Advances in Lateral Interbody Fusion and Single Position Surgery.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1227/neu.0000000000003353
Alfredo Guiroy, Alfred-John Bayaton, Michael R McDermott, Charlie Spieser, J Alex Thomas, Cristiano M Menezes, Rodrigo Amaral, Ashish Patel, Jahangir Asghar
{"title":"Advances in Lateral Interbody Fusion and Single Position Surgery.","authors":"Alfredo Guiroy, Alfred-John Bayaton, Michael R McDermott, Charlie Spieser, J Alex Thomas, Cristiano M Menezes, Rodrigo Amaral, Ashish Patel, Jahangir Asghar","doi":"10.1227/neu.0000000000003353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is traditionally performed with the patient in the lateral decubitus position for interbody implant insertion and indirect decompression. In cases requiring 360-degree fusion or direct decompression, the patient is repositioned to the prone position during surgery, a technique referred to as dual-position LLIF (DP-L). To improve efficiency and eliminate the need for repositioning, surgeons have adopted single-position approaches, completing the entire procedure either in the lateral decubitus or prone position. This explores the advancements in LLIF and single-position LLIF. Comparing both single position lateral decubitus LLIF and single position prone (P-SPS) to the traditional DP-L. A narrative review of the literature on single-position surgery (SPS) LLIF was conducted to provide an overview of its key aspects and clinical applications. The review included studies comparing SPS lateral and SPS prone to DP-L, encompassing systematic reviews, meta-analyses, retrospective studies, and case series. Additional studies deemed relevant for a thorough review were also included. No randomized controlled trials were identified or included in this review. Lateral single-position surgery and P-SPS have shown reductions in operative times and hospital length of stay compared with DP LLIF. In addition, both techniques improved estimated blood loss, complication rates, and radiographic outcomes. However, the statistical significance of these findings varied inconsistently across the published studies. The development of LLIF represents a notable advancement in spine surgery. SPS builds on this foundation, offering potential improvements over the original technique. While SPS has demonstrated certain advantages, there remains room for further refinement and optimization in its application.</p>","PeriodicalId":19276,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery","volume":"96 3S","pages":"S9-S16"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003353","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is traditionally performed with the patient in the lateral decubitus position for interbody implant insertion and indirect decompression. In cases requiring 360-degree fusion or direct decompression, the patient is repositioned to the prone position during surgery, a technique referred to as dual-position LLIF (DP-L). To improve efficiency and eliminate the need for repositioning, surgeons have adopted single-position approaches, completing the entire procedure either in the lateral decubitus or prone position. This explores the advancements in LLIF and single-position LLIF. Comparing both single position lateral decubitus LLIF and single position prone (P-SPS) to the traditional DP-L. A narrative review of the literature on single-position surgery (SPS) LLIF was conducted to provide an overview of its key aspects and clinical applications. The review included studies comparing SPS lateral and SPS prone to DP-L, encompassing systematic reviews, meta-analyses, retrospective studies, and case series. Additional studies deemed relevant for a thorough review were also included. No randomized controlled trials were identified or included in this review. Lateral single-position surgery and P-SPS have shown reductions in operative times and hospital length of stay compared with DP LLIF. In addition, both techniques improved estimated blood loss, complication rates, and radiographic outcomes. However, the statistical significance of these findings varied inconsistently across the published studies. The development of LLIF represents a notable advancement in spine surgery. SPS builds on this foundation, offering potential improvements over the original technique. While SPS has demonstrated certain advantages, there remains room for further refinement and optimization in its application.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
侧体间融合和单体位手术的研究进展。
侧位腰椎椎体间融合术(LLIF)传统上是在患者侧卧位进行椎体间植入和间接减压。在需要360度融合或直接减压的病例中,患者在手术中被重新定位到俯卧位,这种技术被称为双体位LLIF (DP-L)。为了提高手术效率和减少重新定位的需要,外科医生采用单体位入路,在侧卧位或俯卧位完成整个手术。本文探讨了LLIF和单位置LLIF的进展。比较单卧位LLIF和单卧位(P-SPS)与传统的DP-L。对单体位手术(SPS) LLIF的文献进行了叙述性回顾,以概述其关键方面和临床应用。本综述包括比较SPS侧侧和SPS易发DP-L的研究,包括系统综述、荟萃分析、回顾性研究和病例系列。还列入了被认为与彻底审查有关的其他研究。本综述未发现或纳入随机对照试验。与DP LLIF相比,侧边单位手术和P-SPS显示出手术时间和住院时间的减少。此外,这两种技术都改善了估计的出血量、并发症发生率和放射学结果。然而,这些发现的统计意义在已发表的研究中差异不一致。LLIF的发展代表了脊柱外科的显著进步。SPS建立在这个基础上,提供了对原始技术的潜在改进。虽然SPS已经显示出一定的优势,但其应用仍有进一步完善和优化的空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgery
Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
898
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurosurgery, the official journal of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, publishes research on clinical and experimental neurosurgery covering the very latest developments in science, technology, and medicine. For professionals aware of the rapid pace of developments in the field, this journal is nothing short of indispensable as the most complete window on the contemporary field of neurosurgery. Neurosurgery is the fastest-growing journal in the field, with a worldwide reputation for reliable coverage delivered with a fresh and dynamic outlook.
期刊最新文献
Comparative Effectiveness of Surgery, Embolization, and Radiosurgery for Intramedullary Glomus Arteriovenous Malformations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Dedicated to Nelson F. Bell Jr. Would Screening Studies Change Neurosurgical Science? Mechanical Thrombectomy for All Large Core Infarcts: Would Hippocrates Agree? Sponsorship for pTBI Supplement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1