Delivering remote pulmonary rehabilitation in Bangladesh: a mixed-method feasibility study.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Global Health Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.7189/jogh.15.04002
G M Monsur Habib, Nazim Uzzaman, Roberto Rabinovich, Sumaiya Akhter, Mustari Sultana, Mohsin Ali, Hilary Pinnock
{"title":"Delivering remote pulmonary rehabilitation in Bangladesh: a mixed-method feasibility study.","authors":"G M Monsur Habib, Nazim Uzzaman, Roberto Rabinovich, Sumaiya Akhter, Mustari Sultana, Mohsin Ali, Hilary Pinnock","doi":"10.7189/jogh.15.04002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is an effective and essential component of care for the increasing number of individuals with chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs). Despite the benefits, it remains underutilised and poorly accessible in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We aimed to determine the feasibility of delivering PR in Bangladesh at home because of pandemic travel restrictions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Aligned with the Medical Research Council framework of development and evaluation of complex interventions, we recruited individuals with CRDs from the Community Respiratory Centre, Khulna, to a mixed-methods feasibility study. We assessed their functional exercise capacity and quality of life before and after an eight-week course of home PR, and conducted semi-structured interviews with PR providers and professional stakeholders by using a topic guide aligned with the normalisation process theory (NPT) and interpreting the findings within its constructs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recruited 51 out of 61 referred patients with a range of CRDs, of whom 44 (86%) completed ≥70% of their home PR course. Functional exercise capacity, measured by the endurance shuttle walk test, improved in 78% of patients, with 48% exceeding the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). Health-related quality of life, measured by the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test, improved by more than the MCID in 83% of patients. Through the interviews, we found that PR providers encountered challenges in remote video supervision due to unstable internet connections, forcing them to resort to telephone calls. The strength of support for NPT constructs varied; many participants understood and appreciated the role of PR and could make sense of the innovation (NPT-1), and most were assessing the potential of a PR service in Bangladesh to decide if it was worthwhile (NPT-4). Participants were not yet ready to endorse or actively support (NPT-2) or operationalise (NPT-3) the roll-out of PR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A home PR programme, supported by remote supervision and monitoring, is feasible in Bangladesh, but local evidence will be needed to promote implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Health","volume":"15 ","pages":"04002"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11825123/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.15.04002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is an effective and essential component of care for the increasing number of individuals with chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs). Despite the benefits, it remains underutilised and poorly accessible in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We aimed to determine the feasibility of delivering PR in Bangladesh at home because of pandemic travel restrictions.

Methods: Aligned with the Medical Research Council framework of development and evaluation of complex interventions, we recruited individuals with CRDs from the Community Respiratory Centre, Khulna, to a mixed-methods feasibility study. We assessed their functional exercise capacity and quality of life before and after an eight-week course of home PR, and conducted semi-structured interviews with PR providers and professional stakeholders by using a topic guide aligned with the normalisation process theory (NPT) and interpreting the findings within its constructs.

Results: We recruited 51 out of 61 referred patients with a range of CRDs, of whom 44 (86%) completed ≥70% of their home PR course. Functional exercise capacity, measured by the endurance shuttle walk test, improved in 78% of patients, with 48% exceeding the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). Health-related quality of life, measured by the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test, improved by more than the MCID in 83% of patients. Through the interviews, we found that PR providers encountered challenges in remote video supervision due to unstable internet connections, forcing them to resort to telephone calls. The strength of support for NPT constructs varied; many participants understood and appreciated the role of PR and could make sense of the innovation (NPT-1), and most were assessing the potential of a PR service in Bangladesh to decide if it was worthwhile (NPT-4). Participants were not yet ready to endorse or actively support (NPT-2) or operationalise (NPT-3) the roll-out of PR.

Conclusions: A home PR programme, supported by remote supervision and monitoring, is feasible in Bangladesh, but local evidence will be needed to promote implementation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在孟加拉国提供远程肺部康复:一项混合方法可行性研究。
背景:肺康复(PR)是越来越多的慢性呼吸系统疾病(CRDs)患者的有效和必要的护理组成部分。尽管有这些好处,但在低收入和中等收入国家,它仍未得到充分利用,而且难以获得。由于大流行的旅行限制,我们的目的是确定在孟加拉国国内提供公关服务的可行性。方法:根据医学研究委员会制定和评估复杂干预措施的框架,我们从库尔纳社区呼吸中心招募了患有crd的个体,进行了一项混合方法的可行性研究。我们在为期八周的家庭公关课程前后评估了他们的功能运动能力和生活质量,并通过使用与正常化过程理论(NPT)一致的主题指南,对公关提供者和专业利益相关者进行了半结构化访谈,并在其结构中解释了研究结果。结果:我们招募了61名转诊的crd患者中的51名,其中44名(86%)完成了≥70%的家庭PR课程。通过耐力穿梭行走测试测量的功能性运动能力在78%的患者中得到改善,其中48%超过了最小临床重要差异(MCID)。以慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试(Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test)衡量的与健康相关的生活质量,在83%的患者中比MCID改善更多。通过访谈,我们发现,由于网络连接不稳定,PR提供商在远程视频监控中遇到了挑战,不得不求助于电话。对NPT结构的支持强度各不相同;许多与会者理解和赞赏公共关系的作用,能够理解这项创新(NPT-1),大多数与会者正在评估孟加拉国公共关系服务的潜力,以决定它是否值得(NPT-4)。参与者尚未准备好认可或积极支持(NPT-2)或实施(NPT-3) PR的推广。结论:在孟加拉国,由远程监督和监测支持的家庭PR计划是可行的,但需要当地证据来促进实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Global Health
Journal of Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
240
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Global Health is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Edinburgh University Global Health Society, a not-for-profit organization registered in the UK. We publish editorials, news, viewpoints, original research and review articles in two issues per year.
期刊最新文献
Management cost of respiratory syncytial virus-associated hospitalisation episodes in children: a retrospective analysis of a regionally representative medical database in Eastern China. Are hospital management practices associated with enhanced quality of care for small and sick newborns? A nationwide cross-sectional study using linked inpatient admission records in Malawi. Implementation research on enhanced community case management of pneumonia in Bangladesh: study protocol. Stillbirths by maternal-obstetric characteristics and Robson classification system: a cross-sectional study from eight district hospitals in Bangladesh. Strengthening healthcare systems to prevent antimicrobial resistance in LMICs: it is time to act.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1