Correlation between gallstones and fasting blood glucose to serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio among American adults.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Frontiers in Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmed.2025.1528613
Bo Wu, Huachao Zheng, Caixiang Zhuang, Jiesheng Mao, Luo Yuncheng, Lidong Huang, Min Li, Zhao Feiyang, Sisi Lin, Pengwei Wang, Yiren Hu
{"title":"Correlation between gallstones and fasting blood glucose to serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio among American adults.","authors":"Bo Wu, Huachao Zheng, Caixiang Zhuang, Jiesheng Mao, Luo Yuncheng, Lidong Huang, Min Li, Zhao Feiyang, Sisi Lin, Pengwei Wang, Yiren Hu","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2025.1528613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research indicates that the ratio of fasting blood glucose (FBG) to serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (GHR) can accurately predict many diseases. Nevertheless, the relationship between GHR and the risk of gallbladder stones remains unclear. This study investigates the possible relationship between GHR and the incidence of gallbladder stones.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This research used information gathered from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) between March 2017 and March 2020. A calculation was made to determine the GHR by dividing the fasting blood glucose level by the HDL-C level. Several statistical methods, including analysis of threshold effects, smoothed curve fitting, multiple logistic regression modeling, and subgroup analysis, were utilized to investigate the connection between GHR and gallstones.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 3898 U.S. adults, GHR was significantly positively associated with the prevalence of gallbladder stones. In a fully adjusted model, the incidence of gallbladder stones increased by 7% with each 1-unit increase in GHR (OR [95% Cl] = 1.07 [1.02, 1.14]). Compared with members in the low group, those in the high group had a 100% higher likelihood of getting gallbladder stones (OR [95% CI] = 2.00 [1.31, 3.04]), and this stabilizing connection was always present in the different subgroups. With the help of smooth curve fitting, the research also showed that there was a connection that was formed like an upside-down L shape between GHR and gallbladder stones. The analysis of the threshold effect revealed that the inflection point was 4.28.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results revealed an inverted L-shaped connection between GHR and gallbladder stones. Keeping GHR levels within a certain range is associated with a lower incidence of gallstones in the general population.</p>","PeriodicalId":12488,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"1528613"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11821630/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1528613","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Research indicates that the ratio of fasting blood glucose (FBG) to serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (GHR) can accurately predict many diseases. Nevertheless, the relationship between GHR and the risk of gallbladder stones remains unclear. This study investigates the possible relationship between GHR and the incidence of gallbladder stones.

Methods: This research used information gathered from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) between March 2017 and March 2020. A calculation was made to determine the GHR by dividing the fasting blood glucose level by the HDL-C level. Several statistical methods, including analysis of threshold effects, smoothed curve fitting, multiple logistic regression modeling, and subgroup analysis, were utilized to investigate the connection between GHR and gallstones.

Results: In 3898 U.S. adults, GHR was significantly positively associated with the prevalence of gallbladder stones. In a fully adjusted model, the incidence of gallbladder stones increased by 7% with each 1-unit increase in GHR (OR [95% Cl] = 1.07 [1.02, 1.14]). Compared with members in the low group, those in the high group had a 100% higher likelihood of getting gallbladder stones (OR [95% CI] = 2.00 [1.31, 3.04]), and this stabilizing connection was always present in the different subgroups. With the help of smooth curve fitting, the research also showed that there was a connection that was formed like an upside-down L shape between GHR and gallbladder stones. The analysis of the threshold effect revealed that the inflection point was 4.28.

Conclusion: The results revealed an inverted L-shaped connection between GHR and gallbladder stones. Keeping GHR levels within a certain range is associated with a lower incidence of gallstones in the general population.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国成年人胆结石与空腹血糖与血清高密度脂蛋白胆固醇比值的相关性
背景:研究表明,空腹血糖(FBG)与血清高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C) (GHR)的比值可以准确预测多种疾病。然而,GHR与胆结石风险之间的关系尚不清楚。本研究探讨GHR与胆囊结石发生率之间的可能关系。方法:本研究使用了2017年3月至2020年3月期间国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)收集的信息。用空腹血糖水平除以HDL-C水平计算GHR。采用阈值效应分析、平滑曲线拟合、多元logistic回归模型、亚组分析等统计方法探讨GHR与胆结石的关系。结果:在3898名美国成年人中,GHR与胆囊结石的患病率显著正相关。在完全调整后的模型中,GHR每增加1个单位,胆囊结石的发生率就增加7% (OR [95% Cl] = 1.07[1.02, 1.14])。与低组成员相比,高组成员患胆囊结石的可能性高出100% (OR [95% CI] = 2.00[1.31, 3.04]),并且这种稳定联系在不同的亚组中始终存在。在光滑曲线拟合的帮助下,研究还表明GHR与胆囊结石之间存在一种类似倒L型的联系。阈值效应分析表明,拐点为4.28。结论:GHR与胆囊结石呈倒l型关系。将GHR水平保持在一定范围内与一般人群中较低的胆结石发生率有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers in Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
3710
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Medicine publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research linking basic research to clinical practice and patient care, as well as translating scientific advances into new therapies and diagnostic tools. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. In addition to papers that provide a link between basic research and clinical practice, a particular emphasis is given to studies that are directly relevant to patient care. In this spirit, the journal publishes the latest research results and medical knowledge that facilitate the translation of scientific advances into new therapies or diagnostic tools. The full listing of the Specialty Sections represented by Frontiers in Medicine is as listed below. As well as the established medical disciplines, Frontiers in Medicine is launching new sections that together will facilitate - the use of patient-reported outcomes under real world conditions - the exploitation of big data and the use of novel information and communication tools in the assessment of new medicines - the scientific bases for guidelines and decisions from regulatory authorities - access to medicinal products and medical devices worldwide - addressing the grand health challenges around the world
期刊最新文献
Immune checkpoint imbalance in ANCA-associated vasculitis: insights into disease activity and precision immunotherapy. Symptom experience subtypes and their association with social isolation in older adults with diabetes and coronary heart disease: a latent profile analysis study. Multimodal imaging features of non-proliferative and proliferative diabetic retinopathy based on SD-OCT and fundus autofluorescence. The unregulated majority: who ensures quality in non-submission real-world studies? Performance of large language models on sleep medicine certification examination: a comprehensive multi-model analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1