Understanding the implementation process of the Adult Day Services Plus program.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY BMC Geriatrics Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1186/s12877-025-05757-4
Quinton D Cotton, Dionne Bailey, Elle Albers, Steph Ingvalson, Emily Bloomquist, Katie Marx, Keith Anderson, Holly Dabelko-Schoeny, Lauren Parker, Laura N Gitlin, Joseph E Gaugler
{"title":"Understanding the implementation process of the Adult Day Services Plus program.","authors":"Quinton D Cotton, Dionne Bailey, Elle Albers, Steph Ingvalson, Emily Bloomquist, Katie Marx, Keith Anderson, Holly Dabelko-Schoeny, Lauren Parker, Laura N Gitlin, Joseph E Gaugler","doi":"10.1186/s12877-025-05757-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Among the available evidence-based interventions targeting dementia family caregivers, there is limited evidence on implementation processes that produce desired outcomes (i.e., reductions in depression and burden) for caregivers, people living with dementia (PLWD), and community-based programs themselves. In a national multi-site hybrid effectiveness trial, we investigated the implementation success and challenges of embedding an evidence-based intervention (ADS Plus) targeting dementia family caregivers whose PLWD was enrolled in an adult day service (ADS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we conducted a directed qualitative content analysis to understand caregiver (n = 15) and staff (n = 14) perceptions of facilitators of and potential barriers to implementation of ADS Plus in nine ADS programs to guide future dissemination efforts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results demonstrated that successful delivery of ADS Plus was achieved through intervention adaptability, personalization, and structure (innovation); responsiveness of ADS Plus to external changes and intervention marketability (outer domain); presence of aligned goals and familiarity (inner setting); involvement of research staff, connections among practitioners, and meeting caregiver needs (individual domain); and understanding caregivers' needs and addressing staff capacity to take action (implementation process). This adaptability reassures us of the potential to implement ADS Plus in heterogeneous programmatic settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Globally, our results demonstrate that ADS Plus offers a viable community-based solution for supporting dementia family caregivers with high implementation potential for diverse ADS settings.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02927821 (Registration Date 10/7/2016).</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":"25 1","pages":"95"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11823245/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-05757-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Among the available evidence-based interventions targeting dementia family caregivers, there is limited evidence on implementation processes that produce desired outcomes (i.e., reductions in depression and burden) for caregivers, people living with dementia (PLWD), and community-based programs themselves. In a national multi-site hybrid effectiveness trial, we investigated the implementation success and challenges of embedding an evidence-based intervention (ADS Plus) targeting dementia family caregivers whose PLWD was enrolled in an adult day service (ADS).

Methods: Informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we conducted a directed qualitative content analysis to understand caregiver (n = 15) and staff (n = 14) perceptions of facilitators of and potential barriers to implementation of ADS Plus in nine ADS programs to guide future dissemination efforts.

Results: Results demonstrated that successful delivery of ADS Plus was achieved through intervention adaptability, personalization, and structure (innovation); responsiveness of ADS Plus to external changes and intervention marketability (outer domain); presence of aligned goals and familiarity (inner setting); involvement of research staff, connections among practitioners, and meeting caregiver needs (individual domain); and understanding caregivers' needs and addressing staff capacity to take action (implementation process). This adaptability reassures us of the potential to implement ADS Plus in heterogeneous programmatic settings.

Conclusion: Globally, our results demonstrate that ADS Plus offers a viable community-based solution for supporting dementia family caregivers with high implementation potential for diverse ADS settings.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02927821 (Registration Date 10/7/2016).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
期刊最新文献
Associations of dynapenic abdominal obesity and its components with cognitive impairment among hemodialysis patients. Correction: Do the gait domains change in PD patients with freezing of gait during their 'interictal' period? Mealtime situations in nursing homes from the residents' perspective - an integrative review. The pictorial fit-frail scale: a novel tool for frailty assessment in critically ill older adults. Thyroid hormones and frailty in older adults: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1