Associations among body condition score, body weight, and serum biochemistry in dairy cows.

IF 3.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Journal of Dairy Science Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.3168/jds.2024-25425
David B Sheedy, Helen M Golder, Sergio C Garcia, Priyanka Reddy, Joanne E Hemsworth, Delphine E Vincent, Simone J Rochfort, Jennie E Pryce, Ian J Lean
{"title":"Associations among body condition score, body weight, and serum biochemistry in dairy cows.","authors":"David B Sheedy, Helen M Golder, Sergio C Garcia, Priyanka Reddy, Joanne E Hemsworth, Delphine E Vincent, Simone J Rochfort, Jennie E Pryce, Ian J Lean","doi":"10.3168/jds.2024-25425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Body condition score and BW yield insights into body tissue reserves and diet, and serum biochemical measures reflect the metabolic status of cows. Associations between body composition measures and biochemistry are unclear and investigation may reveal important information on the metabolic and physiological status of cattle with varying levels of labile tissue reserves. Cohorts of 739 nonlactating, late-pregnancy, dry cows (26.9 d prepartum, SD = 12.4) and 690 peak-milk cows (58.0 DIM, SD = 14.5) were selected by stratified (parity: 1, 2, 3, >3) random sampling from 30 farms (15 pasture, 15 TMR) in this cross-sectional study. A single serum, BCS (1-5 scale), BW, and milk-production datum was collected per cow, per cohort between November 2022 and July 2023. Eleven analytes were collected, analyzed, and standardized within group (cohort/breed/farm). Mixed linear models for BCS and BW were specified, with the random effect of group. A 6-point, unordered, categorical body-group classification that combined BCS (greater, equal to, or less than group median; as high, median or low BCS) and BW (greater or less than group median; as high or low BW) was analyzed by polytomous logistic regression. Effect sizes are listed for a 1 SD increase in the specified analyte, keeping other covariables at their mean value. Dry BCS was positively associated with albumin (0.075 BCS ± 0.014 SE), urea (0.038 BCS ± 0.014 SE) and glucose (0.052 BCS ± 0.014 SE), and negatively with the interaction between cholesterol and days precalving. Dry BW positively associated with albumin (11.03 kg ± 2.48 SE) and negatively with cholesterol (-8.47 kg ± 2.57 SE). Peak-milk BCS was positively associated with albumin (0.47 BCS ± 0.015 SE), BHB (0.048 BCS ± 0.015 SE) and glucose (0.051 BCS ± 0.015 SE). Peak-milk BW was positively associated with albumin (6.94 kg ± 2.35 SE) and negatively with Ca (-7.02 kg ± 2.33 SE). Increasing BW and decreasing BCS was associated with increasing parity, except in dry second-parity cows that had low BCS. The dry polytomous model associated a 1 SD increase in albumin with a 4.89% ± 1.56 SE decreased risk of being low BCS and low BW and 5.87% ± 1.46 SE increased risk of high BCS and high BW. Risk change associated with 1 SD of glucose was -5.61% ± 1.58 SE for low BCS and high BW and 3.17% ± 1.58 SE for high BCS and high BW. For the peak-milk cohort, change in risk was associated with albumin for low BCS and low BW -3.67% ± 1.56 SE, low BCS and high BW -3.22% ± 1.53 SE. Risk change with 1 SD of BHB was -3.36% ± 1.47 SE for median BCS and low BW, 2.86% ± 1.44 SE for high BCS and low BW, and 2.69% ± 1.37 SE for high BCS and high BW. Risk of low BCS and low BW was greatest in second-parity cows, and high BCS and high BW was greatest in dry cows with greater than third parity and third-parity cows in peak milk. There were no interactions between parity and analytes. Albumin was consistently associated with BCS and BW, potentially reflecting innate differences in protein metabolism of cows.</p>","PeriodicalId":354,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dairy Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dairy Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2024-25425","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Body condition score and BW yield insights into body tissue reserves and diet, and serum biochemical measures reflect the metabolic status of cows. Associations between body composition measures and biochemistry are unclear and investigation may reveal important information on the metabolic and physiological status of cattle with varying levels of labile tissue reserves. Cohorts of 739 nonlactating, late-pregnancy, dry cows (26.9 d prepartum, SD = 12.4) and 690 peak-milk cows (58.0 DIM, SD = 14.5) were selected by stratified (parity: 1, 2, 3, >3) random sampling from 30 farms (15 pasture, 15 TMR) in this cross-sectional study. A single serum, BCS (1-5 scale), BW, and milk-production datum was collected per cow, per cohort between November 2022 and July 2023. Eleven analytes were collected, analyzed, and standardized within