Sale of Private Equity-Owned Physician Practices and Physician Turnover.

IF 9.5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JAMA Health Forum Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.5376
Victoria Berquist, Lev Klarnet, Leemore Dafny
{"title":"Sale of Private Equity-Owned Physician Practices and Physician Turnover.","authors":"Victoria Berquist, Lev Klarnet, Leemore Dafny","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.5376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Private equity (PE) acquisition of physician practices is increasing, with owners targeting sales, or exits, in 3 to 7 years. Little is known about the association of exit with physician retention and subsequent employment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine whether PE exit of physician practices is associated with changes in physician retention and subsequent choice of practice size.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Using data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File from December 31, 2014, to December 31, 2020, this case-control study compared employment changes for physicians at PE-exiting practices sold between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018 (treatment group), with employment changes for matched control physicians in practices not sold by PE owners but with the same specialty, hospital referral region, practice size, and time period. Physicians billing fee-for-service Medicare during the study period were eligible for inclusion. A difference-in-differences design was used to compare retention between the treatment and control groups in the 2 years before and after exit using a multinomial logit model that adjusted for physician decade of graduation. Data were analyzed from August 1, 2023, to November 9, 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Exit of a PE-owned physician practice.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Physician employment outcomes included staying (continuing to bill through the initial practice), working elsewhere (only billing through other practices), and retirement (no longer billing). Whether a physician left to a join large (>120-physician) practice was also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1215 physicians included in the analysis (405 at 70 PE-exiting practices and 810 matched controls; 814 [67.0%] male and 401 (33.0%) were female. Physicians in all PE-exiting practices were typically in practices of more than 20 physicians (471 [65.2%]) and often in the South (373 [51.7%]). Dermatology was the leading specialty (216 [29.9%]), followed by family medicine (94 [13.0%]). Physicians employed in PE-exiting practices were 16.5 (95% CI, 10.6-22.3) percentage points less likely to continue working in that practice 2 years after exit compared with matched controls. There was no significant change in the probability of retirement (0 percentage points; 95% CI, -4.1 to 4.0). Physicians in PE-exiting practices were 10.1 (95% CI, 6.5 to 13.7) percentage points likelier than matched controls to join a large practice of more than 120 physicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this case-control study, PE exit was followed by an increase in physician turnover and subsequent employment at a large (>120-physician) practice relative to matched controls, notwithstanding similar turnover rates between these physicians and matched controls prior to exit. The increase in physician turnover and consolidation following PE exits has important implications for patients, physicians, investors, and physician markets.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":"6 2","pages":"e245376"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11829224/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.5376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Private equity (PE) acquisition of physician practices is increasing, with owners targeting sales, or exits, in 3 to 7 years. Little is known about the association of exit with physician retention and subsequent employment.

Objective: To examine whether PE exit of physician practices is associated with changes in physician retention and subsequent choice of practice size.

Design, setting, and participants: Using data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Doctors and Clinicians National Downloadable File from December 31, 2014, to December 31, 2020, this case-control study compared employment changes for physicians at PE-exiting practices sold between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018 (treatment group), with employment changes for matched control physicians in practices not sold by PE owners but with the same specialty, hospital referral region, practice size, and time period. Physicians billing fee-for-service Medicare during the study period were eligible for inclusion. A difference-in-differences design was used to compare retention between the treatment and control groups in the 2 years before and after exit using a multinomial logit model that adjusted for physician decade of graduation. Data were analyzed from August 1, 2023, to November 9, 2024.

Exposure: Exit of a PE-owned physician practice.

Main outcomes and measures: Physician employment outcomes included staying (continuing to bill through the initial practice), working elsewhere (only billing through other practices), and retirement (no longer billing). Whether a physician left to a join large (>120-physician) practice was also evaluated.

Results: Of the 1215 physicians included in the analysis (405 at 70 PE-exiting practices and 810 matched controls; 814 [67.0%] male and 401 (33.0%) were female. Physicians in all PE-exiting practices were typically in practices of more than 20 physicians (471 [65.2%]) and often in the South (373 [51.7%]). Dermatology was the leading specialty (216 [29.9%]), followed by family medicine (94 [13.0%]). Physicians employed in PE-exiting practices were 16.5 (95% CI, 10.6-22.3) percentage points less likely to continue working in that practice 2 years after exit compared with matched controls. There was no significant change in the probability of retirement (0 percentage points; 95% CI, -4.1 to 4.0). Physicians in PE-exiting practices were 10.1 (95% CI, 6.5 to 13.7) percentage points likelier than matched controls to join a large practice of more than 120 physicians.

Conclusions and relevance: In this case-control study, PE exit was followed by an increase in physician turnover and subsequent employment at a large (>120-physician) practice relative to matched controls, notwithstanding similar turnover rates between these physicians and matched controls prior to exit. The increase in physician turnover and consolidation following PE exits has important implications for patients, physicians, investors, and physician markets.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform. In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations. JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.
期刊最新文献
New FDA Policies Could Limit the Full Value of AI in Medicine. Changes in US Primary Care Access and Capabilities During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Errors in Figure. JAMA Health Forum. Recognizing and Strengthening the 4 Pillars of US Childhood Vaccine Policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1