Classification of Hearing Status Based on Pupil Measures During Sentence Perception.

IF 2.2 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research Pub Date : 2025-03-05 Epub Date: 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00005
Patrycja Lebiecka-Johansen, Adriana A Zekveld, Dorothea Wendt, Thomas Koelewijn, Afaan I Muhammad, Sophia E Kramer
{"title":"Classification of Hearing Status Based on Pupil Measures During Sentence Perception.","authors":"Patrycja Lebiecka-Johansen, Adriana A Zekveld, Dorothea Wendt, Thomas Koelewijn, Afaan I Muhammad, Sophia E Kramer","doi":"10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Speech understanding in noise can be effortful, especially for people with hearing impairment. To compensate for reduced acuity, hearing-impaired (HI) listeners may be allocating listening effort differently than normal-hearing (NH) peers. We expected that this might influence measures derived from the pupil dilation response. To investigate this in more detail, we assessed the sensitivity of pupil measures to hearing-related changes in effort allocation. We used a machine learning-based classification framework capable of combining and ranking measures to examine hearing-related, stimulus-related (signal-to-noise ratio [SNR]), and task response-related changes in pupil measures.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Pupil data from 32 NH (40-70 years old, <i>M</i> = 51.3 years, six males) and 32 HI (31-76 years old, <i>M</i> = 59 years, 13 males) listeners were recorded during an adaptive speech reception threshold test. Peak pupil dilation (PPD), mean pupil dilation (MPD), principal pupil components (rotated principal components [RPCs]), and baseline pupil size (BPS) were calculated. As a precondition for ranking pupil measures, the ability to classify hearing status (NH/HI), SNR (high/low), and task response (correct/incorrect) above random prediction level was assessed. This precondition was met when classifying hearing status in subsets of data with varying SNR and task response, SNR in the NH group, and task response in the HI group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A combination of pupil measures was necessary to classify the dependent factors. Hearing status, SNR, and task response were predicted primarily by the established measures-PPD (maximum effort), RPC2 (speech processing), and BPS (task anticipation)-and by the novel measures RPC1 (listening) and RPC3 (response preparation) in tasks involving SNR as an outcome or sometimes difficulty criterion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A machine learning-based classification framework can assess sensitivity of, and rank the importance of, pupil measures in relation to three effort modulators (factors) during speech perception in noise. This indicates that the effects of these factors on the pupil measures allow for reasonable classification performance. Moreover, the varying contributions of each measure to the classification models suggest they are not equally affected by these factors. Thus, this study enhances our understanding of pupil responses and their sensitivity to relevant factors.</p><p><strong>Supplemental material: </strong>https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.28225199.</p>","PeriodicalId":51254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","volume":" ","pages":"1188-1208"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Speech understanding in noise can be effortful, especially for people with hearing impairment. To compensate for reduced acuity, hearing-impaired (HI) listeners may be allocating listening effort differently than normal-hearing (NH) peers. We expected that this might influence measures derived from the pupil dilation response. To investigate this in more detail, we assessed the sensitivity of pupil measures to hearing-related changes in effort allocation. We used a machine learning-based classification framework capable of combining and ranking measures to examine hearing-related, stimulus-related (signal-to-noise ratio [SNR]), and task response-related changes in pupil measures.

Method: Pupil data from 32 NH (40-70 years old, M = 51.3 years, six males) and 32 HI (31-76 years old, M = 59 years, 13 males) listeners were recorded during an adaptive speech reception threshold test. Peak pupil dilation (PPD), mean pupil dilation (MPD), principal pupil components (rotated principal components [RPCs]), and baseline pupil size (BPS) were calculated. As a precondition for ranking pupil measures, the ability to classify hearing status (NH/HI), SNR (high/low), and task response (correct/incorrect) above random prediction level was assessed. This precondition was met when classifying hearing status in subsets of data with varying SNR and task response, SNR in the NH group, and task response in the HI group.

