The Need for Continuing Blinded Pose- and Activity Prediction Benchmarks.

IF 5.3 2区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling Pub Date : 2025-03-10 Epub Date: 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1021/acs.jcim.4c02296
Christian Kramer, John Chodera, Kelly L Damm-Ganamet, Michael K Gilson, Judith Günther, Uta Lessel, Richard A Lewis, David Mobley, Eva Nittinger, Adam Pecina, Matthieu Schapira, W Patrick Walters
{"title":"The Need for Continuing Blinded Pose- and Activity Prediction Benchmarks.","authors":"Christian Kramer, John Chodera, Kelly L Damm-Ganamet, Michael K Gilson, Judith Günther, Uta Lessel, Richard A Lewis, David Mobley, Eva Nittinger, Adam Pecina, Matthieu Schapira, W Patrick Walters","doi":"10.1021/acs.jcim.4c02296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Computational tools for structure-based drug design (SBDD) are widely used in drug discovery and can provide valuable insights to advance projects in an efficient and cost-effective manner. However, despite the importance of SBDD to the field, the underlying methodologies and techniques have many limitations. In particular, binding pose and activity predictions (P-AP) are still not consistently reliable. We strongly believe that a limiting factor is the lack of a widely accepted and established community benchmarking process that independently assesses the performance and drives the development of methods, similar to the CASP benchmarking challenge for protein structure prediction. Here, we provide an overview of P-AP, unblinded benchmarking data sets, and blinded benchmarking initiatives (concluded and ongoing) and offer a perspective on learnings and the future of the field. To accelerate a breakthrough on the development of novel P-AP methods, it is necessary for the community to establish and support a long-term benchmark challenge that provides nonbiased training/test/validation sets, a systematic independent validation, and a forum for scientific discussions.</p>","PeriodicalId":44,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling ","volume":" ","pages":"2180-2190"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12818095/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling ","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.4c02296","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Computational tools for structure-based drug design (SBDD) are widely used in drug discovery and can provide valuable insights to advance projects in an efficient and cost-effective manner. However, despite the importance of SBDD to the field, the underlying methodologies and techniques have many limitations. In particular, binding pose and activity predictions (P-AP) are still not consistently reliable. We strongly believe that a limiting factor is the lack of a widely accepted and established community benchmarking process that independently assesses the performance and drives the development of methods, similar to the CASP benchmarking challenge for protein structure prediction. Here, we provide an overview of P-AP, unblinded benchmarking data sets, and blinded benchmarking initiatives (concluded and ongoing) and offer a perspective on learnings and the future of the field. To accelerate a breakthrough on the development of novel P-AP methods, it is necessary for the community to establish and support a long-term benchmark challenge that provides nonbiased training/test/validation sets, a systematic independent validation, and a forum for scientific discussions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
持续盲法姿势和活动预测基准的必要性。
基于结构的药物设计(SBDD)的计算工具广泛应用于药物发现,可以提供有价值的见解,以高效和经济的方式推进项目。然而,尽管SBDD对该领域很重要,但其基础方法和技术有许多局限性。特别是,结合姿势和活动预测(P-AP)仍然不是始终可靠的。我们坚信,一个限制因素是缺乏一个被广泛接受和建立的社区基准过程,该过程可以独立评估性能并推动方法的发展,类似于CASP对蛋白质结构预测的基准挑战。在这里,我们概述了P-AP、非盲法基准测试数据集和盲法基准测试计划(已结束和正在进行),并提供了对该领域的学习和未来的看法。为了加速在新型P-AP方法的开发上取得突破,社区有必要建立和支持一个长期的基准挑战,提供无偏见的训练/测试/验证集,系统的独立验证和科学讨论论坛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
529
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling publishes papers reporting new methodology and/or important applications in the fields of chemical informatics and molecular modeling. Specific topics include the representation and computer-based searching of chemical databases, molecular modeling, computer-aided molecular design of new materials, catalysts, or ligands, development of new computational methods or efficient algorithms for chemical software, and biopharmaceutical chemistry including analyses of biological activity and other issues related to drug discovery. Astute chemists, computer scientists, and information specialists look to this monthly’s insightful research studies, programming innovations, and software reviews to keep current with advances in this integral, multidisciplinary field. As a subscriber you’ll stay abreast of database search systems, use of graph theory in chemical problems, substructure search systems, pattern recognition and clustering, analysis of chemical and physical data, molecular modeling, graphics and natural language interfaces, bibliometric and citation analysis, and synthesis design and reactions databases.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Diversity of Template-Free Retrosynthesis Prediction via Hierarchical Latent Variables The Open Molecular Software Foundation (OMSF) and the Growing Role of Open Source Software in Molecular Modeling. Comparative Molecular Dynamics Study of the Thermal Stability of CheY Proteins from Hyperthermophilic and Mesophilic Organisms. Issue Editorial Masthead Benchmarking In Silico Metabolite Prediction Tools against Human Radiolabeled ADME Data for Small-Molecule Drugs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1