Is There a "Weekend Effect" on In-Hospital Outcomes of Type a Aortic Dissection Repair? A Population-Based Analysis of National Inpatient Sample From 2015-2020.

IF 0.7 Vascular and endovascular surgery Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1177/15385744251321293
Renxi Li, Stephen J Huddleston
{"title":"Is There a \"Weekend Effect\" on In-Hospital Outcomes of Type a Aortic Dissection Repair? A Population-Based Analysis of National Inpatient Sample From 2015-2020.","authors":"Renxi Li, Stephen J Huddleston","doi":"10.1177/15385744251321293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background\"Weekend effect\" in type A aortic dissection (TAAD) repair has been identified in several countries where weekend admission is associated with higher mortality rates. However, in the US, findings have been mixed regarding the \"weekend effect\" on TAAD outcomes. This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive, population-based analysis of the association between weekend admission and the in-hospital outcomes of TAAD repair using a large-scale national registry.MethodsPatients who underwent TAAD repair were identified in National Inpatient Sample from Q4 2015-2020. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to compare in-hospital outcomes between patients admitted on the weekend vs weekday, where demographics, comorbidities, hospital characteristics, primary payer status, and transfer-in status were adjusted.ResultsThere were 1007 and 3275 patients who underwent TAAD repair under weekend and weekday admission, respectively. Patients admitted on the weekend were more likely to get transferred in from a different acute care hospital and have renal malperfusion. After multivariable analysis, patients admitted on the weekend and weekday had comparable times from admission to operation (0.88 ± 2.64 vs 0.92 ± 2.99 days, <i>P</i> = 0.64) and in-hospital mortality (15.99% vs 14.84%, aOR = 1.119, 95 CI = 0.914-1.37, <i>P</i> = 0.28). All other in-hospital outcomes, hospital length of stay, and total hospital charge were similar between the 2 cohorts.ConclusionPatients admitted on weekends and weekdays had comparable times from admission to operation, as well as similar in-hospital mortality and morbidities. These findings suggest the effectiveness of weekend emergency care protocols for TAAD patients and the lack of a \"weekend effect\" on TAAD repair in the United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"457-463"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744251321293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background"Weekend effect" in type A aortic dissection (TAAD) repair has been identified in several countries where weekend admission is associated with higher mortality rates. However, in the US, findings have been mixed regarding the "weekend effect" on TAAD outcomes. This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive, population-based analysis of the association between weekend admission and the in-hospital outcomes of TAAD repair using a large-scale national registry.MethodsPatients who underwent TAAD repair were identified in National Inpatient Sample from Q4 2015-2020. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to compare in-hospital outcomes between patients admitted on the weekend vs weekday, where demographics, comorbidities, hospital characteristics, primary payer status, and transfer-in status were adjusted.ResultsThere were 1007 and 3275 patients who underwent TAAD repair under weekend and weekday admission, respectively. Patients admitted on the weekend were more likely to get transferred in from a different acute care hospital and have renal malperfusion. After multivariable analysis, patients admitted on the weekend and weekday had comparable times from admission to operation (0.88 ± 2.64 vs 0.92 ± 2.99 days, P = 0.64) and in-hospital mortality (15.99% vs 14.84%, aOR = 1.119, 95 CI = 0.914-1.37, P = 0.28). All other in-hospital outcomes, hospital length of stay, and total hospital charge were similar between the 2 cohorts.ConclusionPatients admitted on weekends and weekdays had comparable times from admission to operation, as well as similar in-hospital mortality and morbidities. These findings suggest the effectiveness of weekend emergency care protocols for TAAD patients and the lack of a "weekend effect" on TAAD repair in the United States.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
a型主动脉夹层修复的住院结果是否存在“周末效应”?2015-2020年全国住院患者样本人口分析
背景:在一些国家,A型主动脉夹层(TAAD)修复中的“周末效应”已被确定,在这些国家,周末入院与较高的死亡率相关。然而,在美国,关于“周末效应”对TAAD结果的影响,研究结果好坏参半。本研究旨在通过大规模的国家登记,对周末入院与TAAD修复住院结果之间的关系进行全面的、基于人群的分析。方法:选取2015-2020年第四季度全国住院患者样本中接受TAAD修复的患者。采用多变量logistic回归比较周末和工作日入院患者的住院结果,其中调整了人口统计学、合并症、医院特征、主要付款人状况和转院状况。结果:周末和工作日分别有1007例和3275例患者接受TAAD修复。周末入院的患者更有可能从不同的急症护理医院转来,并且肾脏灌注不良。经多变量分析,周末和工作日住院患者入院至手术时间比较(0.88±2.64 vs 0.92±2.99天,P = 0.64),住院死亡率比较(15.99% vs 14.84%, aOR = 1.119, 95 CI = 0.914-1.37, P = 0.28)。所有其他住院结果、住院时间和总住院费用在两个队列之间相似。结论:周末和工作日住院的患者从入院到手术的时间相当,住院死亡率和发病率相似。这些发现表明,在美国,TAAD患者的周末紧急护理方案是有效的,而TAAD修复缺乏“周末效应”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Early and Mid-term Results From a Tertiary Care Center for Total Aortic Arch Replacement Using the Thoraflex Hybrid Graft. Educational Attainment and Outcomes of Hemodialysis Access Creation. The Predictive Role of BUN/Creatinine Ratio and Inflammatory Markers in Determining Amputation Risk in Acute Limb Ischemia Patients. Secondary Prevention after Carotid Stenting in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Three Techniques for Coil Embolization of Splenic Artery Aneurysms: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1