Huarong Yang, Haiyan Xing, Xue Zou, Meihua Jin, Yang Li, Ke Xiao, Li Cai, Yao Liu, Xue Yang
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of intensive blood pressure control in patients over 60 years: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Huarong Yang, Haiyan Xing, Xue Zou, Meihua Jin, Yang Li, Ke Xiao, Li Cai, Yao Liu, Xue Yang","doi":"10.1080/10641963.2025.2465399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intensive blood pressure control in patients over 60 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Databases including PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library were searched from inception through February 1, 2024. Randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy or safety of intensive blood pressure control in patients over 60 years were included in the meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intensive blood pressure control in individuals with mild hypertension has been shown to reduce the risk of heart failure, stroke, myocardial infarction, major cardiovascular events, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality. The benefits of intensive blood pressure control in patients with moderate to severe hypertension are comparable to those observed in individuals with mild hypertension, with the exception of a reduced impact on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality. Compared with maintaining systolic blood pressure (SBP) above 140 mmHg, SBP below 140 mmHg is associated with a decreased risk of major cardiovascular events in patients aged over 70, as well as a reduced risk of stroke in patients aged 60-69. Furthermore, compared to maintaining SBP above 130 mmHg, SBP below 130 mmHg is linked to a lower risk of major cardiovascular events, heart failure and myocardial infarction in patients over 60, a reduced risk of stroke and cardiovascular mortality in patients aged 60-69, and a decreased risk of all-cause mortality in patients over 70. However, a lower baseline blood pressure or more aggressive blood pressure control may be associated with an increased risk of hypotension.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with hypertension aged over 60 years can derive benefits from intensive blood pressure management without experiencing significant adverse events, aside from hypotension.</p>","PeriodicalId":10333,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Hypertension","volume":"47 1","pages":"2465399"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10641963.2025.2465399","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intensive blood pressure control in patients over 60 years.
Methods: Databases including PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library were searched from inception through February 1, 2024. Randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy or safety of intensive blood pressure control in patients over 60 years were included in the meta-analysis.
Results: Intensive blood pressure control in individuals with mild hypertension has been shown to reduce the risk of heart failure, stroke, myocardial infarction, major cardiovascular events, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality. The benefits of intensive blood pressure control in patients with moderate to severe hypertension are comparable to those observed in individuals with mild hypertension, with the exception of a reduced impact on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality. Compared with maintaining systolic blood pressure (SBP) above 140 mmHg, SBP below 140 mmHg is associated with a decreased risk of major cardiovascular events in patients aged over 70, as well as a reduced risk of stroke in patients aged 60-69. Furthermore, compared to maintaining SBP above 130 mmHg, SBP below 130 mmHg is linked to a lower risk of major cardiovascular events, heart failure and myocardial infarction in patients over 60, a reduced risk of stroke and cardiovascular mortality in patients aged 60-69, and a decreased risk of all-cause mortality in patients over 70. However, a lower baseline blood pressure or more aggressive blood pressure control may be associated with an increased risk of hypotension.
Conclusions: Patients with hypertension aged over 60 years can derive benefits from intensive blood pressure management without experiencing significant adverse events, aside from hypotension.
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Experimental Hypertension is a reputable journal that has converted to a full Open Access format starting from Volume 45 in 2023. While previous volumes are still accessible through a Pay to Read model, the journal now provides free and open access to its content. It serves as an international platform for the exchange of up-to-date scientific and clinical information concerning both human and animal hypertension. The journal publishes a wide range of articles, including full research papers, solicited and unsolicited reviews, and commentaries. Through these publications, the journal aims to enhance current understanding and support the timely detection, management, control, and prevention of hypertension-related conditions.
One notable aspect of Clinical and Experimental Hypertension is its coverage of special issues that focus on the proceedings of symposia dedicated to hypertension research. This feature allows researchers and clinicians to delve deeper into the latest advancements in this field.
The journal is abstracted and indexed in several renowned databases, including Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes News (Online), Reactions Weekly (Online), CABI, EBSCOhost, Elsevier BV, International Atomic Energy Agency, and the National Library of Medicine, among others. These affiliations ensure that the journal's content receives broad visibility and facilitates its discoverability by professionals and researchers in related disciplines.