Disparities in Aortic Aneurysm Mortality Trends: Revealing Sex and Racial Inequalities.

IF 0.7 Vascular and endovascular surgery Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1177/15385744251321621
Masashi Azuma, Andrew Ramirez, G William Moser, Kenny J Oh, Mohammed Abul Kashem, Yoshiya Toyoda, Suyog Mokashi
{"title":"Disparities in Aortic Aneurysm Mortality Trends: Revealing Sex and Racial Inequalities.","authors":"Masashi Azuma, Andrew Ramirez, G William Moser, Kenny J Oh, Mohammed Abul Kashem, Yoshiya Toyoda, Suyog Mokashi","doi":"10.1177/15385744251321621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundAbdominal aortic dissection or aneurysm (AAA) is a significant health concern in developed nations often underdiagnosed with poor outcomes. Despite a decline in aortic dissection and aneurysm mortality rates in the US from 1999 to 2020, reported by the CDC, this improvement disproportionately favors males and Caucasians. This study aims to elucidate these disparities.MethodsData from the CDC Wonder database from 1999 to 2020 on aortic aneurysm, including abdominal, thoracic, and thoracoabdominal aneurysms and rupture related deaths in the US were analyzed. Mortality rates were compared across sex, race, and geographic location separated by state. Mortality was normalized based on population and analyzed with linear regression models with all plots showing goodness of fit.ResultsOverall, the mortality gap between male and female cohorts with aortic aneurysm-related deaths widened by 0.57 per 100,000 deaths per year (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Mortality between Caucasians with African American and Asian American cohorts showed reductions of 0.41 per 100,000 per year (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Caucasian and male cohorts started at higher mortality rates when compared to their competitive cohorts.ConclusionsDespite a reduction in mortality rates among individuals with aortic aneurysm in the US from 1999 to 2020, this decline disproportionately benefits males and Caucasians over African American and Asian populations. Although Caucasians and males had higher mortality in 1999, their decline is significantly greater. Following current trends, Caucasian and male mortalities will be lower than minority groups by 2026. Targeted interventions are needed to address these disparities effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":94265,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"464-470"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular and endovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744251321621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundAbdominal aortic dissection or aneurysm (AAA) is a significant health concern in developed nations often underdiagnosed with poor outcomes. Despite a decline in aortic dissection and aneurysm mortality rates in the US from 1999 to 2020, reported by the CDC, this improvement disproportionately favors males and Caucasians. This study aims to elucidate these disparities.MethodsData from the CDC Wonder database from 1999 to 2020 on aortic aneurysm, including abdominal, thoracic, and thoracoabdominal aneurysms and rupture related deaths in the US were analyzed. Mortality rates were compared across sex, race, and geographic location separated by state. Mortality was normalized based on population and analyzed with linear regression models with all plots showing goodness of fit.ResultsOverall, the mortality gap between male and female cohorts with aortic aneurysm-related deaths widened by 0.57 per 100,000 deaths per year (P < 0.001). Mortality between Caucasians with African American and Asian American cohorts showed reductions of 0.41 per 100,000 per year (P < 0.001). Caucasian and male cohorts started at higher mortality rates when compared to their competitive cohorts.ConclusionsDespite a reduction in mortality rates among individuals with aortic aneurysm in the US from 1999 to 2020, this decline disproportionately benefits males and Caucasians over African American and Asian populations. Although Caucasians and males had higher mortality in 1999, their decline is significantly greater. Following current trends, Caucasian and male mortalities will be lower than minority groups by 2026. Targeted interventions are needed to address these disparities effectively.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主动脉瘤死亡率趋势的差异:揭示性别和种族不平等。
背景:腹主动脉夹层或动脉瘤(AAA)在发达国家是一个重要的健康问题,通常诊断不足且预后不良。美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)的报告显示,尽管1999年至2020年美国的主动脉夹层和动脉瘤死亡率有所下降,但这种改善不成比例地有利于男性和高加索人。本研究旨在阐明这些差异。方法:分析1999年至2020年美国CDC Wonder数据库中有关主动脉瘤的数据,包括腹、胸、胸腹动脉瘤和破裂相关死亡。研究人员对不同性别、种族和地理位置(按州划分)的死亡率进行了比较。死亡率根据总体归一化,并使用线性回归模型进行分析,所有图均显示拟合优度。结果:总体而言,与主动脉瘤相关死亡的男性和女性队列之间的死亡率差距扩大了0.57 / 100000 (P < 0.001)。白种人与非裔美国人和亚裔美国人队列的死亡率每年降低0.41 / 100,000 (P < 0.001)。与竞争对手相比,白人和男性队列的死亡率开始时更高。结论:尽管从1999年到2020年,美国主动脉瘤患者的死亡率有所下降,但这种下降对男性和白种人的益处大于非洲裔美国人和亚洲人。尽管1999年白人和男性的死亡率较高,但其下降幅度明显更大。按照目前的趋势,到2026年,白种人和男性的死亡率将低于少数族裔。需要有针对性的干预措施来有效地解决这些差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Early and Mid-term Results From a Tertiary Care Center for Total Aortic Arch Replacement Using the Thoraflex Hybrid Graft. Educational Attainment and Outcomes of Hemodialysis Access Creation. The Predictive Role of BUN/Creatinine Ratio and Inflammatory Markers in Determining Amputation Risk in Acute Limb Ischemia Patients. Secondary Prevention after Carotid Stenting in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Three Techniques for Coil Embolization of Splenic Artery Aneurysms: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1