Amritha Stalin, Shamrozé Khan, Tammy Labreche, Abhishek Narayan, Lisa W T Christian, Andre Stanberry, Susan J Leat
{"title":"Development of a screening tool for reduced vision among inpatients of hospital rehabilitation units.","authors":"Amritha Stalin, Shamrozé Khan, Tammy Labreche, Abhishek Narayan, Lisa W T Christian, Andre Stanberry, Susan J Leat","doi":"10.1097/OPX.0000000000002236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Significance: </strong>This study developed a practical screening tool to identify reduced habitual vision (RHV) in hospital rehabilitation units. This tool would enhance patient care by enabling timely interventions in resource-limited settings.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The study aimed to develop a practical and implementable screening tool to identify patients with RHV in hospital rehabilitation units. Potential vision measures, screening questions, and demographic variables were considered to determine the optimum combination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cross-sectional study recruited 112 adult inpatients (aged 18+ years) from three rehabilitation units in an acute care hospital in Ontario, Canada, between October 2018 and February 2019. Data included an oral questionnaire on demographics, health status, and self-reported vision function, alongside vision assessments (distance visual acuity [VA], contrast sensitivity [CS], visual fields [VFs], and stereopsis). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify significant predictors of RHV, defined by VA >0.3 logMAR, CS <1.40 logCS, or any VF defect.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average age of participants was 74.5 years (±14.3 years), and RHV was present in 48.7%. Significant predictors of RHV included self-reported \"happiness\" with vision with current spectacles and difficulty reading a newspaper. The optimal predictive factors were VA and VF testing (96% sensitivity), but for practical implementation, the combination of three self-reported questions (happiness with vision, difficulty reading a newspaper, and difficulty distinguishing facial expressions) demonstrated 74% sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study highlights that a combination of self-reported questions can effectively identify patients with RHV, providing a feasible alternative to direct vision assessments in resource-limited settings. Implementing this screening tool could improve patient care by enabling timely adaptations and referrals for eye care, ultimately enhancing rehabilitation outcomes and reducing falls risk. Further research is needed to refine the tool's sensitivity and explore its applicability in broader hospital and primary care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19649,"journal":{"name":"Optometry and Vision Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optometry and Vision Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000002236","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Significance: This study developed a practical screening tool to identify reduced habitual vision (RHV) in hospital rehabilitation units. This tool would enhance patient care by enabling timely interventions in resource-limited settings.
Purpose: The study aimed to develop a practical and implementable screening tool to identify patients with RHV in hospital rehabilitation units. Potential vision measures, screening questions, and demographic variables were considered to determine the optimum combination.
Methods: The cross-sectional study recruited 112 adult inpatients (aged 18+ years) from three rehabilitation units in an acute care hospital in Ontario, Canada, between October 2018 and February 2019. Data included an oral questionnaire on demographics, health status, and self-reported vision function, alongside vision assessments (distance visual acuity [VA], contrast sensitivity [CS], visual fields [VFs], and stereopsis). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify significant predictors of RHV, defined by VA >0.3 logMAR, CS <1.40 logCS, or any VF defect.
Results: The average age of participants was 74.5 years (±14.3 years), and RHV was present in 48.7%. Significant predictors of RHV included self-reported "happiness" with vision with current spectacles and difficulty reading a newspaper. The optimal predictive factors were VA and VF testing (96% sensitivity), but for practical implementation, the combination of three self-reported questions (happiness with vision, difficulty reading a newspaper, and difficulty distinguishing facial expressions) demonstrated 74% sensitivity.
Conclusions: The study highlights that a combination of self-reported questions can effectively identify patients with RHV, providing a feasible alternative to direct vision assessments in resource-limited settings. Implementing this screening tool could improve patient care by enabling timely adaptations and referrals for eye care, ultimately enhancing rehabilitation outcomes and reducing falls risk. Further research is needed to refine the tool's sensitivity and explore its applicability in broader hospital and primary care settings.
期刊介绍:
Optometry and Vision Science is the monthly peer-reviewed scientific publication of the American Academy of Optometry, publishing original research since 1924. Optometry and Vision Science is an internationally recognized source for education and information on current discoveries in optometry, physiological optics, vision science, and related fields. The journal considers original contributions that advance clinical practice, vision science, and public health. Authors should remember that the journal reaches readers worldwide and their submissions should be relevant and of interest to a broad audience. Topical priorities include, but are not limited to: clinical and laboratory research, evidence-based reviews, contact lenses, ocular growth and refractive error development, eye movements, visual function and perception, biology of the eye and ocular disease, epidemiology and public health, biomedical optics and instrumentation, novel and important clinical observations and treatments, and optometric education.