Understanding the implementation process of the Adult Day Services Plus program.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY BMC Geriatrics Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1186/s12877-025-05757-4
Quinton D Cotton, Dionne Bailey, Elle Albers, Steph Ingvalson, Emily Bloomquist, Katie Marx, Keith Anderson, Holly Dabelko-Schoeny, Lauren Parker, Laura N Gitlin, Joseph E Gaugler
{"title":"Understanding the implementation process of the Adult Day Services Plus program.","authors":"Quinton D Cotton, Dionne Bailey, Elle Albers, Steph Ingvalson, Emily Bloomquist, Katie Marx, Keith Anderson, Holly Dabelko-Schoeny, Lauren Parker, Laura N Gitlin, Joseph E Gaugler","doi":"10.1186/s12877-025-05757-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Among the available evidence-based interventions targeting dementia family caregivers, there is limited evidence on implementation processes that produce desired outcomes (i.e., reductions in depression and burden) for caregivers, people living with dementia (PLWD), and community-based programs themselves. In a national multi-site hybrid effectiveness trial, we investigated the implementation success and challenges of embedding an evidence-based intervention (ADS Plus) targeting dementia family caregivers whose PLWD was enrolled in an adult day service (ADS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we conducted a directed qualitative content analysis to understand caregiver (n = 15) and staff (n = 14) perceptions of facilitators of and potential barriers to implementation of ADS Plus in nine ADS programs to guide future dissemination efforts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results demonstrated that successful delivery of ADS Plus was achieved through intervention adaptability, personalization, and structure (innovation); responsiveness of ADS Plus to external changes and intervention marketability (outer domain); presence of aligned goals and familiarity (inner setting); involvement of research staff, connections among practitioners, and meeting caregiver needs (individual domain); and understanding caregivers' needs and addressing staff capacity to take action (implementation process). This adaptability reassures us of the potential to implement ADS Plus in heterogeneous programmatic settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Globally, our results demonstrate that ADS Plus offers a viable community-based solution for supporting dementia family caregivers with high implementation potential for diverse ADS settings.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02927821 (Registration Date 10/7/2016).</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":"25 1","pages":"95"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11823245/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-05757-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Among the available evidence-based interventions targeting dementia family caregivers, there is limited evidence on implementation processes that produce desired outcomes (i.e., reductions in depression and burden) for caregivers, people living with dementia (PLWD), and community-based programs themselves. In a national multi-site hybrid effectiveness trial, we investigated the implementation success and challenges of embedding an evidence-based intervention (ADS Plus) targeting dementia family caregivers whose PLWD was enrolled in an adult day service (ADS).

Methods: Informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we conducted a directed qualitative content analysis to understand caregiver (n = 15) and staff (n = 14) perceptions of facilitators of and potential barriers to implementation of ADS Plus in nine ADS programs to guide future dissemination efforts.

Results: Results demonstrated that successful delivery of ADS Plus was achieved through intervention adaptability, personalization, and structure (innovation); responsiveness of ADS Plus to external changes and intervention marketability (outer domain); presence of aligned goals and familiarity (inner setting); involvement of research staff, connections among practitioners, and meeting caregiver needs (individual domain); and understanding caregivers' needs and addressing staff capacity to take action (implementation process). This adaptability reassures us of the potential to implement ADS Plus in heterogeneous programmatic settings.

Conclusion: Globally, our results demonstrate that ADS Plus offers a viable community-based solution for supporting dementia family caregivers with high implementation potential for diverse ADS settings.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02927821 (Registration Date 10/7/2016).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解成人日间服务附加计划的实施过程。
背景:在针对痴呆症家庭照护者的现有循证干预措施中,对照护者、痴呆症患者(PLWD)和社区项目本身产生预期结果(即减少抑郁和负担)的实施过程证据有限。在一项全国性多地点混合有效性试验中,我们调查了针对痴呆家庭照顾者的基于证据的干预(ADS Plus)的实施成功和挑战,这些痴呆症家庭照顾者的PLWD参加了成人日间服务(ADS)。方法:在实施研究统一框架的指导下,我们进行了一项直接定性内容分析,以了解护理人员(n = 15)和工作人员(n = 14)对9个ADS项目中实施ADS Plus的促进者和潜在障碍的看法,以指导未来的传播工作。结果:结果表明,通过干预适应性、个性化和结构(创新)实现了ADS Plus的成功交付;ADS Plus对外部变化的响应性和干预的市场化(外部领域);存在一致的目标和熟悉度(内部设置);研究人员的参与,从业人员之间的联系,满足护理人员的需求(个人领域);了解照顾者的需求并解决工作人员采取行动的能力问题(实施过程)。这种适应性保证了我们在异构编程设置中实现ADS Plus的潜力。结论:在全球范围内,我们的研究结果表明,ADS Plus为支持痴呆症家庭护理人员提供了一种可行的社区解决方案,在不同的ADS环境中具有很高的实施潜力。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02927821(注册日期10/7/2016)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
期刊最新文献
Anticoagulant adherence and associated complications and readmissions in older valve surgery adults: insights from a retrospective cohort study. Development and validation of an osteoporosis risk-assessment model for Chinese older adults: a large-scale retrospective study. Life satisfaction in later life: the role of health, social support, and social exclusion in Türkiye. Assessment of fall risk in the home environment of Korean older adults: revision and validation of the K-HOME FAST. Association between cumulative TyG/AIP-derived indices and terminal survival time in older patients with circulatory system diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1