improve predictions of treatment response to TKI therapy from histology in GIST patients. © 2025 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.</p>","PeriodicalId":232,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Pathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/path.6399","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over 90% of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) harbor mutations in KIT or PDGFRA that can predict response to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapies, as recommended by NCCN (National Comprehensive Cancer Network) guidelines. However, gene sequencing for mutation testing is expensive and time-consuming and is susceptible to a variety of preanalytical factors. To overcome the challenges associated with genetic screening by sequencing, in the current study we developed an artificial intelligence-based deep-learning (DL) model that uses convolutional neural networks (CNN) to analyze digitized hematoxylin and eosin staining in tumor histological sections to predict potential response to imatinib or avapritinib treatment in GIST patients. Assessment with an independent testing set showed that our DL  model could predict imatinib sensitivity with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.902 in case-wise analysis and 0.807 in slide-wise analysis. Case-level AUCs for predicting imatinib-dose-adjustment cases, avapritinib-sensitive cases, and wildtype GISTs were 0.920, 0.958, and 0.776, respectively, while slide-level AUCs for these respective groups were 0.714, 0.922, and 0.886, respectively. Our model showed comparable or better prediction of actual response to TKI than sequencing-based screening (accuracy 0.9286 versus 0.8929; DL model versus sequencing), while predictions of nonresponse to imatinib/avapritinib showed markedly higher accuracy than sequencing (0.7143 versus 0.4286). These results demonstrate the potential of a DL model to improve predictions of treatment response to TKI therapy from histology in GIST patients. © 2025 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据美国国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)指南的建议,90%以上的胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)都存在KIT或PDGFRA突变,可以预测对酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)疗法的反应。然而,用于突变检测的基因测序既昂贵又耗时,而且容易受到各种分析前因素的影响。为了克服基因测序筛查所面临的挑战,我们在本研究中开发了一种基于人工智能的深度学习(DL)该模型使用卷积神经网络(CNN)分析肿瘤组织学切片中数字化苏木精和伊红染色,以预测GIST患者对伊马替尼或阿伐替尼治疗的潜在反应。独立测试集的评估结果表明,我们的 DL 模型可以预测伊马替尼的敏感性,病例分析的曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.902,滑动分析的曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.807。预测伊马替尼剂量调整病例、阿伐替尼敏感病例和野生型GIST的病例水平AUC分别为0.920、0.958和0.776,而这些组别的滑动水平AUC分别为0.714、0.922和0.886。与基于测序的筛查相比,我们的模型对 TKI 实际应答的预测效果相当或更好(准确率为 0.9286 对 0.8929;DL 模型对测序),而对伊马替尼/阿伐替尼无应答的预测准确率明显高于测序(0.7143 对 0.4286)。这些结果表明,DL 模型有可能改善根据组织学预测 GIST 患者对 TKI 治疗的反应。© 2025 大不列颠及爱尔兰病理学会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The Journal of Pathology
The Journal of Pathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
1.40%
发文量
144
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pathology aims to serve as a translational bridge between basic biomedical science and clinical medicine with particular emphasis on, but not restricted to, tissue based studies. The main interests of the Journal lie in publishing studies that further our understanding the pathophysiological and pathogenetic mechanisms of human disease. The Journal of Pathology welcomes investigative studies on human tissues, in vitro and in vivo experimental studies, and investigations based on animal models with a clear relevance to human disease, including transgenic systems. As well as original research papers, the Journal seeks to provide rapid publication in a variety of other formats, including editorials, review articles, commentaries and perspectives and other features, both contributed and solicited.
期刊最新文献
A deep-learning model for predicting tyrosine kinase inhibitor response from histology in gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Redefining phenotypic intratumor heterogeneity of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a bottom-up approach. Comprehensive characterization of micropapillary colorectal adenocarcinoma. Clonal dynamics of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia progression: paired-sample comparison. Unveiling the intriguing relationship: oncogenic KRAS, morphological shifts, and mutational complexity in pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1