Validation of the Skindex-16 questionnaire for assessing patient-reported outcomes in radiation dermatitis among breast cancer patients.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Supportive Care in Cancer Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1007/s00520-025-09227-w
Marley Day, Olivia Kuszaj, Liying Zhang, Henry Wong, S F Lee, Jennifer Kwan, Alyssa Wang, Sarah Bayrakdarian, Irene Karam, William Tran, Edward Chow
{"title":"Validation of the Skindex-16 questionnaire for assessing patient-reported outcomes in radiation dermatitis among breast cancer patients.","authors":"Marley Day, Olivia Kuszaj, Liying Zhang, Henry Wong, S F Lee, Jennifer Kwan, Alyssa Wang, Sarah Bayrakdarian, Irene Karam, William Tran, Edward Chow","doi":"10.1007/s00520-025-09227-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Radiation dermatitis (RD) is often experienced by cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy (RT) and can negatively impact the quality of life of patients. The Skindex-16 questionnaire is an instrument that measures the impact of skin conditions on patient quality of life. The Skindex-16 has been validated for use in assessing many benign conditions, however it has not yet been validated for the assessment of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for patients experiencing RD.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A group of 42 breast cancer patients enrolled in a StrataXRT study for RD were analyzed. Increases in Skindex-16 scores indicate worsening symptoms. To validate the Skindex-16, scores were compared at baseline, 2 weeks, and 3 months post-RT. Skindex-16 scores were also compared to scores from the Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events (CTCAE) for RD and the Radiation-Induced Skin Reaction Assessment Scale (RISRAS) using various statistical analyses at baseline, 2 weeks, and 3 months post-RT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Skindex-16 scores were found to be low at baseline and 3 months post-RT but peaked at 2 weeks post-RT. Significant worsening scores from baseline to 2 weeks post-RT were found in a longitudinal assessment of Skindex-16 items for several items on the patient portion of the RISRAS, but only two items on the healthcare professional RISRAS component. Skindex-16 scores showed no significant relationship to CTCAE scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This validation of the Skindex-16 questionnaire indicates that it is reliable to be used for the assessment of PROs for cancer patients experiencing RD. However, the PROs assessed by Skindex-16 do not correlate with clinician-reported outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"33 3","pages":"192"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09227-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Radiation dermatitis (RD) is often experienced by cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy (RT) and can negatively impact the quality of life of patients. The Skindex-16 questionnaire is an instrument that measures the impact of skin conditions on patient quality of life. The Skindex-16 has been validated for use in assessing many benign conditions, however it has not yet been validated for the assessment of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for patients experiencing RD.

Materials and methods: A group of 42 breast cancer patients enrolled in a StrataXRT study for RD were analyzed. Increases in Skindex-16 scores indicate worsening symptoms. To validate the Skindex-16, scores were compared at baseline, 2 weeks, and 3 months post-RT. Skindex-16 scores were also compared to scores from the Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events (CTCAE) for RD and the Radiation-Induced Skin Reaction Assessment Scale (RISRAS) using various statistical analyses at baseline, 2 weeks, and 3 months post-RT.

Results: Skindex-16 scores were found to be low at baseline and 3 months post-RT but peaked at 2 weeks post-RT. Significant worsening scores from baseline to 2 weeks post-RT were found in a longitudinal assessment of Skindex-16 items for several items on the patient portion of the RISRAS, but only two items on the healthcare professional RISRAS component. Skindex-16 scores showed no significant relationship to CTCAE scores.

Conclusion: This validation of the Skindex-16 questionnaire indicates that it is reliable to be used for the assessment of PROs for cancer patients experiencing RD. However, the PROs assessed by Skindex-16 do not correlate with clinician-reported outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于评估乳腺癌患者放射性皮炎患者报告结果的skinindex -16问卷的验证
背景与目的:放射性皮炎(RD)是接受放射治疗(RT)的癌症患者经常经历的,并会对患者的生活质量产生负面影响。skinindex -16问卷是一种测量皮肤状况对患者生活质量影响的工具。Skindex-16已被证实可用于评估许多良性疾病,但尚未被证实可用于评估RD患者的患者报告结果(pro)。材料和方法:我们分析了一组42名参与StrataXRT治疗RD研究的乳腺癌患者。皮肤指数-16评分的增加表明症状恶化。为了验证skinindex -16,在基线、2周和3个月后比较评分。在基线、放疗后2周和3个月,将Skindex-16评分与RD不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)和辐射诱发皮肤反应评估量表(RISRAS)的评分进行比较。结果:Skindex-16评分在基线和放疗后3个月较低,但在放疗后2周达到峰值。在纵向评估Skindex-16项目中,RISRAS患者部分的几个项目的评分从基线到rt后2周显著恶化,但在医疗保健专业人员的RISRAS组件中只有两个项目。Skindex-16评分与CTCAE评分无显著相关性。结论:对Skindex-16问卷的验证表明,该问卷可可靠地用于评估患有RD的癌症患者的PROs。然而,Skindex-16评估的PROs与临床报告的结果并不相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Supportive Care in Cancer
Supportive Care in Cancer 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
751
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease. Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.
期刊最新文献
Symptom clusters and network analysis in lung cancer patients receiving taxane-based chemotherapy: a comprehensive assessment using the CIPNAT multi-scale tool. Effects of psychosocial interventions on cancer-related fatigue in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. The role of spirituality in improving psychosocial well-being in women with breast cancer: a qualitative study. The effect of ginseng extract on fatigue in cancer survivors: a randomized double-blind clinical trial. Nurses' experiences and perceived needs in managing chemotherapy-induced mucositis in pediatric oncology: A qualitative exploratory study toward developing an empowerment-based nursing model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1