Rae Rim Ryu, Jung Hoon Kim, Junghoan Park, Sungjun Hwang
{"title":"Small pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (≤ 2 cm): different imaging and clinicopathologic features according to extrapancreatic extension","authors":"Rae Rim Ryu, Jung Hoon Kim, Junghoan Park, Sungjun Hwang","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-04831-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To assess features of small pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (s-PDA, ≤ 2 cm) according to extrapancreatic extension (EPE) and predictors for recurrence.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with s-PDA who underwent surgery between January 2004 and October 2021. Preoperative CT or MRI images were reviewed by two reviewers. Imaging and clinicopathologic features of s-PDA were compared according to the presence of EPE. Cox regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of recurrence.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>142 patients (77 men; 64.7 ± 9.3 years) who underwent preoperative CT (<i>n</i> = 134) or MRI (<i>n</i> = 115) were included. Duct dilatation was a common imaging finding of s-PDA (CT: 75.4%, MRI: 82.6%). Of the 142 patients, 21.8% (31/142) had no EPE, while 78.2% (111/142) had EPE. Tumor size on CT (14.3 ± 8.7 mm vs. 18.2 ± 6.5 mm, <i>p</i> =.01) and abutment or encasement of superior mesenteric vein (13.8% vs. 40.9%, <i>p</i> =.02) on CT were different according to absence or presence of EPE. Recurrence was more common in s-PDA with EPE (32.3% [10/31] vs. 53.2% [59/111], <i>p</i> =.04). Pathologic tumor size (HR 1.103, 95% CI 1.020–1.193, <i>p</i> =.01), tumor size on MRI (HR 1.044, 95% CI 1.001–1.090, <i>p</i> =.048), and extrapancreatic neural invasion on MRI (HR 3.341, 95% CI 1.564–7.140, <i>p</i> =.002) were significant predictors of recurrence.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Even in s-PDA, tumors with EPE are larger and show higher recurrence rates. Imaging features are important for predicting presence of EPE.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":"50 9","pages":"4168 - 4180"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12331785/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00261-025-04831-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
To assess features of small pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (s-PDA, ≤ 2 cm) according to extrapancreatic extension (EPE) and predictors for recurrence.
Methods
This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with s-PDA who underwent surgery between January 2004 and October 2021. Preoperative CT or MRI images were reviewed by two reviewers. Imaging and clinicopathologic features of s-PDA were compared according to the presence of EPE. Cox regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of recurrence.
Results
142 patients (77 men; 64.7 ± 9.3 years) who underwent preoperative CT (n = 134) or MRI (n = 115) were included. Duct dilatation was a common imaging finding of s-PDA (CT: 75.4%, MRI: 82.6%). Of the 142 patients, 21.8% (31/142) had no EPE, while 78.2% (111/142) had EPE. Tumor size on CT (14.3 ± 8.7 mm vs. 18.2 ± 6.5 mm, p =.01) and abutment or encasement of superior mesenteric vein (13.8% vs. 40.9%, p =.02) on CT were different according to absence or presence of EPE. Recurrence was more common in s-PDA with EPE (32.3% [10/31] vs. 53.2% [59/111], p =.04). Pathologic tumor size (HR 1.103, 95% CI 1.020–1.193, p =.01), tumor size on MRI (HR 1.044, 95% CI 1.001–1.090, p =.048), and extrapancreatic neural invasion on MRI (HR 3.341, 95% CI 1.564–7.140, p =.002) were significant predictors of recurrence.
Conclusion
Even in s-PDA, tumors with EPE are larger and show higher recurrence rates. Imaging features are important for predicting presence of EPE.
目的:探讨小胰腺导管腺癌(s-PDA,≤2 cm)的胰腺外延伸(EPE)特征及复发预测因素。方法:这项回顾性研究包括2004年1月至2021年10月期间接受手术诊断为s-PDA的患者。术前CT或MRI图像由两名审查员审查。根据有无EPE,比较s-PDA的影像学和临床病理特征。进行Cox回归分析以确定复发的预测因素。结果:142例患者(男性77例;64.7±9.3岁,术前行CT (n = 134)或MRI (n = 115)检查。导管扩张是s-PDA的常见影像学表现(CT: 75.4%, MRI: 82.6%)。142例患者中,无EPE占21.8%(31/142),有EPE占78.2%(111/142)。CT显示肿瘤大小(14.3±8.7 mm vs. 18.2±6.5 mm, p = 0.01)和肠系膜上静脉基台或卡套(13.8% vs. 40.9%, p = 0.02)因有无EPE而异。s-PDA合并EPE的复发率更高(32.3% [10/31]vs. 53.2% [59/111], p = 0.04)。病理肿瘤大小(HR 1.103, 95% CI 1.020 ~ 1.193, p = 0.01)、MRI上肿瘤大小(HR 1.044, 95% CI 1.001 ~ 1.090, p = 0.048)和MRI上胰腺外神经侵犯(HR 3.341, 95% CI 1.564 ~ 7.140, p = 0.002)是复发的显著预测因子。结论:即使在s-PDA中,伴有EPE的肿瘤也较大,复发率较高。影像学特征是预测EPE存在的重要依据。
期刊介绍:
Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section.
Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology:
· Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR)
· Published in Cooperation with:
European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR)
European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR)
Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR)
· Efficient handling and Expeditious review
· Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style
· Global readership
· Readers can earn CME credits