group (cohort/breed/farm). Mixed linear models for BCS and BW were specified, with the random effect of group. A 6-point, unordered, categorical body-group classification that combined BCS (greater, equal to, or less than group median; as high, median or low BCS) and BW (greater or less than group median; as high or low BW) was analyzed by polytomous logistic regression. Effect sizes are listed for a 1 SD increase in the specified analyte, keeping other covariables at their mean value. Dry BCS was positively associated with albumin (0.075 BCS ± 0.014 SE), urea (0.038 BCS ± 0.014 SE) and glucose (0.052 BCS ± 0.014 SE), and negatively with the interaction between cholesterol and days precalving. Dry BW positively associated with albumin (11.03 kg ± 2.48 SE) and negatively with cholesterol (-8.47 kg ± 2.57 SE). Peak-milk BCS was positively associated with albumin (0.47 BCS ± 0.015 SE), BHB (0.048 BCS ± 0.015 SE) and glucose (0.051 BCS ± 0.015 SE). Peak-milk BW was positively associated with albumin (6.94 kg ± 2.35 SE) and negatively with Ca (-7.02 kg ± 2.33 SE). Increasing BW and decreasing BCS was associated with increasing parity, except in dry second-parity cows that had low BCS. The dry polytomous model associated a 1 SD increase in albumin with a 4.89% ± 1.56 SE decreased risk of being low BCS and low BW and 5.87% ± 1.46 SE increased risk of high BCS and high BW. Risk change associated with 1 SD of glucose was -5.61% ± 1.58 SE for low BCS and high BW and 3.17% ± 1.58 SE for high BCS and high BW. For the peak-milk cohort, change in risk was associated with albumin for low BCS and low BW -3.67% ± 1.56 SE, low BCS and high BW -3.22% ± 1.53 SE. Risk change with 1 SD of BHB was -3.36% ± 1.47 SE for median BCS and low BW, 2.86% ± 1.44 SE for high BCS and low BW, and 2.69% ± 1.37 SE for high BCS and high BW. Risk of low BCS and low BW was greatest in second-parity cows, and high BCS and high BW was greatest in dry cows with greater than third parity and third-parity cows in peak milk. There were no interactions between parity and analytes. Albumin was consistently associated with BCS and BW, potentially reflecting innate differences in protein metabolism of cows.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过体况评分和体重可了解体内组织储备和饮食情况,而血清生化指标则可反映奶牛的新陈代谢状况。体成分测定和生化指标之间的关系尚不清楚,调查可能会揭示具有不同水平易变组织储备的牛的代谢和生理状态的重要信息。在这项横断面研究中,通过分层(parity:1、2、3、>3)随机抽样,从 30 个牧场(15 个牧场,15 个 TMR)挑选了 739 头非泌乳期、妊娠后期、干奶牛(产前 26.9 d,SD = 12.4)和 690 头高峰奶牛(58.0 DIM,SD = 14.5)。2022 年 11 月至 2023 年 7 月期间,每群奶牛采集一次血清、BCS(1-5 级)、体重和产奶量数据。在组内(群组/品种/牧场)收集、分析和标准化了 11 种分析物。对 BCS 和 BW 建立了混合线性模型,组别为随机效应。结合 BCS(大于、等于或小于组别中位数;BCS 为高、中位数或低)和 BW(大于或小于组别中位数;BW 为高或低)的 6 点无序分类体质组别分类,通过多态逻辑回归进行分析。在其他协变量保持均值的情况下,列出了特定分析物增加 1 SD 的效应大小。干 BCS 与白蛋白(0.075 BCS ± 0.014 SE)、尿素(0.038 BCS ± 0.014 SE)和葡萄糖(0.052 BCS ± 0.014 SE)呈正相关,与胆固醇和产前天数之间的交互作用呈负相关。干体重与白蛋白呈正相关(11.03 kg ± 2.48 SE),与胆固醇呈负相关(-8.47 kg ± 2.57 SE)。高峰乳 BCS 与白蛋白(0.47 BCS ± 0.015 SE)、BHB(0.048 BCS ± 0.015 SE)和葡萄糖(0.051 BCS ± 0.015 SE)呈正相关。峰奶体重与白蛋白(6.94 kg ± 2.35 SE)呈正相关,与钙(-7.02 kg ± 2.33 SE)呈负相关。除了BCS较低的干性二胎奶牛外,BW的增加和BCS的降低与胎次的增加有关。干重多项式模型显示,白蛋白增加 1 SD,低 BCS 和低体重的风险降低 4.89% ± 1.56 SE,高 BCS 和高体重的风险增加 5.87% ± 1.46 SE。与 1 SD 葡萄糖相关的风险变化对于低 BCS 和高 BW 为 -5.61% ± 1.58 SE,对于高 BCS 和高 BW 为 3.17% ± 1.58 SE。对于高峰牛奶队列,低 BCS 和低 BW 的风险变化与白蛋白相关,为 -3.67% ± 1.56 SE,低 BCS 和高 BW 的风险变化与白蛋白相关,为 -3.22% ± 1.53 SE。对于中位 BCS 和低体重,1 SD BHB 的风险变化为 -3.36% ± 1.47 SE;对于高 BCS 和低体重,为 2.86% ± 1.44 SE;对于高 BCS 和高体重,为 2.69% ± 1.37 SE。低BCS和低体重的风险在二胎奶牛中最大,高BCS和高体重的风险在三胎以上的干奶牛和处于高峰期的三胎奶牛中最大。胎次与分析物之间没有交互作用。白蛋白始终与BCS和体重相关,这可能反映了奶牛蛋白质代谢的先天差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Dairy Science
Journal of Dairy Science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
17.10%
发文量
784
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the American Dairy Science Association®, Journal of Dairy Science® (JDS) is the leading peer-reviewed general dairy research journal in the world. JDS readers represent education, industry, and government agencies in more than 70 countries with interests in biochemistry, breeding, economics, engineering, environment, food science, genetics, microbiology, nutrition, pathology, physiology, processing, public health, quality assurance, and sanitation.
期刊最新文献
Assessing milk urea nitrogen as an indicator of protein nutrition and nitrogen utilization efficiency: A meta-analysis. Associations among body condition score, body weight, and serum biochemistry in dairy cows. Canonical prolactin signaling and global mRNA expression in the skin of Holstein heifers carrying the SLICK1 allele of the prolactin receptor gene. Characterization of grazing Holstein-Friesian dairy cows based on a combination of nitrogen use efficiency and nitrogen balance. Combining High Pressure Processing and Low Storage Temperature to Extend the Functionality Shelf Life of Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1