Small pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (≤ 2 cm): different imaging and clinicopathologic features according to extrapancreatic extension

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Abdominal Radiology Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1007/s00261-025-04831-0
Rae Rim Ryu, Jung Hoon Kim, Junghoan Park, Sungjun Hwang
{"title":"Small pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (≤ 2 cm): different imaging and clinicopathologic features according to extrapancreatic extension","authors":"Rae Rim Ryu,&nbsp;Jung Hoon Kim,&nbsp;Junghoan Park,&nbsp;Sungjun Hwang","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-04831-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To assess features of small pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (s-PDA, ≤ 2 cm) according to extrapancreatic extension (EPE) and predictors for recurrence.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with s-PDA who underwent surgery between January 2004 and October 2021. Preoperative CT or MRI images were reviewed by two reviewers. Imaging and clinicopathologic features of s-PDA were compared according to the presence of EPE. Cox regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of recurrence.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>142 patients (77 men; 64.7 ± 9.3 years) who underwent preoperative CT (<i>n</i> = 134) or MRI (<i>n</i> = 115) were included. Duct dilatation was a common imaging finding of s-PDA (CT: 75.4%, MRI: 82.6%). Of the 142 patients, 21.8% (31/142) had no EPE, while 78.2% (111/142) had EPE. Tumor size on CT (14.3 ± 8.7 mm vs. 18.2 ± 6.5 mm, <i>p</i> =.01) and abutment or encasement of superior mesenteric vein (13.8% vs. 40.9%, <i>p</i> =.02) on CT were different according to absence or presence of EPE. Recurrence was more common in s-PDA with EPE (32.3% [10/31] vs. 53.2% [59/111], <i>p</i> =.04). Pathologic tumor size (HR 1.103, 95% CI 1.020–1.193, <i>p</i> =.01), tumor size on MRI (HR 1.044, 95% CI 1.001–1.090, <i>p</i> =.048), and extrapancreatic neural invasion on MRI (HR 3.341, 95% CI 1.564–7.140, <i>p</i> =.002) were significant predictors of recurrence.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Even in s-PDA, tumors with EPE are larger and show higher recurrence rates. Imaging features are important for predicting presence of EPE.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":"50 9","pages":"4168 - 4180"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12331785/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00261-025-04831-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To assess features of small pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (s-PDA, ≤ 2 cm) according to extrapancreatic extension (EPE) and predictors for recurrence.

Methods

This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with s-PDA who underwent surgery between January 2004 and October 2021. Preoperative CT or MRI images were reviewed by two reviewers. Imaging and clinicopathologic features of s-PDA were compared according to the presence of EPE. Cox regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of recurrence.

Results

142 patients (77 men; 64.7 ± 9.3 years) who underwent preoperative CT (n = 134) or MRI (n = 115) were included. Duct dilatation was a common imaging finding of s-PDA (CT: 75.4%, MRI: 82.6%). Of the 142 patients, 21.8% (31/142) had no EPE, while 78.2% (111/142) had EPE. Tumor size on CT (14.3 ± 8.7 mm vs. 18.2 ± 6.5 mm, p =.01) and abutment or encasement of superior mesenteric vein (13.8% vs. 40.9%, p =.02) on CT were different according to absence or presence of EPE. Recurrence was more common in s-PDA with EPE (32.3% [10/31] vs. 53.2% [59/111], p =.04). Pathologic tumor size (HR 1.103, 95% CI 1.020–1.193, p =.01), tumor size on MRI (HR 1.044, 95% CI 1.001–1.090, p =.048), and extrapancreatic neural invasion on MRI (HR 3.341, 95% CI 1.564–7.140, p =.002) were significant predictors of recurrence.

Conclusion

Even in s-PDA, tumors with EPE are larger and show higher recurrence rates. Imaging features are important for predicting presence of EPE.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小胰腺导管腺癌(≤2 cm):根据胰腺外延伸的不同表现出不同的影像学和临床病理特征。
目的:探讨小胰腺导管腺癌(s-PDA,≤2 cm)的胰腺外延伸(EPE)特征及复发预测因素。方法:这项回顾性研究包括2004年1月至2021年10月期间接受手术诊断为s-PDA的患者。术前CT或MRI图像由两名审查员审查。根据有无EPE,比较s-PDA的影像学和临床病理特征。进行Cox回归分析以确定复发的预测因素。结果:142例患者(男性77例;64.7±9.3岁,术前行CT (n = 134)或MRI (n = 115)检查。导管扩张是s-PDA的常见影像学表现(CT: 75.4%, MRI: 82.6%)。142例患者中,无EPE占21.8%(31/142),有EPE占78.2%(111/142)。CT显示肿瘤大小(14.3±8.7 mm vs. 18.2±6.5 mm, p = 0.01)和肠系膜上静脉基台或卡套(13.8% vs. 40.9%, p = 0.02)因有无EPE而异。s-PDA合并EPE的复发率更高(32.3% [10/31]vs. 53.2% [59/111], p = 0.04)。病理肿瘤大小(HR 1.103, 95% CI 1.020 ~ 1.193, p = 0.01)、MRI上肿瘤大小(HR 1.044, 95% CI 1.001 ~ 1.090, p = 0.048)和MRI上胰腺外神经侵犯(HR 3.341, 95% CI 1.564 ~ 7.140, p = 0.002)是复发的显著预测因子。结论:即使在s-PDA中,伴有EPE的肿瘤也较大,复发率较高。影像学特征是预测EPE存在的重要依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Abdominal Radiology
Abdominal Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
334
期刊介绍: Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section. Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology: · Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) · Published in Cooperation with: European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR) · Efficient handling and Expeditious review · Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style · Global readership · Readers can earn CME credits
期刊最新文献
Navigating the new frontier: growth, integrity, and our vision for 2026 From duodenitis to stricture: Decoding the impact of partial annular pancreas over years A CT-based 2.5D deep learning model for preoperative T-staging in gastric cancer: a retrospective multicenter study Early and delayed post-cesarean complications: an imaging review 18F-FDG PET-based ensemble deep learning model for the prediction of lymphovascular invasion in colorectal cancer patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1