Comparison of Intense Pulsed Light With Nonablative Fractional Laser and Picosecond Alexandrite Laser With Diffractive Lens Array for Noninvasive Facial Rejuvenation

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY Lasers in Surgery and Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1002/lsm.23879
Jiafang Zhu, Rui Chang, Yue Han, Qianwen Xi, Shutian Jiang, Ying Shang, Dongze Lyu, Wenxin Yu, Xiaoxi Lin
{"title":"Comparison of Intense Pulsed Light With Nonablative Fractional Laser and Picosecond Alexandrite Laser With Diffractive Lens Array for Noninvasive Facial Rejuvenation","authors":"Jiafang Zhu,&nbsp;Rui Chang,&nbsp;Yue Han,&nbsp;Qianwen Xi,&nbsp;Shutian Jiang,&nbsp;Ying Shang,&nbsp;Dongze Lyu,&nbsp;Wenxin Yu,&nbsp;Xiaoxi Lin","doi":"10.1002/lsm.23879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Both nonablative fractional (NAFL) laser combined with intense pulsed light (IPL) and picosecond alexandrite laser (PSAL) with diffractive lens array (DLA) have been documented for their efficacy in facial rejuvenation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To observe the safety and efficacy of PSAL-DLA and IPL-NAFL in the rejuvenation of Chinese individuals.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Each subject (<i>n</i> = 18) received three treatments on half of their face, with 1-month interval between treatments. One side of the face was randomly treated with PSAL-DLA, and the other side with IPL-NAFL. Quantitative data of wrinkles, pores, brown spots, and red areas were calculated using the VISIA-CR imaging system 3 months after the final treatment. Secondary outcomes included a 10-point VAS for patient-rated pain sensation, incidence of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH), erythema and edema, and overall satisfaction. Adverse events were recorded after each treatment and at each follow-up.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 17 Chinese female patients aged 28.2 ± 4.3 years completed the study and the 3-month follow-up. The IPL-NAFL side showed a statistically significant improvement in pores compared to baseline (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05); the PSAL-DLA side showed a statistically significant improvement in brown spots compared to baseline (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Compared to PSAL-DLA, the improvement in enlarged pores was better for IPL-NAFL (81.8 ± 128.1 vs. 20.8 ± 132.4, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). In terms of pain, IPL-NAFL was more painful than PSAL-DLA (6 ± 1 vs. 4 ± 1, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), a longer recovery time for erythema and edema (5 ± 1 vs. 2 ± 1, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and a higher incidence of PIH (58.8% vs. 23.5%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Patient satisfaction was higher for PSAL-DLA than for IPL-NAFL (3 ± 1 vs. 4 ± 0.5, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Our study results indicated that both IPL-NAFL and PSAL-DLA could improve the photoaging, but within the same number of treatments, IPL-NAFL was slightly more effective for enlarged pores than PSAL-DLA, while PSAL-DLA was more effective for brown spots than IPL-NAFL. Patients were more satisfied with PSAL-DLA, with a shorter postoperative recovery period and a lower incidence of PIH.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17961,"journal":{"name":"Lasers in Surgery and Medicine","volume":"57 2","pages":"195-203"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lasers in Surgery and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lsm.23879","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Both nonablative fractional (NAFL) laser combined with intense pulsed light (IPL) and picosecond alexandrite laser (PSAL) with diffractive lens array (DLA) have been documented for their efficacy in facial rejuvenation.

Objective

To observe the safety and efficacy of PSAL-DLA and IPL-NAFL in the rejuvenation of Chinese individuals.

Methods

Each subject (n = 18) received three treatments on half of their face, with 1-month interval between treatments. One side of the face was randomly treated with PSAL-DLA, and the other side with IPL-NAFL. Quantitative data of wrinkles, pores, brown spots, and red areas were calculated using the VISIA-CR imaging system 3 months after the final treatment. Secondary outcomes included a 10-point VAS for patient-rated pain sensation, incidence of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH), erythema and edema, and overall satisfaction. Adverse events were recorded after each treatment and at each follow-up.

Results

A total of 17 Chinese female patients aged 28.2 ± 4.3 years completed the study and the 3-month follow-up. The IPL-NAFL side showed a statistically significant improvement in pores compared to baseline (p < 0.05); the PSAL-DLA side showed a statistically significant improvement in brown spots compared to baseline (p < 0.01). Compared to PSAL-DLA, the improvement in enlarged pores was better for IPL-NAFL (81.8 ± 128.1 vs. 20.8 ± 132.4, p < 0.01). In terms of pain, IPL-NAFL was more painful than PSAL-DLA (6 ± 1 vs. 4 ± 1, p < 0.01), a longer recovery time for erythema and edema (5 ± 1 vs. 2 ± 1, p < 0.001), and a higher incidence of PIH (58.8% vs. 23.5%, p < 0.05). Patient satisfaction was higher for PSAL-DLA than for IPL-NAFL (3 ± 1 vs. 4 ± 0.5, p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Our study results indicated that both IPL-NAFL and PSAL-DLA could improve the photoaging, but within the same number of treatments, IPL-NAFL was slightly more effective for enlarged pores than PSAL-DLA, while PSAL-DLA was more effective for brown spots than IPL-NAFL. Patients were more satisfied with PSAL-DLA, with a shorter postoperative recovery period and a lower incidence of PIH.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
119
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Lasers in Surgery and Medicine publishes the highest quality research and clinical manuscripts in areas relating to the use of lasers in medicine and biology. The journal publishes basic and clinical studies on the therapeutic and diagnostic use of lasers in all the surgical and medical specialties. Contributions regarding clinical trials, new therapeutic techniques or instrumentation, laser biophysics and bioengineering, photobiology and photochemistry, outcomes research, cost-effectiveness, and other aspects of biomedicine are welcome. Using a process of rigorous yet rapid review of submitted manuscripts, findings of high scientific and medical interest are published with a minimum delay.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information The Effect of Vaginal Er:YAG Laser Therapy on Pelvic Floor Symptoms in Women With Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Single-Center Cohort Study. Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Monopolar Radiofrequency Device for Skin Tightening: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study. Comparison of Intense Pulsed Light With Nonablative Fractional Laser and Picosecond Alexandrite Laser With Diffractive Lens Array for Noninvasive Facial Rejuvenation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1