Individual differences in skilled reading and the word frequency effect.

IF 2.1 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1037/xlm0001428
Charlotte E Lee, Hayward J Godwin, Hazel I Blythe, Denis Drieghe
{"title":"Individual differences in skilled reading and the word frequency effect.","authors":"Charlotte E Lee, Hayward J Godwin, Hazel I Blythe, Denis Drieghe","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Variation in eye movement patterns can be considerable even within skilled readers. Here, individual differences and eye movements of 88 average-to-very-skilled readers were assessed to examine the reliability of previous observations of a reduced word frequency effect associated with skilled reading. Shorter fixation durations and higher skipping rates were observed for high frequency compared to low-frequency words. High scores on reading ability tests and vocabulary knowledge tests predicted reduced frequency effects in gaze duration in models with single individual differences predictors, demonstrated by faster reading of low-frequency words compared to low scorers. A principal components analysis grouped individual differences tests based on shared variance. High \"lexical proficiency\" predicted shorter gaze durations, reading times, and increased word skipping. \"Lexical proficiency\" and the Wechsler Individual Achievement Test-II comprehension test predicted a reduced frequency effect in go past times, and all tests apart from the Nelson Denny Reading Test comprehension test predicted a reduced frequency effect in sentence reading times. Data revealed surprising discrepancies in findings based on two subtests supposedly measuring comprehension (Nelson Denny Reading Test and Wechsler Individual Achievement Test-II), constituting an example of the <i>jingle fallacy</i>: the false assumption that two measures that share a name actually measure the same construct. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"1281-1302"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001428","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Variation in eye movement patterns can be considerable even within skilled readers. Here, individual differences and eye movements of 88 average-to-very-skilled readers were assessed to examine the reliability of previous observations of a reduced word frequency effect associated with skilled reading. Shorter fixation durations and higher skipping rates were observed for high frequency compared to low-frequency words. High scores on reading ability tests and vocabulary knowledge tests predicted reduced frequency effects in gaze duration in models with single individual differences predictors, demonstrated by faster reading of low-frequency words compared to low scorers. A principal components analysis grouped individual differences tests based on shared variance. High "lexical proficiency" predicted shorter gaze durations, reading times, and increased word skipping. "Lexical proficiency" and the Wechsler Individual Achievement Test-II comprehension test predicted a reduced frequency effect in go past times, and all tests apart from the Nelson Denny Reading Test comprehension test predicted a reduced frequency effect in sentence reading times. Data revealed surprising discrepancies in findings based on two subtests supposedly measuring comprehension (Nelson Denny Reading Test and Wechsler Individual Achievement Test-II), constituting an example of the jingle fallacy: the false assumption that two measures that share a name actually measure the same construct. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
熟练阅读的个体差异与词频效应。
即使在熟练的读者中,眼球运动模式的变化也是相当大的。在这里,研究人员评估了88名阅读水平从中等到非常熟练的读者的个体差异和眼球运动,以检验之前关于熟练阅读与词频降低有关的观察结果的可靠性。与低频词相比,高频词的注视时间更短,跳跃率更高。在单个体差异预测模型中,阅读能力测试和词汇知识测试的高分者预测凝视时间的频率效应会降低,这可以通过与低分者相比,低频率词汇的阅读速度更快来证明。主成分分析基于共同方差对个体差异检验进行分组。“词汇熟练度”越高,凝视时间越短,阅读时间越短,跳词次数也越多。“词汇熟练度”和韦氏个人成就测试- ii理解测试预测了过去时间的频率效应降低,除尼尔森丹尼阅读测试理解测试外,所有测试都预测了句子阅读时间的频率效应降低。数据显示,两个本应衡量理解能力的子测试(尼尔森丹尼阅读测试和韦氏个人成就测试ii)的结果存在惊人的差异,这构成了“叮当谬误”(jingle fallacy)的一个例子:错误地认为两个名称相同的测试实际上衡量的是同一个结构。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition publishes studies on perception, control of action, perceptual aspects of language processing, and related cognitive processes.
期刊最新文献
Quantifying error in effect size estimates in attention, executive function, and implicit learning. Enhancing visuospatial mapping in relational category learning. Meaning over familiarity: A secret ingredient for stimulus-response binding effects that exceeds perceptual features. The role of semantic interpretability and syntactic legality in complex nonword recognition. Modeling congruency sequence effects with the revised diffusion model for conflict tasks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1