Impact of a multimodal intervention on junior and senior hospital physicians' job satisfaction and wellbeing: a matched pre- and post-intervention study.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Swiss medical weekly Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.57187/s.3801
Monica Levy, Jacques Donzé, Hervé Zender, Gregor John
{"title":"Impact of a multimodal intervention on junior and senior hospital physicians' job satisfaction and wellbeing: a matched pre- and post-intervention study.","authors":"Monica Levy, Jacques Donzé, Hervé Zender, Gregor John","doi":"10.57187/s.3801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physician wellbeing has a direct impact on patient care. Meta-analyses have concluded that interventions are moderately effective at reducing physician burnout, but new studies are needed to target populations at higher risk (e.g. young physicians) and determine which interventions might be most effective.   METHOD: Using matched questionnaires, we conducted a cross-sectional pre-post study of a multimodal intervention to promote physician wellbeing. The intervention involved a change in institutional culture, information on occupational wellbeing, and the organisation of undisturbed lunch breaks and short breaks during the day. The primary outcome was the proportion of physicians satisfied with their job (scoring >3 points  on the Work-Related Quality of Life [WRQoL] scale). Secondary outcomes were overall WRQoL score, WRQoL subscale scores, number of short breaks taken during the working day, number of lunch breaks taken, physicians' likeliness of recommending their job to peers, monthly overtime hours worked and monthly sick days. Subgroup analyses included women vs men, residents vs chief residents/senior physicians, and participants with vs without children. We also explored potential factors influencing WRQoL in the pre-intervention population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pre- and post-intervention questionnaires were returned by 134 (63%) and 87 (42%) physicians, respectively, with 75 responding to both (matched). The intervention significantly increased the proportion of physicians satisfied with their job (from 49/75 [65%] to 58/75 [77%], p = 0.02), median overall WRQoL score (from 3.3 [IQR: 2.8-3.8] to 3.5 [IQR: 3.1-3.8], p <0.01), median Home-Work Interface subscale score (from 2.7 [IQR: 2.0-3.3] to 3.0 [IQR: 2.3-3.7], p = 0.01) and median General Well-Being subscale score (from 3.4 [IQR: 2.6-4.0] to 3.6 [IQR: 3.0-4.0], p <0.01). Residents showed a greater increase in overall WRQoL median score (from 3.2 [IQR: 2.7-3.6] to 3.5 [IQR: 3.3-3.8]) than chief residents/senior physicians (3.3 [IQR: 2.9-3.9] to 3.4 [IQR: 3.0-3.8], p <0.01 for group difference). No significant differences were seen in other subgroups or secondary outcomes in the matched population. Among the 134 participants in the pre-intervention period, those taking a daily lunch break, sleeping 7 hours or more or self-reporting doing sports activities on weekdays had higher overall WRQoL scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This wellbeing intervention increased physicians' WRQoL scores. However, the difference was small and its relevance remains uncertain.</p>","PeriodicalId":22111,"journal":{"name":"Swiss medical weekly","volume":"155 ","pages":"3801"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swiss medical weekly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57187/s.3801","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Physician wellbeing has a direct impact on patient care. Meta-analyses have concluded that interventions are moderately effective at reducing physician burnout, but new studies are needed to target populations at higher risk (e.g. young physicians) and determine which interventions might be most effective.   METHOD: Using matched questionnaires, we conducted a cross-sectional pre-post study of a multimodal intervention to promote physician wellbeing. The intervention involved a change in institutional culture, information on occupational wellbeing, and the organisation of undisturbed lunch breaks and short breaks during the day. The primary outcome was the proportion of physicians satisfied with their job (scoring >3 points  on the Work-Related Quality of Life [WRQoL] scale). Secondary outcomes were overall WRQoL score, WRQoL subscale scores, number of short breaks taken during the working day, number of lunch breaks taken, physicians' likeliness of recommending their job to peers, monthly overtime hours worked and monthly sick days. Subgroup analyses included women vs men, residents vs chief residents/senior physicians, and participants with vs without children. We also explored potential factors influencing WRQoL in the pre-intervention population.

