Ecological momentary assessment of daily affect, stress, and nightmare reports among combat-exposed Veterans.

IF 0.8 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Dreaming Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1037/drm0000281
Katherine E Miller, Elaine M Boland, Holly Barilla, Richard J Ross, Mitchel A Kling, Seema Bhatnagar, Philip R Gehrman
{"title":"Ecological momentary assessment of daily affect, stress, and nightmare reports among combat-exposed Veterans.","authors":"Katherine E Miller, Elaine M Boland, Holly Barilla, Richard J Ross, Mitchel A Kling, Seema Bhatnagar, Philip R Gehrman","doi":"10.1037/drm0000281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research primarily in civilian samples supports bidirectional relations between daytime factors and trauma-related nightmare (TRN) reports. This study tested the relations of daytime negative affect and event-related stress with nightly occurrence and characteristics of TRNs in a sample of Veterans with and without posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied 27 U.S. combat-exposed Veterans who completed prompts across seven days of an ecological momentary assessment protocol, assessing daytime negative affect and event-related stress. Each morning they also reported whether they had a TRN and, if so, the level of disturbance and vividness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 100 morning reports were collected. Approximately half of this sample (55%) reported at least one TRN across the study week, with TRNs reported only by participants with current PTSD. In multilevel logistic regression models, higher average negative affect was associated with greater odds of having TRNs. While negative affect and event-related stress on a given day were not prospectively associated with TRNs later that night, a TRN occurrence was associated with greater next-day negative affect and event-related stress.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In contrast to findings found in civilian populations, daytime negative affect and stress during the day were not associated with subsequent TRN occurrences in this Veteran sample. Instead, there was evidence for a cumulative effect of negative affect on TRN occurrence, potentially driven by experiencing TRNs. Therefore, targeting TRNs specifically could have a positive impact on reducing this self-maintaining nightmare cycle.</p>","PeriodicalId":46498,"journal":{"name":"Dreaming","volume":"34 4","pages":"307-317"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11823435/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dreaming","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/drm0000281","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Research primarily in civilian samples supports bidirectional relations between daytime factors and trauma-related nightmare (TRN) reports. This study tested the relations of daytime negative affect and event-related stress with nightly occurrence and characteristics of TRNs in a sample of Veterans with and without posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

Methods: We studied 27 U.S. combat-exposed Veterans who completed prompts across seven days of an ecological momentary assessment protocol, assessing daytime negative affect and event-related stress. Each morning they also reported whether they had a TRN and, if so, the level of disturbance and vividness.

Results: Over 100 morning reports were collected. Approximately half of this sample (55%) reported at least one TRN across the study week, with TRNs reported only by participants with current PTSD. In multilevel logistic regression models, higher average negative affect was associated with greater odds of having TRNs. While negative affect and event-related stress on a given day were not prospectively associated with TRNs later that night, a TRN occurrence was associated with greater next-day negative affect and event-related stress.

Conclusion: In contrast to findings found in civilian populations, daytime negative affect and stress during the day were not associated with subsequent TRN occurrences in this Veteran sample. Instead, there was evidence for a cumulative effect of negative affect on TRN occurrence, potentially driven by experiencing TRNs. Therefore, targeting TRNs specifically could have a positive impact on reducing this self-maintaining nightmare cycle.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dreaming
Dreaming PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
27.80%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: Dreaming is a multidisciplinary journal, the only professional journal devoted specifically to dreaming. The journal publishes scholarly articles related to dreaming from any discipline and viewpoint. This includes - biological aspects of dreaming and sleep/dream laboratory research - psychological articles of any kind related to dreaming - clinical work on dreams regardless of theoretical perspective (Freudian, Jungian, existential, eclectic, etc.) - anthropological, sociological, and philosophical articles related to dreaming - articles about dreaming from any of the arts and humanities
期刊最新文献
Ecological momentary assessment of daily affect, stress, and nightmare reports among combat-exposed Veterans. Relationship between trait anxiety and emotions in dreams, evaluated in older adults. Veteran treatment completers’ and facilitators’ perceptions of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia and imagery rehearsal therapy for posttraumatic sleep disturbances. Sports and dreaming: An online survey of American adults. The priming effect of presleep conscious thoughts on dreams.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1