Parsing the heterogeneity of depression: a data-driven subgroup derived from cognitive function.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Frontiers in Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-01-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1537331
Chenyang Xu, Yanbao Tao, Yunhan Lin, Jiahui Zhu, Zhuoran Li, Jiayi Li, Mingqia Wang, Tao Huang, Chuan Shi
{"title":"Parsing the heterogeneity of depression: a data-driven subgroup derived from cognitive function.","authors":"Chenyang Xu, Yanbao Tao, Yunhan Lin, Jiahui Zhu, Zhuoran Li, Jiayi Li, Mingqia Wang, Tao Huang, Chuan Shi","doi":"10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1537331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Increasing evidences suggests that depression is a heterogeneous clinical syndrome. Cognitive deficits in depression are associated with poor psychosocial functioning and worse response to conventional antidepressants. However, a consistent profile of neurocognitive abnormalities in depression remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We used data-driven parsing of cognitive performance to reveal subgroups present across depressed individuals and then investigate the change pattern of cognitive subgroups across the course in follow-up.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We assessed cognition in 163 patients with depression using The Chinese Brief Cognitive Test(C-BCT) and the scores were compared with those of 196 healthy controls (HCs). 58 patients were reassessed after 8 weeks. We used K-means cluster analysis to identify cognitive subgroups, and compared clinical variables among these subgroups. A linear mixed-effects model, incorporating time and group (with interaction term: time × group) as fixed effects, was used to assess cognitive changes over time. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify risk factors associated with these subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two distinct neurocognitive subgroups were identified: (1) a cognitive-impaired subgroup with global impairment across all domains assessed by the C-BCT, and (2) a cognitive-preserved subgroup, exhibited intact cognitive function, with performance well within the healthy range. The cognitive-impaired subgroup presented with more severe baseline symptoms, including depressed mood, guilt, suicidality, and poorer work performance. Significant group × time interactions were observed in the Trail Making Test Part A (TMT-A) and Continuous Performance Test (CPT), but not in Symbol Coding or Digit Span tests. Despite partial improvement in TMT-A and CPT tests, the cognitive-impaired subgroup's scores remained lower than those of the cognitive-preserved subgroup across all tests at the study endpoint. Multiple regression analysis indicated that longer illness duration, lower educational levels, and antipsychotic medication use may be risk factors for cognitive impairment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identifies distinguishable cognitive subgroups in acute depression, thereby confirming the presence of cognitive heterogeneity. The cognitive-impaired subgroup exhibits distinct symptoms and persistent cognitive deficits even after treatment. Screening for cognitive dysfunction may facilitate more targeted interventions.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>https://www.chictr.org, identifier ChiCTR2400092796.</p>","PeriodicalId":12605,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","volume":"16 ","pages":"1537331"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11821656/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1537331","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Increasing evidences suggests that depression is a heterogeneous clinical syndrome. Cognitive deficits in depression are associated with poor psychosocial functioning and worse response to conventional antidepressants. However, a consistent profile of neurocognitive abnormalities in depression remains unclear.

Objective: We used data-driven parsing of cognitive performance to reveal subgroups present across depressed individuals and then investigate the change pattern of cognitive subgroups across the course in follow-up.

Method: We assessed cognition in 163 patients with depression using The Chinese Brief Cognitive Test(C-BCT) and the scores were compared with those of 196 healthy controls (HCs). 58 patients were reassessed after 8 weeks. We used K-means cluster analysis to identify cognitive subgroups, and compared clinical variables among these subgroups. A linear mixed-effects model, incorporating time and group (with interaction term: time × group) as fixed effects, was used to assess cognitive changes over time. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify risk factors associated with these subgroups.

Results: Two distinct neurocognitive subgroups were identified: (1) a cognitive-impaired subgroup with global impairment across all domains assessed by the C-BCT, and (2) a cognitive-preserved subgroup, exhibited intact cognitive function, with performance well within the healthy range. The cognitive-impaired subgroup presented with more severe baseline symptoms, including depressed mood, guilt, suicidality, and poorer work performance. Significant group × time interactions were observed in the Trail Making Test Part A (TMT-A) and Continuous Performance Test (CPT), but not in Symbol Coding or Digit Span tests. Despite partial improvement in TMT-A and CPT tests, the cognitive-impaired subgroup's scores remained lower than those of the cognitive-preserved subgroup across all tests at the study endpoint. Multiple regression analysis indicated that longer illness duration, lower educational levels, and antipsychotic medication use may be risk factors for cognitive impairment.

Conclusion: This study identifies distinguishable cognitive subgroups in acute depression, thereby confirming the presence of cognitive heterogeneity. The cognitive-impaired subgroup exhibits distinct symptoms and persistent cognitive deficits even after treatment. Screening for cognitive dysfunction may facilitate more targeted interventions.

Clinical trial registration: https://www.chictr.org, identifier ChiCTR2400092796.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解析抑郁症的异质性:来自认知功能的数据驱动亚组。
背景:越来越多的证据表明抑郁症是一种异质性临床综合征。抑郁症的认知缺陷与不良的社会心理功能和对常规抗抑郁药物的不良反应有关。然而,抑郁症中神经认知异常的一致概况仍不清楚。目的:采用数据驱动的认知表现分析方法,揭示抑郁个体认知表现的亚群,并在随访中探讨认知亚群在整个过程中的变化规律。方法:采用中文简易认知测验(C-BCT)对163例抑郁症患者进行认知功能评估,并与196名健康对照进行比较。58例患者在8周后重新评估。我们使用k均值聚类分析来确定认知亚组,并比较这些亚组之间的临床变量。采用线性混合效应模型,将时间和群体(相互作用项:时间×群体)作为固定效应,评估认知随时间的变化。采用逐步logistic回归分析确定与这些亚组相关的危险因素。结果:确定了两个不同的神经认知亚组:(1)C-BCT评估的认知受损亚组在所有领域都有整体损伤;(2)认知保留亚组,表现出完整的认知功能,表现良好,在健康范围内。认知障碍亚组表现出更严重的基线症状,包括情绪抑郁、内疚、自杀倾向和工作表现较差。在做迹测试A部分(TMT-A)和连续表现测试(CPT)中观察到显著的组×时间交互作用,但在符号编码和数字广度测试中没有观察到显著的组×时间交互作用。尽管TMT-A和CPT测试有部分改善,但在研究终点的所有测试中,认知受损亚组的得分仍低于认知保持亚组。多元回归分析显示,病程长、受教育程度低、使用抗精神病药物可能是认知障碍的危险因素。结论:本研究确定了急性抑郁症中可区分的认知亚群,从而证实了认知异质性的存在。认知受损亚组表现出明显的症状和持续的认知缺陷,即使在治疗后。对认知功能障碍的筛查可能有助于更有针对性的干预。临床试验注册:https://www.chictr.org,标识符ChiCTR2400092796。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Frontiers in Psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.50%
发文量
2813
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychiatry publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research across a wide spectrum of translational, basic and clinical research. Field Chief Editor Stefan Borgwardt at the University of Basel is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal''s mission is to use translational approaches to improve therapeutic options for mental illness and consequently to improve patient treatment outcomes.
期刊最新文献
Equivalent efficacy of left versus right hemisphere accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation for major depressive disorder. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity and neurotrophic factors in drug-naive children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Family perspectives on independent living for adults with cerebral palsy: barriers, support needs, and quality of life. Encephalitis-like presentation of methylmalonic acidemia with homocystinuria in a postpartum woman: a case report. Longitudinal trends in blood concentrations of clozapine and norclozapine, inflammatory markers, and clinical outcomes in Japanese patients: a 12-week prospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1