Feasibility and usefulness of the elongation of ileocolic pedicle with extended ileal resection on secure anastomosis after laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: a retrospective observational study.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Techniques in Coloproctology Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1007/s10151-024-03091-2
Tatsuya Manabe, Yusuke Mizuuchi, Keiichiro Okuyama, Shin Takesue, Takaaki Fujimoto, Futoshi Tanaka, Masafumi Nakamura, Hirokazu Noshiro
{"title":"Feasibility and usefulness of the elongation of ileocolic pedicle with extended ileal resection on secure anastomosis after laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: a retrospective observational study.","authors":"Tatsuya Manabe, Yusuke Mizuuchi, Keiichiro Okuyama, Shin Takesue, Takaaki Fujimoto, Futoshi Tanaka, Masafumi Nakamura, Hirokazu Noshiro","doi":"10.1007/s10151-024-03091-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Tension-free ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) for ulcerative colitis (UC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is important for avoiding anastomotic complications. We have employed the elongation of ileocolic pedicle (ICP) with extended ileal resection as one of the mesenteric-lengthening techniques. In this study, we examined the feasibility and usefulness of our mesenteric-lengthening technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study enrolled 60 patients for whom laparoscopic RPC with IPAA was electively planned for UC and FAP from January 2009 to December 2022. In 41 patients (\"conventional group\"), the ileum was cut flush to the cecum without ileal resection, and in 19 patients (\"experimental group\"), the elongation of the ICP with extended ileal resection was conducted. The short-term outcomes were compared between the two groups, and the risk factor for anastomotic complications was examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The preoperative and intraoperative parameters did not differ between the two groups. However, the incidence of anastomosis-related complications (ARCs) was significantly lower in the experimental group than in the conventional group (0.0% versus 14.6%, respectively; p = 0.027). Univariate analysis demonstrated that the elongation of the ICP with extended ileal resection was significantly correlated with ARCs (p = 0.027 and p = 0.030, respectively), although multivariate analysis did not show the independent factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The lengthening technique using the elongation of the ICP with extended ileal resection is feasible and safe, and might be one choice for secure IPAA during the laparoscopic approach for RPC.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":"29 1","pages":"66"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques in Coloproctology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-024-03091-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Tension-free ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) for ulcerative colitis (UC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is important for avoiding anastomotic complications. We have employed the elongation of ileocolic pedicle (ICP) with extended ileal resection as one of the mesenteric-lengthening techniques. In this study, we examined the feasibility and usefulness of our mesenteric-lengthening technique.

Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 60 patients for whom laparoscopic RPC with IPAA was electively planned for UC and FAP from January 2009 to December 2022. In 41 patients ("conventional group"), the ileum was cut flush to the cecum without ileal resection, and in 19 patients ("experimental group"), the elongation of the ICP with extended ileal resection was conducted. The short-term outcomes were compared between the two groups, and the risk factor for anastomotic complications was examined.

Results: The preoperative and intraoperative parameters did not differ between the two groups. However, the incidence of anastomosis-related complications (ARCs) was significantly lower in the experimental group than in the conventional group (0.0% versus 14.6%, respectively; p = 0.027). Univariate analysis demonstrated that the elongation of the ICP with extended ileal resection was significantly correlated with ARCs (p = 0.027 and p = 0.030, respectively), although multivariate analysis did not show the independent factors.

Conclusion: The lengthening technique using the elongation of the ICP with extended ileal resection is feasible and safe, and might be one choice for secure IPAA during the laparoscopic approach for RPC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜恢复性直结肠切除术后回肠蒂延伸切除安全吻合的可行性和有效性:回顾性观察研究。
目的:在溃疡性结肠炎(UC)和家族性腺瘤性息肉病(FAP)恢复性直结肠切除术(RPC)中采用无张力回肠袋-肛门吻合术(IPAA)是避免吻合并发症的重要方法。我们采用延长回肠结肠蒂(ICP)与延长回肠切除作为肠系膜延长技术之一。在这项研究中,我们检查了我们的肠系膜延长技术的可行性和实用性。方法:本回顾性研究纳入了60例2009年1月至2022年12月选择性计划腹腔镜RPC合并IPAA治疗UC和FAP的患者。41例患者(“常规组”)在不切除回肠的情况下将回肠与盲肠平切,19例患者(“实验组”)在延长回肠切除的情况下延长ICP。比较两组近期疗效,探讨吻合口并发症发生的危险因素。结果:两组术前、术中各项参数无明显差异。然而,实验组吻合口相关并发症(ARCs)的发生率明显低于常规组(分别为0.0%和14.6%;p = 0.027)。单因素分析显示,延长回肠切除术后ICP的延长与ARCs显著相关(p = 0.027和p = 0.030),但多因素分析未显示独立因素。结论:延长ICP并扩大回肠切除术的延长技术是可行和安全的,可能是腹腔镜下RPC入路安全IPAA的一种选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Techniques in Coloproctology
Techniques in Coloproctology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
176
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Techniques in Coloproctology is an international journal fully devoted to diagnostic and operative procedures carried out in the management of colorectal diseases. Imaging, clinical physiology, laparoscopy, open abdominal surgery and proctoperineology are the main topics covered by the journal. Reviews, original articles, technical notes and short communications with many detailed illustrations render this publication indispensable for coloproctologists and related specialists. Both surgeons and gastroenterologists are represented on the distinguished Editorial Board, together with pathologists, radiologists and basic scientists from all over the world. The journal is strongly recommended to those who wish to be updated on recent developments in the field, and improve the standards of their work. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1965 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted. Reports of animal experiments must state that the Principles of Laboratory Animal Care (NIH publication no. 86-23 revised 1985) were followed as were applicable national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals). The Editor-in-Chief reserves the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. Authors will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill such requirements.
期刊最新文献
Fistulotomy and lateral internal sphincterotomy: two sides of the same coin in the treatment of simple anal fistulas and anal fissures. Laparoscopic-total extraperitoneal anterior rectopexy (L-TEAR)-a preliminary report. Correction: Techniques in coloproctology-controversies in coloproctology: resection rectopexy is an underutilised procedure in the management of both symptomatic high-grade internal and external rectal prolapse. Sacral neuromodulation improves bowel function in patients with low anterior resection syndrome. Transillumination-guided endoscopic and transanal recanalization for total anastomotic stenosis following low anterior resection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1