Fatigue in living kidney donors compared to a German general population sample: an exploratory study.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Frontiers in Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-01-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1510738
Dilek Akkus, Adrian Westenberger, Gunilla Einecke, Wilfried Gwinner, Uwe Tegtbur, Mariel Nöhre, Martina de Zwaan
{"title":"Fatigue in living kidney donors compared to a German general population sample: an exploratory study.","authors":"Dilek Akkus, Adrian Westenberger, Gunilla Einecke, Wilfried Gwinner, Uwe Tegtbur, Mariel Nöhre, Martina de Zwaan","doi":"10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1510738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical studies have not conclusively clarified whether fatigue scores in living kidney donors after donation are fundamentally different from general population samples. Moreover, the association between sociodemographic and donor specific factors and fatigue in donors is not well understood.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Fatigue scores of 358 living kidney donors on average 7.67 years post-donation were compared with 1896 subjects from the German general population in five strata of age and sex. Fatigue was measured with the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20). Relationships between the five MFI-20 subscales and the sociodemographic variables sex, age, education, and in the donor sample also years since donation were calculated. Additionally, the association between donor specific variables and fatigue levels were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, donors had lower fatigue scores than the population sample. Particularly the age group 65-74 and above reported significantly lower fatigue scores. A significant exception was found in women aged 45-54 years, where donors showed significant higher general fatigue scores than the corresponding subgroup of the general population sample. Multiple regression analyses in the general population sample revealed associations between female sex and higher age with higher values in most MFI-20 subscales, whereas subjects with higher education showed mostly lower fatigue scores. In the donor group, these associations were of little importance. Also, years since donation, partnership, and recipient group were not strongly related to fatigue. However, higher fatigue in donors was associated with more donation regret, a more negative relationship with the recipient, a more negatively perceived recipient health, less perceived family support, and more financial burden.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fatigue is less prevalent particularly in older donors and predictors of fatigue presented in the general population sample seem to have little importance in the donors. However, middle-aged female donors might be more prone to develop fatigue. This group may require more intense exploration before and after donation to detect and treat the underlying factors timely.</p>","PeriodicalId":12605,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","volume":"15 ","pages":"1510738"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11821954/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1510738","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical studies have not conclusively clarified whether fatigue scores in living kidney donors after donation are fundamentally different from general population samples. Moreover, the association between sociodemographic and donor specific factors and fatigue in donors is not well understood.

Patients and methods: Fatigue scores of 358 living kidney donors on average 7.67 years post-donation were compared with 1896 subjects from the German general population in five strata of age and sex. Fatigue was measured with the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20). Relationships between the five MFI-20 subscales and the sociodemographic variables sex, age, education, and in the donor sample also years since donation were calculated. Additionally, the association between donor specific variables and fatigue levels were analyzed.

Results: Overall, donors had lower fatigue scores than the population sample. Particularly the age group 65-74 and above reported significantly lower fatigue scores. A significant exception was found in women aged 45-54 years, where donors showed significant higher general fatigue scores than the corresponding subgroup of the general population sample. Multiple regression analyses in the general population sample revealed associations between female sex and higher age with higher values in most MFI-20 subscales, whereas subjects with higher education showed mostly lower fatigue scores. In the donor group, these associations were of little importance. Also, years since donation, partnership, and recipient group were not strongly related to fatigue. However, higher fatigue in donors was associated with more donation regret, a more negative relationship with the recipient, a more negatively perceived recipient health, less perceived family support, and more financial burden.

Conclusion: Fatigue is less prevalent particularly in older donors and predictors of fatigue presented in the general population sample seem to have little importance in the donors. However, middle-aged female donors might be more prone to develop fatigue. This group may require more intense exploration before and after donation to detect and treat the underlying factors timely.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与德国普通人群样本相比,活体肾供者的疲劳:一项探索性研究。
背景:临床研究尚未明确活体肾供者捐献后的疲劳评分是否与一般人群样本有根本不同。此外,社会人口学和捐助者特定因素与捐助者疲劳之间的关系尚不清楚。患者和方法:将358名活体肾脏捐赠者的疲劳评分与1896名来自德国普通人群的受试者进行比较,这些受试者平均在捐赠后7.67年,分为五个年龄和性别阶层。疲劳测量采用多维疲劳量表(MFI-20)。计算了5个MFI-20分量表与社会人口学变量的关系,包括性别、年龄、教育程度,以及捐赠样本中捐赠后的年份。此外,还分析了供体特定变量与疲劳水平之间的关系。结果:总体而言,供体的疲劳评分低于总体样本。尤其是65-74岁及以上的年龄组,疲劳评分明显较低。在45-54岁的女性中发现了一个明显的例外,供体的总体疲劳评分明显高于一般人群样本的相应亚组。对一般人群样本的多元回归分析显示,女性性别和年龄越高,大多数MFI-20分量表的值越高,而受教育程度越高的受试者的疲劳得分大多越低。在供体组中,这些关联并不重要。此外,捐赠时间、合作伙伴关系和受赠群体与疲劳没有强烈的关系。然而,捐献者的疲劳程度越高,则与更多的捐赠后悔、与接受者的消极关系、对接受者健康的消极感知、对家庭支持的消极感知以及更多的经济负担相关。结论:疲劳不太普遍,特别是在老年献血者中,而在一般人群样本中呈现的疲劳预测指标在献血者中似乎不太重要。然而,中年女性捐献者可能更容易出现疲劳。这一群体可能需要在捐献前后进行更深入的探查,以便及时发现和治疗潜在因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Frontiers in Psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.50%
发文量
2813
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychiatry publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research across a wide spectrum of translational, basic and clinical research. Field Chief Editor Stefan Borgwardt at the University of Basel is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal''s mission is to use translational approaches to improve therapeutic options for mental illness and consequently to improve patient treatment outcomes.
期刊最新文献
Differences in brain functioning between obsessive-compulsive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder: a clinical study using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Therapeutic exercise is associated with dose-dependent reductions in acute anxiety across psychiatric diagnoses. Treatment continuation and factors associated with discontinuation with 3-month paliperidone palmitate in patients with schizophrenia: a post hoc analysis of post-marketing surveillance data in Japan. Whose voice is heard? Mental health professionals' involvement, epistemic injustice, and the ethics of psychiatric advance directives. Artificial intelligence support for diagnosis of neurodevelopmental disorders during childhood: an umbrella review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1