Results: Pre- and post-intervention questionnaires were returned by 134 (63%) and 87 (42%) physicians, respectively, with 75 responding to both (matched). The intervention significantly increased the proportion of physicians satisfied with their job (from 49/75 [65%] to 58/75 [77%], p = 0.02), median overall WRQoL score (from 3.3 [IQR: 2.8-3.8] to 3.5 [IQR: 3.1-3.8], p <0.01), median Home-Work Interface subscale score (from 2.7 [IQR: 2.0-3.3] to 3.0 [IQR: 2.3-3.7], p = 0.01) and median General Well-Being subscale score (from 3.4 [IQR: 2.6-4.0] to 3.6 [IQR: 3.0-4.0], p <0.01). Residents showed a greater increase in overall WRQoL median score (from 3.2 [IQR: 2.7-3.6] to 3.5 [IQR: 3.3-3.8]) than chief residents/senior physicians (3.3 [IQR: 2.9-3.9] to 3.4 [IQR: 3.0-3.8], p <0.01 for group difference). No significant differences were seen in other subgroups or secondary outcomes in the matched population. Among the 134 participants in the pre-intervention period, those taking a daily lunch break, sleeping 7 hours or more or self-reporting doing sports activities on weekdays had higher overall WRQoL scores.

Conclusions: This wellbeing intervention increased physicians' WRQoL scores. However, the difference was small and its relevance remains uncertain.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景:医生的健康状况对病人护理有直接影响。元分析得出结论,干预措施对减少医生职业倦怠有一定效果,但需要针对高风险人群(如年轻医生)进行新的研究,并确定哪些干预措施可能最有效。 方法:我们使用匹配的调查问卷,对促进医生身心健康的多模式干预措施进行了一项横断面前后研究。干预措施包括改变机构文化、提供有关职业健康的信息、组织不受干扰的午休和白天的短暂休息。主要结果是对工作满意的医生比例(在与工作相关的生活质量量表中得分大于 3 分)。次要结果包括 WRQoL 总分、WRQoL 子量表得分、工作日短休次数、午休次数、医生向同行推荐其工作的可能性、每月加班时数和每月病假天数。分组分析包括女性与男性、住院医师与住院总医师/高级医师、有子女与无子女的参与者。我们还探讨了影响干预前人群 WRQoL 的潜在因素:分别有 134 名(63%)和 87 名(42%)医生对干预前和干预后的问卷进行了回复,其中 75 名医生对两份问卷都进行了回复(匹配)。干预措施大大提高了对工作满意的医生比例(从 49/75 [65%] 提高到 58/75 [77%],p = 0.02)和 WRQoL 总分的中位数(从 3.3 [IQR: 2.8-3.8] 提高到 3.5 [IQR: 3.1-3.8],p 结论:干预措施提高了医生的 WRQoL 分值:这项福利干预提高了医生的 WRQoL 分数。然而,差异很小,其相关性仍不确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Swiss medical weekly
Swiss medical weekly 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Swiss Medical Weekly accepts for consideration original and review articles from all fields of medicine. The quality of SMW publications is guaranteed by a consistent policy of rigorous single-blind peer review. All editorial decisions are made by research-active academics.
期刊最新文献
Bacillus cereus endocarditis: a case-based literature review. Establishing educational entry to practice requirements for advanced practice nursing in Switzerland: current debate and nursing perspective. Impact of a multimodal intervention on junior and senior hospital physicians' job satisfaction and wellbeing: a matched pre- and post-intervention study. Healthcare needs, expectations and experiences of people experiencing homelessness in Western Switzerland: a qualitative and quantitative descriptive study. Clinical outcomes and severe complications of hospitalised children and adolescents with varicella in central Switzerland: a retrospective observational study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1