The Use of BODY-Q to Assess Factors Impacting Satisfaction and Quality-of-life Postabdominoplasty in Kenya.

IF 1.8 Q3 SURGERY Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open Pub Date : 2025-02-12 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000006539
Sarah Nyakiongora, Matteo Laspro, Oluchukwu Dele-Oni, Adan A Abdullahi, Ferdinand W Nangole, Andrea L Pusic
{"title":"The Use of BODY-Q to Assess Factors Impacting Satisfaction and Quality-of-life Postabdominoplasty in Kenya.","authors":"Sarah Nyakiongora, Matteo Laspro, Oluchukwu Dele-Oni, Adan A Abdullahi, Ferdinand W Nangole, Andrea L Pusic","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Massive weight loss can often lead to skin redundancy and affect a patient's quality of life. Abdominoplasty has grown in popularity due to its cosmetic and functional effects. There is currently a paucity in the patient-reported outcome measures literature in low-resource areas. As such, this study aimed to apply the BODY-Q measure to evaluate factors impacting abdominoplasty outcomes in Kenya.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing abdominoplasty were asked to complete BODY-Q scales before and after surgery. Patient demographics, medical history, and postoperative care were retrospectively collected from patient records. Inference statistics were used to assess predictors of improvement in postsurgical BODY-Q scores and seroma formation. Student <i>t</i> tests were used to compare means; chi-square tests were used to assess differences between proportions, and <i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> was used to determine the proportion of variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-nine patients underwent abdominoplasty, of whom 38 answered both surveys. Mean age and body mass index (BMI) were 38.30 (±6.35) years and 30.80 (±6.35) kg/m<sup>2</sup>, respectively. The difference in pre- and postoperative BODY-Q scores was -73.5, with an effect size of -6.67 and a minimal clinically important difference of -2.00. Positive predictors of BODY-Q score improvement were concurrent liposuction (<i>P</i> = 0.004), preoperative BMI (<i>P</i> = 0.001), and patient-rated scar quality (<i>P</i> = 0.003). Other factors were not significantly predictive.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Kenyan patients seem to be highly satisfied with abdominoplasty procedures, which result in significant improvements in quality of life. Factors significantly associated with higher satisfaction include concurrent liposuction, higher preoperative BMI, and postoperative scar quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 2","pages":"e6539"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11822338/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Massive weight loss can often lead to skin redundancy and affect a patient's quality of life. Abdominoplasty has grown in popularity due to its cosmetic and functional effects. There is currently a paucity in the patient-reported outcome measures literature in low-resource areas. As such, this study aimed to apply the BODY-Q measure to evaluate factors impacting abdominoplasty outcomes in Kenya.

Methods: Patients undergoing abdominoplasty were asked to complete BODY-Q scales before and after surgery. Patient demographics, medical history, and postoperative care were retrospectively collected from patient records. Inference statistics were used to assess predictors of improvement in postsurgical BODY-Q scores and seroma formation. Student t tests were used to compare means; chi-square tests were used to assess differences between proportions, and R 2 was used to determine the proportion of variance.

Results: Thirty-nine patients underwent abdominoplasty, of whom 38 answered both surveys. Mean age and body mass index (BMI) were 38.30 (±6.35) years and 30.80 (±6.35) kg/m2, respectively. The difference in pre- and postoperative BODY-Q scores was -73.5, with an effect size of -6.67 and a minimal clinically important difference of -2.00. Positive predictors of BODY-Q score improvement were concurrent liposuction (P = 0.004), preoperative BMI (P = 0.001), and patient-rated scar quality (P = 0.003). Other factors were not significantly predictive.

Conclusions: Kenyan patients seem to be highly satisfied with abdominoplasty procedures, which result in significant improvements in quality of life. Factors significantly associated with higher satisfaction include concurrent liposuction, higher preoperative BMI, and postoperative scar quality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用BODY-Q评估肯尼亚腹部成形术后满意度和生活质量的影响因素
背景:大量的体重减轻往往会导致皮肤冗余,影响患者的生活质量。由于其美容和功能效果,腹部成形术越来越受欢迎。在低资源地区,目前缺乏患者报告的结果测量文献。因此,本研究旨在应用BODY-Q测量来评估影响肯尼亚腹部成形术结果的因素。方法:对腹部成形术患者术前、术后进行BODY-Q量表测试。从患者记录中回顾性收集患者人口统计、病史和术后护理。推断统计用于评估术后BODY-Q评分和血肿形成改善的预测因素。采用学生t检验比较均数;采用卡方检验评估各比例之间的差异,采用r2确定方差的比例。结果:39例患者接受了腹部成形术,其中38例同时回答了两项调查。平均年龄38.30(±6.35)岁,体重指数(BMI) 30.80(±6.35)kg/m2。术前和术后BODY-Q评分的差异为-73.5,效应值为-6.67,最小的临床重要差异为-2.00。BODY-Q评分改善的阳性预测因子为同时吸脂(P = 0.004)、术前BMI (P = 0.001)和患者评价的疤痕质量(P = 0.003)。其他因素没有显著的预测性。结论:肯尼亚患者似乎对腹部成形术非常满意,生活质量显著提高。与高满意度显著相关的因素包括同时抽脂、术前较高的BMI和术后疤痕质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
1584
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.
期刊最新文献
Temporoparietal Fascial Free Flap With Vascularized Helical Rim Component for Complex Nasal Reconstruction. Use of Pedicled Anterolateral Thigh Flap in Revascularized Profunda Femoris Artery Following Long-term Occlusion. The Therapeutic Benefit of Allopurinol in the Treatment of Foreign Body Granulomas Caused by Polymethylmethacrylate Microspheres. Absence of Latissimus Dorsi Muscle in Delayed Breast Reconstruction: Conversion to a Thoracodorsal Artery Perforator Flap. The Bold Surgeon Syndrome: Contemporary Analysis of Overconfidence, Training Gaps, and Patient Safety in Plastic Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1