Smart But Maladapted? Differences in the Psychological Functioning of Intellectually Gifted Students Compared With Average-Ability Students

IF 4 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Gifted Child Quarterly Pub Date : 2025-02-15 DOI:10.1177/00169862241310871
Steffani Saß, Olaf Köller, Friederike Zimmermann
{"title":"Smart But Maladapted? Differences in the Psychological Functioning of Intellectually Gifted Students Compared With Average-Ability Students","authors":"Steffani Saß, Olaf Köller, Friederike Zimmermann","doi":"10.1177/00169862241310871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relationship between giftedness and psychological functioning has been studied extensively, but conflicting views persist. Whereas some studies have suggested that gifted children are at risk of developing emotional and behavioral disorders, others have proposed that they have superior socioemotional adjustment compared with average-ability peers. Using a large unselected sample ( N = 3,918), we examined n = 100 gifted students matched via propensity score matching with n = 100 average-ability students. Gifted students showed higher academic achievement in math and reading (standardized test scores and grades), higher self-concept in math, and lower teacher-rated externalizing problems. All other comparisons on social and emotional-behavioral functioning as rated by parents, teachers, or classmates did not suggest any differences between the two groups. Giftedness appears to be a protective factor rather than a risk factor for psychological functioning. These results have important implications for the identification, support, and education of gifted children.","PeriodicalId":47514,"journal":{"name":"Gifted Child Quarterly","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gifted Child Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862241310871","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relationship between giftedness and psychological functioning has been studied extensively, but conflicting views persist. Whereas some studies have suggested that gifted children are at risk of developing emotional and behavioral disorders, others have proposed that they have superior socioemotional adjustment compared with average-ability peers. Using a large unselected sample ( N = 3,918), we examined n = 100 gifted students matched via propensity score matching with n = 100 average-ability students. Gifted students showed higher academic achievement in math and reading (standardized test scores and grades), higher self-concept in math, and lower teacher-rated externalizing problems. All other comparisons on social and emotional-behavioral functioning as rated by parents, teachers, or classmates did not suggest any differences between the two groups. Giftedness appears to be a protective factor rather than a risk factor for psychological functioning. These results have important implications for the identification, support, and education of gifted children.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
聪明但不适应?资优学生与一般学生心理功能的差异
天赋和心理功能之间的关系已被广泛研究,但矛盾的观点仍然存在。尽管一些研究表明,天才儿童有患情绪和行为障碍的风险,但也有人提出,与能力一般的同龄人相比,他们有更好的社会情绪适应能力。使用大量未选择样本(N = 3,918),我们检查了N = 100名通过倾向得分匹配的资优学生和N = 100名平均能力学生。资优学生在数学和阅读(标准化考试成绩和成绩)方面的学术成就更高,在数学方面的自我概念更高,教师对外化问题的评价也更低。所有其他由父母、老师或同学评定的社会和情感行为功能的比较都没有表明两组之间有任何差异。天赋似乎是心理功能的保护因素,而不是风险因素。这些结果对天才儿童的识别、支持和教育具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
29.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Gifted Child Quarterly (GCQ) is the official journal of the National Association for Gifted Children. As a leading journal in the field, GCQ publishes original scholarly reviews of the literature and quantitative or qualitative research studies. GCQ welcomes manuscripts offering new or creative insights about giftedness and talent development in the context of the school, the home, and the wider society. Manuscripts that explore policy and policy implications are also welcome. Additionally, GCQ reviews selected books relevant to the field, with an emphasis on scholarly texts or text with policy implications, and publishes reviews, essay reviews, and critiques.
期刊最新文献
Differentiated Science With IVR: Effects on Gifted Students’ Engagement, Self-Regulation, and Scientific Creativity Frances A. Karnes: Four Decades of Transforming Gifted Education Through Scholarship, Advocacy, and Legislative Reform Stress Management in Honors Students: Findings From a Biofeedback Study Navigating the Complex Journey Toward Professional Excellence in Distinguished Surgeons: A Constructivist Grounded Theory Approach Representation of Linguistically Diverse Students in Gifted and Talented Services: 2006–2019 Tennessee Trends
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1