{"title":"Common Forms of Adult Esotropia Require Augmented Surgical Dosing","authors":"Veronika Yehezkeli , Joseph L. Demer","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.02.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Age-related distance esotropia (ARDE) in older adults is commonly caused by sagging eye syndrome. Decompensated esophoria (DE) is a progressive esotropia in younger adults. We evaluated claims that dosing of medial rectus (MR) recession must appreciably exceed customary recommendations to avert surgical undercorrections in treatment of DE and ARDE.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>Comparative interventional case series.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We compared with Parks’ tables the actual dosing of strabismus surgery that included bilateral MR recession in consecutive patients with DE and ARDE from 2015 to 2024.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Strabismus surgery was performed in 54 DE patients of mean age 31 ± 12 years (standard deviation) and 61 ARDE patients of age 70 ± 8 years. Preoperative esotropia was significantly greater in DE at 21 ± 10Δ than 14 ± 9Δ in ARDE (<em>P</em> = .0003). Although surgery initially produced orthotropia in most patients in both groups, esotropia gradually recurred in 10 DE patients (22%) after a mean of 3 ± 1.3 years, due to greater decline in surgical effect than in ARDE (<em>P</em> = .0022). There was no correlation between the use of adjustable sutures and reoperation (<em>P</em> = .73). Regression analysis indicated that the initial 4.6 mm MR recession in DE and 3.5 mm in ARDE had no effect on final alignment, but each additional mm total MR recession corrected 3Δ in DE and 2.4Δ in ARDE. These surgical effects are less than predicted by Parks tables.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Current recommendations for augmented MR recession in ARDE are appropriate, but dosing must be further augmented to achieve satisfactory alignment in DE to avoid undercorrections caused by early recurrences of esotropia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"273 ","pages":"Pages 74-81"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002939425000571","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Age-related distance esotropia (ARDE) in older adults is commonly caused by sagging eye syndrome. Decompensated esophoria (DE) is a progressive esotropia in younger adults. We evaluated claims that dosing of medial rectus (MR) recession must appreciably exceed customary recommendations to avert surgical undercorrections in treatment of DE and ARDE.
Study Design
Comparative interventional case series.
Methods
We compared with Parks’ tables the actual dosing of strabismus surgery that included bilateral MR recession in consecutive patients with DE and ARDE from 2015 to 2024.
Results
Strabismus surgery was performed in 54 DE patients of mean age 31 ± 12 years (standard deviation) and 61 ARDE patients of age 70 ± 8 years. Preoperative esotropia was significantly greater in DE at 21 ± 10Δ than 14 ± 9Δ in ARDE (P = .0003). Although surgery initially produced orthotropia in most patients in both groups, esotropia gradually recurred in 10 DE patients (22%) after a mean of 3 ± 1.3 years, due to greater decline in surgical effect than in ARDE (P = .0022). There was no correlation between the use of adjustable sutures and reoperation (P = .73). Regression analysis indicated that the initial 4.6 mm MR recession in DE and 3.5 mm in ARDE had no effect on final alignment, but each additional mm total MR recession corrected 3Δ in DE and 2.4Δ in ARDE. These surgical effects are less than predicted by Parks tables.
Conclusions
Current recommendations for augmented MR recession in ARDE are appropriate, but dosing must be further augmented to achieve satisfactory alignment in DE to avoid undercorrections caused by early recurrences of esotropia.
老年人年龄相关性距离内斜视(ARDE)通常是由眼下垂综合征引起的。失代偿性内斜视(DE)是一种进行性内斜视。我们评估了内侧直肌(MR)收缩的剂量必须明显超过常规建议,以避免DE和ARDE治疗中的手术矫正不足。研究设计:比较介入病例系列。方法:我们将2015年至2024年连续DE和ARDE患者的斜视手术包括双侧MR衰退的实际剂量与Parks的表进行比较。结果:54例斜视患者行斜视手术,平均年龄31±12岁(标准差),61例ARDE患者,年龄70±8岁。DE患者术前内斜视21±10Δ明显高于ARDE患者术前内斜视14±9Δ (p=0.0003)。尽管两组中大多数患者最初的手术都产生了正斜视,但10例DE患者(22%)在平均3±1.3年后逐渐复发内斜视,这是由于手术效果的下降幅度大于ARDE (P=0.0022)。可调节缝线的使用与再手术无相关性(p=0.73)。回归分析表明,DE的4.6 mm MR退行和ARDE的3.5 mm MR退行对最终对准没有影响,但每增加mm MR退行对DE和ARDE的3Δ和2.4Δ都有修正。这些手术效果比帕克斯表预测的要小。结论:目前针对ARDE的MR增强退行治疗建议是适当的,但必须进一步加大剂量以达到令人满意的DE对齐,以避免内斜视早期复发引起的矫正不足。
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and visual science specialists describing clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations. Published monthly since 1884, the full text of the American Journal of Ophthalmology and supplementary material are also presented online at www.AJO.com and on ScienceDirect.
The American Journal of Ophthalmology publishes Full-Length Articles, Perspectives, Editorials, Correspondences, Books Reports and Announcements. Brief Reports and Case Reports are no longer published. We recommend submitting Brief Reports and Case Reports to our companion publication, the American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports.
Manuscripts are accepted with the understanding that they have not been and will not be published elsewhere substantially in any format, and that there are no ethical problems with the content or data collection. Authors may be requested to produce the data upon which the manuscript is based and to answer expeditiously any questions about the manuscript or its authors.