Rae Rim Ryu, Jung Hoon Kim, Junghoan Park, Sungjun Hwang
{"title":"Small pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (≤ 2 cm): different imaging and clinicopathologic features according to extrapancreatic extension.","authors":"Rae Rim Ryu, Jung Hoon Kim, Junghoan Park, Sungjun Hwang","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-04831-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess features of small pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (s-PDA, ≤ 2 cm) according to extrapancreatic extension (EPE) and predictors for recurrence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with s-PDA who underwent surgery between January 2004 and October 2021. Preoperative CT or MRI images were reviewed by two reviewers. Imaging and clinicopathologic features of s-PDA were compared according to the presence of EPE. Cox regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of recurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>142 patients (77 men; 64.7 ± 9.3 years) who underwent preoperative CT (n = 134) or MRI (n = 115) were included. Duct dilatation was a common imaging finding of s-PDA (CT: 75.4%, MRI: 82.6%). Of the 142 patients, 21.8% (31/142) had no EPE, while 78.2% (111/142) had EPE. Tumor size on CT (14.3 ± 8.7 mm vs. 18.2 ± 6.5 mm, p =.01) and abutment or encasement of superior mesenteric vein (13.8% vs. 40.9%, p =.02) on CT were different according to absence or presence of EPE. Recurrence was more common in s-PDA with EPE (32.3% [10/31] vs. 53.2% [59/111], p =.04). Pathologic tumor size (HR 1.103, 95% CI 1.020-1.193, p =.01), tumor size on MRI (HR 1.044, 95% CI 1.001-1.090, p =.048), and extrapancreatic neural invasion on MRI (HR 3.341, 95% CI 1.564-7.140, p =.002) were significant predictors of recurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even in s-PDA, tumors with EPE are larger and show higher recurrence rates. Imaging features are important for predicting presence of EPE.</p>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-04831-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To assess features of small pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (s-PDA, ≤ 2 cm) according to extrapancreatic extension (EPE) and predictors for recurrence.
Methods: This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with s-PDA who underwent surgery between January 2004 and October 2021. Preoperative CT or MRI images were reviewed by two reviewers. Imaging and clinicopathologic features of s-PDA were compared according to the presence of EPE. Cox regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of recurrence.
Results: 142 patients (77 men; 64.7 ± 9.3 years) who underwent preoperative CT (n = 134) or MRI (n = 115) were included. Duct dilatation was a common imaging finding of s-PDA (CT: 75.4%, MRI: 82.6%). Of the 142 patients, 21.8% (31/142) had no EPE, while 78.2% (111/142) had EPE. Tumor size on CT (14.3 ± 8.7 mm vs. 18.2 ± 6.5 mm, p =.01) and abutment or encasement of superior mesenteric vein (13.8% vs. 40.9%, p =.02) on CT were different according to absence or presence of EPE. Recurrence was more common in s-PDA with EPE (32.3% [10/31] vs. 53.2% [59/111], p =.04). Pathologic tumor size (HR 1.103, 95% CI 1.020-1.193, p =.01), tumor size on MRI (HR 1.044, 95% CI 1.001-1.090, p =.048), and extrapancreatic neural invasion on MRI (HR 3.341, 95% CI 1.564-7.140, p =.002) were significant predictors of recurrence.
Conclusion: Even in s-PDA, tumors with EPE are larger and show higher recurrence rates. Imaging features are important for predicting presence of EPE.
期刊介绍:
Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section.
Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology:
· Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR)
· Published in Cooperation with:
European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR)
European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR)
Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR)
· Efficient handling and Expeditious review
· Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style
· Global readership
· Readers can earn CME credits