Results: A combination of pupil measures was necessary to classify the dependent factors. Hearing status, SNR, and task response were predicted primarily by the established measures-PPD (maximum effort), RPC2 (speech processing), and BPS (task anticipation)-and by the novel measures RPC1 (listening) and RPC3 (response preparation) in tasks involving SNR as an outcome or sometimes difficulty criterion.

Conclusions: A machine learning-based classification framework can assess sensitivity of, and rank the importance of, pupil measures in relation to three effort modulators (factors) during speech perception in noise. This indicates that the effects of these factors on the pupil measures allow for reasonable classification performance. Moreover, the varying contributions of each measure to the classification models suggest they are not equally affected by these factors. Thus, this study enhances our understanding of pupil responses and their sensitivity to relevant factors.

Supplemental material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.28225199.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于瞳孔测量的句子感知听力状况分类。
目的:在噪音中理解语言是很困难的,尤其是对听力受损的人来说。为了弥补听力下降,听力受损(HI)的听众可能会与正常听力(NH)的同龄人分配不同的听力努力。我们预计这可能会影响瞳孔扩张反应的测量结果。为了更详细地研究这一点,我们评估了瞳孔测量对听力相关的努力分配变化的敏感性。我们使用了一个基于机器学习的分类框架,该框架能够组合和排序测量来检查瞳孔测量中与听力相关、与刺激相关(信噪比[SNR])和与任务反应相关的变化。方法:对32例NH组(40 ~ 70岁,M = 51.3岁,男6例)和32例HI组(31 ~ 76岁,M = 59岁,男13例)听者进行适应性语音接收阈值测试。计算峰值瞳孔扩张(PPD)、平均瞳孔扩张(MPD)、瞳孔主成分(旋转主成分[RPCs])和基线瞳孔大小(BPS)。作为对小学生各项指标进行排序的前提条件,评估学生对听力状况(NH/HI)、信噪比(高/低)和任务反应(正确/不正确)在随机预测水平以上的分类能力。在对不同信噪比和任务反应的数据子集、NH组的信噪比和HI组的任务反应进行听力状态分类时,满足了这一前提条件。结果:结合瞳孔测量对影响因素进行分类是必要的。听力状况、信噪比和任务反应主要通过既定的测量方法ppd(最大努力)、RPC2(语音处理)和BPS(任务预期)来预测,并通过新的测量方法RPC1(听力)和RPC3(反应准备)来预测信噪比作为结果或有时是难度标准的任务。结论:基于机器学习的分类框架可以评估噪声语音感知过程中瞳孔测量与三个努力调节器(因素)相关的敏感性,并对其重要性进行排序。这表明这些因素对学生测量的影响允许合理的分类表现。此外,每种措施对分类模型的不同贡献表明,它们受到这些因素的影响并不均等。因此,本研究增强了我们对瞳孔反应及其对相关因素的敏感性的理解。补充资料:https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.28225199。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
19.20%
发文量
538
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: JSLHR publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles on the normal and disordered processes in speech, language, hearing, and related areas such as cognition, oral-motor function, and swallowing. The journal is an international outlet for both basic research on communication processes and clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, and management of communication disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. JSLHR seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of communication sciences and disorders, including speech production and perception; anatomy and physiology of speech and voice; genetics, biomechanics, and other basic sciences pertaining to human communication; mastication and swallowing; speech disorders; voice disorders; development of speech, language, or hearing in children; normal language processes; language disorders; disorders of hearing and balance; psychoacoustics; and anatomy and physiology of hearing.
期刊最新文献
Progress Toward Estimating the Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Intelligibility: A Crowdsourced Perceptual Experiment. The Benefits of Robustness in Measures of Spatiotemporal Stability: An Investigation in Childhood Apraxia of Speech. Cognitive Predictors of Perception and Adaption to Dysarthric Speech in Older Adults. Conflicting Evidence for a Motor Timing Theory of Stuttering: Choral Speech Changes the Rhythm of Both Neurotypical and Stuttering Talkers, but in Opposite Directions. Disease-Specific Speech Movement Characteristics of the Tongue and Jaw.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1