Comparative Outcomes of Arteriovenous Malformations treatment in Eloquent versus Non-Eloquent Brain: A Multicenter Study with Propensity-Score Weighting.
Basel Musmar, Nimer Adeeb, Hammam Abdalrazeq, Hamza A Salim, Joanna M Roy, Assala Aslan, Stavropoula I Tjoumakaris, Christopher Ogilvy, Mustafa K Baskaya, Douglas Kondziolka, Jason Sheehan, Howard Riina, Sandeep Kandregula, Adam Dmytriw, Abdallah Abushehab, Kareem El Naamani, Ahmed Abdelsalam, Natasha Ironside, Deepak Kumbhare, Sanjeev Gummadi, Cagdas Ataoglu, Muhammed Amir Essibayi, Abdullah Keles, Sandeep Muram, Daniel Sconzo, Arwin Rezai, Omar Alwakaa, Salem M Tos, Georgios Mantziaris, Min S Park, Sahin Hanalioglu, Ufuk Erginoglu, Johannes Pöppe, Rajeev D Sen, Christoph Griessenaur, Jan-Karl Burkhardt, Robert M Starke, Laligam N Sekhar, Michael R Levitt, David Altschul, Neil Haranhalli, Malia McAvoy, Hussein A Zeineddine, Adib A Abla, Elias Atallah, Michael Reid Gooch, Robert H Rosenwasser, Christopher J Stapleton, Matthew Koch, Visish M Srinivasan, Peng Roc Chen, Spiros Blackburn, Ketan Bulsara, Louis J Kim, Omar Choudhri, Bryan Pukenas, Edward Smith, Pascal J Mosimann, Ali Alaraj, Mohammad Ali Aziz-Sultan, Aman B Patel, Amey Rajan Savardekar, Christina Notarianni, Hugo Cuellar, Michael T Lawton, Bharat Guthikonda, Jacques Morcos, Pascal Jabbour
{"title":"Comparative Outcomes of Arteriovenous Malformations treatment in Eloquent versus Non-Eloquent Brain: A Multicenter Study with Propensity-Score Weighting.","authors":"Basel Musmar, Nimer Adeeb, Hammam Abdalrazeq, Hamza A Salim, Joanna M Roy, Assala Aslan, Stavropoula I Tjoumakaris, Christopher Ogilvy, Mustafa K Baskaya, Douglas Kondziolka, Jason Sheehan, Howard Riina, Sandeep Kandregula, Adam Dmytriw, Abdallah Abushehab, Kareem El Naamani, Ahmed Abdelsalam, Natasha Ironside, Deepak Kumbhare, Sanjeev Gummadi, Cagdas Ataoglu, Muhammed Amir Essibayi, Abdullah Keles, Sandeep Muram, Daniel Sconzo, Arwin Rezai, Omar Alwakaa, Salem M Tos, Georgios Mantziaris, Min S Park, Sahin Hanalioglu, Ufuk Erginoglu, Johannes Pöppe, Rajeev D Sen, Christoph Griessenaur, Jan-Karl Burkhardt, Robert M Starke, Laligam N Sekhar, Michael R Levitt, David Altschul, Neil Haranhalli, Malia McAvoy, Hussein A Zeineddine, Adib A Abla, Elias Atallah, Michael Reid Gooch, Robert H Rosenwasser, Christopher J Stapleton, Matthew Koch, Visish M Srinivasan, Peng Roc Chen, Spiros Blackburn, Ketan Bulsara, Louis J Kim, Omar Choudhri, Bryan Pukenas, Edward Smith, Pascal J Mosimann, Ali Alaraj, Mohammad Ali Aziz-Sultan, Aman B Patel, Amey Rajan Savardekar, Christina Notarianni, Hugo Cuellar, Michael T Lawton, Bharat Guthikonda, Jacques Morcos, Pascal Jabbour","doi":"10.1177/17474930251323503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are complex vascular anomalies with a high risk of hemorrhage and neurological deficits, especially when located in eloquent brain regions. The eloquence of an AVM location is a critical factor in the treatment planning, influencing both the risk of complications and long-term functional outcomes. This study aims to compare outcomes between eloquent and non-eloquent AVMs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, retrospective study utilized data from the Multicenter International Study for Treatment of Brain AVMs (MISTA) consortium. Patients with eloquent and non-eloquent AVMs were compared on baseline characteristics, angiographic outcomes, and functional outcomes using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Propensity score weighting (IPTW) was applied to adjust for confounding variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 1,013 patients, with 498 (49.2%) AVMs located in eloquent regions and 515 (50.8%) in non-eloquent regions. In unadjusted analysis, eloquent AVMs had lower complete obliteration rates (67.6% vs. 79.5%, OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.39-0.72, p < 0.001) and higher complication rates (24.5% vs. 19.0%, OR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.02-1.86, p = 0.03) compared to non-eloquent AVMs. After IPTW adjustment, eloquent AVMs continued to show significantly higher odds of overall complications (OR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.12-2.52, p = 0.01) and symptomatic complications (OR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.12-2.80, p = 0.01). Secondary analysis within the eloquent group indicated that embolization was linked to an elevated risk of complications. Surgery and radiosurgery showed comparable functional outcomes at last follow-up and complications rates with higher complete obliteration rates in surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AVMs in eloquent brain areas present higher risks of complications and lower obliteration rates, emphasizing the need for cautious, individualized treatment planning. Within the eloquent group, embolization increased the risk of complications, while surgery and radiosurgery showed comparable functional outcomes at last follow-up and complication rates with higher complete obliteration rates in surgery. These findings highlight the importance of location in AVM management and support further research focusing on comparing treatment strategies for AVMs in eloquent brain areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":14442,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Stroke","volume":" ","pages":"17474930251323503"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930251323503","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are complex vascular anomalies with a high risk of hemorrhage and neurological deficits, especially when located in eloquent brain regions. The eloquence of an AVM location is a critical factor in the treatment planning, influencing both the risk of complications and long-term functional outcomes. This study aims to compare outcomes between eloquent and non-eloquent AVMs.
Methods: This multicenter, retrospective study utilized data from the Multicenter International Study for Treatment of Brain AVMs (MISTA) consortium. Patients with eloquent and non-eloquent AVMs were compared on baseline characteristics, angiographic outcomes, and functional outcomes using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Propensity score weighting (IPTW) was applied to adjust for confounding variables.
Results: The study included 1,013 patients, with 498 (49.2%) AVMs located in eloquent regions and 515 (50.8%) in non-eloquent regions. In unadjusted analysis, eloquent AVMs had lower complete obliteration rates (67.6% vs. 79.5%, OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.39-0.72, p < 0.001) and higher complication rates (24.5% vs. 19.0%, OR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.02-1.86, p = 0.03) compared to non-eloquent AVMs. After IPTW adjustment, eloquent AVMs continued to show significantly higher odds of overall complications (OR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.12-2.52, p = 0.01) and symptomatic complications (OR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.12-2.80, p = 0.01). Secondary analysis within the eloquent group indicated that embolization was linked to an elevated risk of complications. Surgery and radiosurgery showed comparable functional outcomes at last follow-up and complications rates with higher complete obliteration rates in surgery.
Conclusion: AVMs in eloquent brain areas present higher risks of complications and lower obliteration rates, emphasizing the need for cautious, individualized treatment planning. Within the eloquent group, embolization increased the risk of complications, while surgery and radiosurgery showed comparable functional outcomes at last follow-up and complication rates with higher complete obliteration rates in surgery. These findings highlight the importance of location in AVM management and support further research focusing on comparing treatment strategies for AVMs in eloquent brain areas.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Stroke is a welcome addition to the international stroke journal landscape in that it concentrates on the clinical aspects of stroke with basic science contributions in areas of clinical interest. Reviews of current topics are broadly based to encompass not only recent advances of global interest but also those which may be more important in certain regions and the journal regularly features items of news interest from all parts of the world. To facilitate the international nature of the journal, our Associate Editors from Europe, Asia, North America and South America coordinate segments of the journal.