Comparison of oncological outcomes of T1-3 N1 rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant radiotherapy versus no radiotherapy: A retrospective cohort study.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Scandinavian Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1177/14574969251319201
Suvi Marjasuo, Laura Koskenvuo, Anna Lepistö
{"title":"Comparison of oncological outcomes of T1-3 N1 rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant radiotherapy versus no radiotherapy: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Suvi Marjasuo, Laura Koskenvuo, Anna Lepistö","doi":"10.1177/14574969251319201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) prior to surgery has been used to reduce local recurrences in moderately advanced rectal cancer (RC). Total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery by itself can reduce the local recurrence rate in these patients. The objective was to assess whether discontinuing neoadjuvant SCRT had a negative impact on survival and local recurrence rates of moderately advanced RC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study examined 137 consecutive patients (67 neoadjuvant SCRT, 70 TME without neoadjuvant therapy) treated for rT1-3N1M0 RC without extramural venous invasion (EMVI) or a threatened surgical margin between January 2016 and March 2020 in a tertiary rectal surgery referral center. The primary objective was the impact of neoadjuvant therapy on overall, cancer-specific, and disease-free survival, and local recurrence rate. Secondary outcomes were risk factors affecting survival. The analyses were conducted on the total study cohort as well as a propensity score matched cohort of the same patient group, with the matching predicated upon age, gender, and histological T score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The oncological outcomes were similar between the two different treatment groups. The 5-year cumulative overall survival rate, calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, was 89.6% in the neoadjuvant SCRT group and 83.5% in the surgery-only group (<i>p</i> = 0.570), with the corresponding cancer-specific survival rates at 97.0% and 98.4% (<i>p</i> = 0.219) and disease-free survival rates at 97.0% and 91.9% (<i>p</i> = 0.438). No local recurrencies were detected in either group during the 5-year follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The omission of neoadjuvant SCRT in rT1-3N1M0 RC with no EMVI and no threatened resection margin caused no adverse effects on the survival of the patients. Based on this series, it appears that avoiding SCRT does not compromise the oncological outcome in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":49566,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"202-209"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14574969251319201","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) prior to surgery has been used to reduce local recurrences in moderately advanced rectal cancer (RC). Total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery by itself can reduce the local recurrence rate in these patients. The objective was to assess whether discontinuing neoadjuvant SCRT had a negative impact on survival and local recurrence rates of moderately advanced RC.

Methods: This retrospective study examined 137 consecutive patients (67 neoadjuvant SCRT, 70 TME without neoadjuvant therapy) treated for rT1-3N1M0 RC without extramural venous invasion (EMVI) or a threatened surgical margin between January 2016 and March 2020 in a tertiary rectal surgery referral center. The primary objective was the impact of neoadjuvant therapy on overall, cancer-specific, and disease-free survival, and local recurrence rate. Secondary outcomes were risk factors affecting survival. The analyses were conducted on the total study cohort as well as a propensity score matched cohort of the same patient group, with the matching predicated upon age, gender, and histological T score.

Results: The oncological outcomes were similar between the two different treatment groups. The 5-year cumulative overall survival rate, calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, was 89.6% in the neoadjuvant SCRT group and 83.5% in the surgery-only group (p = 0.570), with the corresponding cancer-specific survival rates at 97.0% and 98.4% (p = 0.219) and disease-free survival rates at 97.0% and 91.9% (p = 0.438). No local recurrencies were detected in either group during the 5-year follow-up period.

Conclusion: The omission of neoadjuvant SCRT in rT1-3N1M0 RC with no EMVI and no threatened resection margin caused no adverse effects on the survival of the patients. Based on this series, it appears that avoiding SCRT does not compromise the oncological outcome in these patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项回顾性队列研究:T1-3 N1直肠癌患者接受新辅助放疗与不接受放疗的肿瘤预后比较
背景和目的:手术前新辅助短程放疗(SCRT)已被用于减少中晚期直肠癌(RC)的局部复发。全肠系膜切除(TME)手术本身可以降低这些患者的局部复发率。目的是评估停止新辅助SCRT是否会对中晚期RC的生存和局部复发率产生负面影响。方法:本回顾性研究调查了2016年1月至2020年3月在三级直肠外科转诊中心连续接受rT1-3N1M0 RC治疗的137例患者(67例新辅助SCRT, 70例未经新辅助治疗的TME),无外静脉侵入(EMVI)或手术边缘威胁。主要目的是新辅助治疗对总体、癌症特异性、无病生存和局部复发率的影响。次要结局是影响生存的危险因素。对整个研究队列以及同一患者组的倾向评分匹配队列进行分析,匹配基于年龄、性别和组织学T评分。结果:两组患者肿瘤预后相近。使用Kaplan-Meier方法计算的5年累积总生存率,新辅助SCRT组为89.6%,单纯手术组为83.5% (p = 0.570),相应的癌症特异性生存率分别为97.0%和98.4% (p = 0.219),无病生存率分别为97.0%和91.9% (p = 0.438)。在5年随访期间,两组均未发现局部复发。结论:在无EMVI、无切除边缘威胁的rT1-3N1M0癌中,不进行新辅助SCRT对患者的生存无不良影响。基于这一系列研究,似乎避免SCRT并不会影响这些患者的肿瘤预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
37
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Surgery (SJS) is the official peer reviewed journal of the Finnish Surgical Society and the Scandinavian Surgical Society. It publishes original and review articles from all surgical fields and specialties to reflect the interests of our diverse and international readership that consists of surgeons from all specialties and continents.
期刊最新文献
Preoperative expectations and quality of life after breast reconstruction: Finnish validation of the BREAST-Q Reconstruction Expectations module. Enhanced recovery after surgery in diverticular disease: A multicenter comparison with colorectal cancer. Cholecystectomy or non-operative management for cholecystitis in elderly patients: An analysis based on hospital practice patterns. Gender-affirming healthcare in the Nordic countries: An overview. Current practices and perspectives on gender-affirming breast and chest wall surgery in the Nordic region: An overview.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1